<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Announcement in February? [CR3]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/announcement-in-february-cr3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/announcement-in-february-cr3/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guillermo Popkin</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/announcement-in-february-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-53960</link>
		<dc:creator>Guillermo Popkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 13:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=946#comment-53960</guid>
		<description>greetings there, i just found your website listed on bing, and i would like to say that you express exceptionally good on your blog. i am really taken by the mode that you express yourself, and the content is excellent. anyway, i would also like to know whether you would like to exchange links with my website? i will be certainly more than willing to reciprocate and insert your link off in the blogroll. anticipating for your response, thanks and enjoy your day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>greetings there, i just found your website listed on bing, and i would like to say that you express exceptionally good on your blog. i am really taken by the mode that you express yourself, and the content is excellent. anyway, i would also like to know whether you would like to exchange links with my website? i will be certainly more than willing to reciprocate and insert your link off in the blogroll. anticipating for your response, thanks and enjoy your day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/announcement-in-february-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=946#comment-253</guid>
		<description>Jay Says:
&quot;I think Canon is dropping the ball in not offering a low MP full frame camera, something around 12 or 15 MP.&quot;

Uhm, it&#039;s called the Canon 5D and it&#039;s been available for over 3 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay Says:<br />
&#8220;I think Canon is dropping the ball in not offering a low MP full frame camera, something around 12 or 15 MP.&#8221;</p>
<p>Uhm, it&#8217;s called the Canon 5D and it&#8217;s been available for over 3 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Scubadiver</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/announcement-in-february-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Scubadiver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 03:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=946#comment-252</guid>
		<description>50D for $1000 by February?  Its already a great $1200 camera, unfortunately priced at $1400.  Canon missed on this one, just not by as much as they did on the 40D last year.  It should have had a 12Mp gapless sensor, new AF system, improved AF and a working auto iso.  The latter probably could been done in software.  Its too bad because Canon has a great collection of lenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>50D for $1000 by February?  Its already a great $1200 camera, unfortunately priced at $1400.  Canon missed on this one, just not by as much as they did on the 40D last year.  It should have had a 12Mp gapless sensor, new AF system, improved AF and a working auto iso.  The latter probably could been done in software.  Its too bad because Canon has a great collection of lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arlung</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/announcement-in-february-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>arlung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 03:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=946#comment-251</guid>
		<description>so 500D is coming???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so 500D is coming???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/announcement-in-february-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 01:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=946#comment-250</guid>
		<description>I think Canon is dropping the ball in not offering a low MP full frame camera, something around 12 or 15 MP. The Nikon D700 stands pretty much by itself in this area and is a big reason I am considering the swith to Nikon. I think most non pros have no use for 20+ MP and IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m frankly tired of CanonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s approach of increasing pixels drastically with every new camera IE 40D to 50D, I can clearly see the negatives to this many pixels on a small sensor in every sample photo I have seen from the new 50DÃ¢â‚¬Â¦..IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ll pass!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Canon is dropping the ball in not offering a low MP full frame camera, something around 12 or 15 MP. The Nikon D700 stands pretty much by itself in this area and is a big reason I am considering the swith to Nikon. I think most non pros have no use for 20+ MP and IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m frankly tired of CanonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s approach of increasing pixels drastically with every new camera IE 40D to 50D, I can clearly see the negatives to this many pixels on a small sensor in every sample photo I have seen from the new 50DÃ¢â‚¬Â¦..IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ll pass!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Pastern</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/announcement-in-february-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>David Pastern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=946#comment-249</guid>
		<description>Who cares?  By then I&#039;ll be with Nikon (very unhappy Canon user).  Canon has about the worst customer service relations of any company that I&#039;ve dealt with over the past 20 years.  I don&#039;t reward companies like that with buying more of their products.

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares?  By then I&#8217;ll be with Nikon (very unhappy Canon user).  Canon has about the worst customer service relations of any company that I&#8217;ve dealt with over the past 20 years.  I don&#8217;t reward companies like that with buying more of their products.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/announcement-in-february-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 08:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=946#comment-248</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m hoping it&#039;s a 1D IV (or whatever moniker they give it).
It&#039;s time to enter the 1 series market, and I&#039;m certainly not going to try the 1D III!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m hoping it&#8217;s a 1D IV (or whatever moniker they give it).<br />
It&#8217;s time to enter the 1 series market, and I&#8217;m certainly not going to try the 1D III!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mateo</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/announcement-in-february-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>mateo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=946#comment-247</guid>
		<description>should www see the next 1Ds in the fall of 2009? That is a long wait!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>should www see the next 1Ds in the fall of 2009? That is a long wait!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1D Mark IV, bajada $ de 50D, nuevas lentes - Canonistas.com</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/announcement-in-february-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>1D Mark IV, bajada $ de 50D, nuevas lentes - Canonistas.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=946#comment-246</guid>
		<description>[...] nuevos objetivos. P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nuevos objetivos. P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesper Revald</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/announcement-in-february-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesper Revald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=946#comment-245</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m hanging in there for a 1D mrk IV (or whaterver) also.. figured that if I have waited this long, I can wait a little longer :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m hanging in there for a 1D mrk IV (or whaterver) also.. figured that if I have waited this long, I can wait a little longer :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/announcement-in-february-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=946#comment-244</guid>
		<description>Ok there obviously going to be a Feb announcement or around there w/ PMA.
Now there will likely never be a Mark IV - hear me out:
There was no G4, S4 IS, and some others.  4 is a very unlucky number in many SE asian countries and I&#039;d expect canon to just go with the Mark V.

That&#039;s my thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok there obviously going to be a Feb announcement or around there w/ PMA.<br />
Now there will likely never be a Mark IV &#8211; hear me out:<br />
There was no G4, S4 IS, and some others.  4 is a very unlucky number in many SE asian countries and I&#8217;d expect canon to just go with the Mark V.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s my thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sirimiri</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/announcement-in-february-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>sirimiri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=946#comment-243</guid>
		<description>+1 on the 400 5.6L, I&#039;m sure it&#039;s not doubt a great lens but some improved coatings, distance reporting, and potential IS and non-IS versions, that would be great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 on the 400 5.6L, I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s not doubt a great lens but some improved coatings, distance reporting, and potential IS and non-IS versions, that would be great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon Rumors</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/announcement-in-february-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=946#comment-242</guid>
		<description>Bebopcola:
I use a 1D3, and while the 5D2 looks fantastic. It&#039;s pretty easy for me to wait for the next 1D. I know I won&#039;t regret waiting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bebopcola:<br />
I use a 1D3, and while the 5D2 looks fantastic. It&#8217;s pretty easy for me to wait for the next 1D. I know I won&#8217;t regret waiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Lynch</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/announcement-in-february-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=946#comment-241</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just a little surprised that no new lens rumors have surfaced. Given the advances in the 5DMKII I would think that Canon would be looking to upgrade several of their older model &quot;L Series&quot; lenses like the 400mm f/5.6L.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just a little surprised that no new lens rumors have surfaced. Given the advances in the 5DMKII I would think that Canon would be looking to upgrade several of their older model &#8220;L Series&#8221; lenses like the 400mm f/5.6L.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/49 queries in 0.018 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 538/539 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 20:50:14 -->
