<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 1Di or something like it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: watch lovely bones</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/comment-page-1/#comment-38137</link>
		<dc:creator>watch lovely bones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/24/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/#comment-38137</guid>
		<description>hope to come back again soon and see more great posts and content</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hope to come back again soon and see more great posts and content</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Callie</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/comment-page-1/#comment-32313</link>
		<dc:creator>Callie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/24/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/#comment-32313</guid>
		<description>Very nice! Thanks for this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice! Thanks for this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canon powershoot</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/comment-page-1/#comment-32013</link>
		<dc:creator>canon powershoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/24/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/#comment-32013</guid>
		<description>Well this is very good topic, brief explanation, I did not expect to read something like this today. I&#039;ll bookmark this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this is very good topic, brief explanation, I did not expect to read something like this today. I&#8217;ll bookmark this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/comment-page-1/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/24/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/#comment-419</guid>
		<description>I hope it&#039;s not 20+fps, that&#039;s movie making and we all know it.  I question how much skill a 10+fps camera takes out of sports photography, but almost assuredly a 20fps would pull twice the skill in capturing &#039;the moment&#039; out.

On film shooting high fps was limited dramatically by how much film you had, most people being limited to 36 exposure meant that you weren&#039;t just going to make a movie.  When your camera has a 16gb card, you can shoot bursts for hours.

I am not &#039;anti-progress&#039; nor am I anti-technology.  I just hate spec myopia because often times it prevents new innovation.  Just look at processors.  The efficiency level of processors didn&#039;t change much from the Pentium II through the Pentium 4 - a span of almost a decade - but once a functional limit was hit they have created many cool new technologies like multi-core and other designs that improve the performance much more without paying any heat/power penalty.  We have seen this in point and shoots... it&#039;s all about the megapixels baby!  Let&#039;s hope that they keep the FPS somewhere around 10 - 12/14 wouldn&#039;t be too bad - and work on some other new ground breaking feature that could really make the upgrade from 10fps compelling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope it&#8217;s not 20+fps, that&#8217;s movie making and we all know it.  I question how much skill a 10+fps camera takes out of sports photography, but almost assuredly a 20fps would pull twice the skill in capturing &#8216;the moment&#8217; out.</p>
<p>On film shooting high fps was limited dramatically by how much film you had, most people being limited to 36 exposure meant that you weren&#8217;t just going to make a movie.  When your camera has a 16gb card, you can shoot bursts for hours.</p>
<p>I am not &#8216;anti-progress&#8217; nor am I anti-technology.  I just hate spec myopia because often times it prevents new innovation.  Just look at processors.  The efficiency level of processors didn&#8217;t change much from the Pentium II through the Pentium 4 &#8211; a span of almost a decade &#8211; but once a functional limit was hit they have created many cool new technologies like multi-core and other designs that improve the performance much more without paying any heat/power penalty.  We have seen this in point and shoots&#8230; it&#8217;s all about the megapixels baby!  Let&#8217;s hope that they keep the FPS somewhere around 10 &#8211; 12/14 wouldn&#8217;t be too bad &#8211; and work on some other new ground breaking feature that could really make the upgrade from 10fps compelling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/comment-page-1/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/24/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/#comment-418</guid>
		<description>http://www.thestubbornrock.com/5Dgone.tiff
check out the screen capture for proof.  The 5D, XT, and XTi are removed from Canon&#039;s website.  Then a few minutes later, there back up, and then down again.  something is happening over there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thestubbornrock.com/5Dgone.tiff" rel="nofollow">http://www.thestubbornrock.com/5Dgone.tiff</a><br />
check out the screen capture for proof.  The 5D, XT, and XTi are removed from Canon&#8217;s website.  Then a few minutes later, there back up, and then down again.  something is happening over there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/comment-page-1/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/24/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/#comment-417</guid>
		<description>When 5D is removed, the Rebels XT and XTi&#039;s are also removed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When 5D is removed, the Rebels XT and XTi&#8217;s are also removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/24/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/#comment-416</guid>
		<description>EOS 5D removed again from Canon&#039;s website. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EOS 5D removed again from Canon&#8217;s website. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/comment-page-1/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/24/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/#comment-415</guid>
		<description>EOS 5D is now back on the Canon website.  There doing something over there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EOS 5D is now back on the Canon website.  There doing something over there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/comment-page-1/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/24/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/#comment-414</guid>
		<description>EOS 5D removed from Canon&#039;s web site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EOS 5D removed from Canon&#8217;s web site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Herd</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Herd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/24/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/#comment-413</guid>
		<description>Completely agree.  The odd-ball product isn&#039;t the APS-C sized 1Di, but the APS-H sized 1D.  Discontinuing it would result in little or no pain for users, as they all have FF glass already.  They could feely choose between the APS-C 1Di or the FF 5D Mk 2, with their lens stable carrying over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely agree.  The odd-ball product isn&#8217;t the APS-C sized 1Di, but the APS-H sized 1D.  Discontinuing it would result in little or no pain for users, as they all have FF glass already.  They could feely choose between the APS-C 1Di or the FF 5D Mk 2, with their lens stable carrying over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Komarechka</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/comment-page-1/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Komarechka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/24/canon-1di-or-something-like-it/#comment-412</guid>
		<description>I actually think there is a place in the market for a product like this. I can see sports photographers looking for a camera with a little extra reach and very high FPS. an APS-C sized sensor on a 1D series product would appeal to other types as well such as wildlife or bird photographers that don&#039;t want to carry around extremely heavy glass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually think there is a place in the market for a product like this. I can see sports photographers looking for a camera with a little extra reach and very high FPS. an APS-C sized sensor on a 1D series product would appeal to other types as well such as wildlife or bird photographers that don&#8217;t want to carry around extremely heavy glass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/46 queries in 0.010 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 493/494 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 21:58:40 -->
