<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1Di &amp; Applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/1di-applications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/1di-applications/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:05:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ppdix</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/1di-applications/comment-page-1/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>ppdix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=963#comment-311</guid>
		<description>swede. This IS a rumor site. Valid or not, even unreal, rumors are just rumors. If u don&#039;t
Like it, u know what to do</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>swede. This IS a rumor site. Valid or not, even unreal, rumors are just rumors. If u don&#8217;t<br />
Like it, u know what to do</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CanonSwede</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/1di-applications/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>CanonSwede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=963#comment-310</guid>
		<description>This site would be much less of a frustrating waste of time stolen from us by attention seeking rumour writers, if everything classified as CR0,1 &amp; 2 was scrapped entirely and never posted. I don&#039;t really enjoy to read things that are obvious In Your Face fantasies and an insult to the reader who come here for information. It doesn&#039;t make the site owner come off as very professional either and with each low quality rumour, I feel more reluctant to return for more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site would be much less of a frustrating waste of time stolen from us by attention seeking rumour writers, if everything classified as CR0,1 &amp; 2 was scrapped entirely and never posted. I don&#8217;t really enjoy to read things that are obvious In Your Face fantasies and an insult to the reader who come here for information. It doesn&#8217;t make the site owner come off as very professional either and with each low quality rumour, I feel more reluctant to return for more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ppdix</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/1di-applications/comment-page-1/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>ppdix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=963#comment-309</guid>
		<description>As a 1D III owner and refusing anything without a 1 in it. I can&#039;t wait for a 1.3 crop 16 to 21MP at 10FPS camera. Who REALLY needs more than 10FPS? I just need a MP bump.
10MP is already obsolete...

My wishes for the 1Dx
4&quot; touch screen with touch-focus in LiveView.
21MP
1.3 Crop. I hate the distortion in FF wide angle.
63-area metering
Bring back the real 45-point focus of the 1D Mark II N
Laser Eye Focus would be nice too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a 1D III owner and refusing anything without a 1 in it. I can&#8217;t wait for a 1.3 crop 16 to 21MP at 10FPS camera. Who REALLY needs more than 10FPS? I just need a MP bump.<br />
10MP is already obsolete&#8230;</p>
<p>My wishes for the 1Dx<br />
4&#8243; touch screen with touch-focus in LiveView.<br />
21MP<br />
1.3 Crop. I hate the distortion in FF wide angle.<br />
63-area metering<br />
Bring back the real 45-point focus of the 1D Mark II N<br />
Laser Eye Focus would be nice too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valentin</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/1di-applications/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Valentin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=963#comment-308</guid>
		<description>Yes, it is true that the 1Di &quot;report&quot; smells bad in several ways, but.... a reputable source, told me, around may 10th, that ..&quot;a very fast Canon camera was in the works...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is true that the 1Di &#8220;report&#8221; smells bad in several ways, but&#8230;. a reputable source, told me, around may 10th, that ..&#8221;a very fast Canon camera was in the works&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
