<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon EOS-1Di [CR2]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-eos-1di/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-eos-1di/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:58:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Raymond Hilde</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-eos-1di/comment-page-1/#comment-40164</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Hilde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=958#comment-40164</guid>
		<description>I was searching for information on lenses for my canon 500D when I found your site. Great post. Thank You.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was searching for information on lenses for my canon 500D when I found your site. Great post. Thank You.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Concerned reader</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-eos-1di/comment-page-1/#comment-11556</link>
		<dc:creator>Concerned reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=958#comment-11556</guid>
		<description>When will these fools learn to read and also write in English. 

If they gleened enough from reading it in English. What&#039;s so hard about putting their comment in a language everyone understands?
This is not cr.BE or cr.MX!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will these fools learn to read and also write in English. </p>
<p>If they gleened enough from reading it in English. What&#8217;s so hard about putting their comment in a language everyone understands?<br />
This is not cr.BE or cr.MX!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerardo</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-eos-1di/comment-page-1/#comment-2423</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=958#comment-2423</guid>
		<description>Hi,
is there any news about this camera??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
is there any news about this camera??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon EOS 1Di &#124; Fotomaf. Blog de fotografÃƒÂ­a de Mauro A. Fuentes</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-eos-1di/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon EOS 1Di &#124; Fotomaf. Blog de fotografÃƒÂ­a de Mauro A. Fuentes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 01:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=958#comment-307</guid>
		<description>[...] leÃƒÂ­a en Canon Rumours un rumor de una nueva Canon, la Canon EOS 1Di que serÃƒÂ­a la cÃƒÂ¡mara digital rÃƒÂ©flex mÃƒÂ¡s rÃƒÂ¡pida [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] leÃƒÂ­a en Canon Rumours un rumor de una nueva Canon, la Canon EOS 1Di que serÃƒÂ­a la cÃƒÂ¡mara digital rÃƒÂ©flex mÃƒÂ¡s rÃƒÂ¡pida [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auch CANON-Fans zeigen sich entt</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-eos-1di/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Auch CANON-Fans zeigen sich entt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=958#comment-306</guid>
		<description>[...] CANON-Fans zeigen sich entt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CANON-Fans zeigen sich entt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auch CANON-Fans zeigen sich entt</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-eos-1di/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Auch CANON-Fans zeigen sich entt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=958#comment-305</guid>
		<description>[...] CANON-Fans zeigen sich entt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CANON-Fans zeigen sich entt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon EOs 1Di [rumor] - Canonistas.com</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-eos-1di/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon EOs 1Di [rumor] - Canonistas.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=958#comment-304</guid>
		<description>[...] fps  mirad en la web donde han publicado el rumor las caracter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fps  mirad en la web donde han publicado el rumor las caracter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumor: Canon estarÃƒÂ­a preparando una DSLR de alta velocidad &#124; Pixelicia</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-eos-1di/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumor: Canon estarÃƒÂ­a preparando una DSLR de alta velocidad &#124; Pixelicia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=958#comment-289</guid>
		<description>[...] rumor empieza en CanonRumors (Que afortunadamente Canon dejÃƒÂ³ que siga funcionando) que publicÃƒÂ³ lo que serÃƒÂ­a el borrador de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rumor empieza en CanonRumors (Que afortunadamente Canon dejÃƒÂ³ que siga funcionando) que publicÃƒÂ³ lo que serÃƒÂ­a el borrador de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joeri van Veen</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-eos-1di/comment-page-1/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Joeri van Veen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=958#comment-292</guid>
		<description>Canon already used a pellicle mirror before, so nothing new there. However this particular configuration seems a breach of tradition (higher megapixels... professional camera&#039;s do not have an APS-C sensor) and therefore not so believable. But I would like to see the return of the pellicle mirror very much (for quiet shooting with uninterrupted view through the finder, especially when shooting wideopen which I almost always do).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon already used a pellicle mirror before, so nothing new there. However this particular configuration seems a breach of tradition (higher megapixels&#8230; professional camera&#8217;s do not have an APS-C sensor) and therefore not so believable. But I would like to see the return of the pellicle mirror very much (for quiet shooting with uninterrupted view through the finder, especially when shooting wideopen which I almost always do).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry44</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-eos-1di/comment-page-1/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>terry44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 15:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=958#comment-300</guid>
		<description>hh said: &quot;Ã¢â‚¬Â¦while the non-moving mirror may now supposedly protect the sensor from dust, doesnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t this now mean that we have to clean the mirror?&quot;

Yeah I thought that. I suppose as it&#039;s further away from the sensor the dust will be very blurred so might not be visible. But the only way to make cleaning completely unnecessary is to keep the lens in place at all times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hh said: &#8220;Ã¢â‚¬Â¦while the non-moving mirror may now supposedly protect the sensor from dust, doesnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t this now mean that we have to clean the mirror?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah I thought that. I suppose as it&#8217;s further away from the sensor the dust will be very blurred so might not be visible. But the only way to make cleaning completely unnecessary is to keep the lens in place at all times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-eos-1di/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=958#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Whoever made this needs a full time job. Get off the dole!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoever made this needs a full time job. Get off the dole!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -hh</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-eos-1di/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>-hh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=958#comment-302</guid>
		<description>It sounds like a &#039;dream&#039; list to a certain degree.

However, to play Devil&#039;s Advocate and assume that it is all 100% true...


...while the non-moving mirror may now supposedly protect the sensor from dust, doesn&#039;t this now mean that we have to clean the mirror?

:-)


-hh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like a &#8216;dream&#8217; list to a certain degree.</p>
<p>However, to play Devil&#8217;s Advocate and assume that it is all 100% true&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;while the non-moving mirror may now supposedly protect the sensor from dust, doesn&#8217;t this now mean that we have to clean the mirror?</p>
<p>:-)</p>
<p>-hh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikon</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-eos-1di/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 07:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=958#comment-301</guid>
		<description>Wow wee... I&#039;m getting me a Nikon D700!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow wee&#8230; I&#8217;m getting me a Nikon D700!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: To PRs: Is your wireless secure? &#124; the(new)mediaslut</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/canon-eos-1di/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>To PRs: Is your wireless secure? &#124; the(new)mediaslut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=958#comment-299</guid>
		<description>[...] are some excepts from Canon Rumors: - I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t like the use of APS-C. can we say it another way? - we need to make another quote, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are some excepts from Canon Rumors: &#8211; I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t like the use of APS-C. can we say it another way? &#8211; we need to make another quote, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
