<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II [CR2]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/ef-70-200-f28l-is-ii-cr2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/ef-70-200-f28l-is-ii-cr2/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:59:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/ef-70-200-f28l-is-ii-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-10595</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 06:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=955#comment-10595</guid>
		<description>yea, me 2, lets hope Canon updates the 70-200 f/2.8 IS with better optics (as good as the f/4 IS or better hopefully), 4 stop IS and perhaps slightly lighter weight?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea, me 2, lets hope Canon updates the 70-200 f/2.8 IS with better optics (as good as the f/4 IS or better hopefully), 4 stop IS and perhaps slightly lighter weight?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger767</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/ef-70-200-f28l-is-ii-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-5525</link>
		<dc:creator>roger767</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 20:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=955#comment-5525</guid>
		<description>Im holding of buying a 70-200 till canon updates it. Ill get by with a prime. A 70-200 f2.8 IS with 5 stops stabilization but with the sharpness of the f4 IS would be heaven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im holding of buying a 70-200 till canon updates it. Ill get by with a prime. A 70-200 f2.8 IS with 5 stops stabilization but with the sharpness of the f4 IS would be heaven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/ef-70-200-f28l-is-ii-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-5284</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=955#comment-5284</guid>
		<description>They should update the IS of their 28-135mm consumer zoom.

Then a 24-70mm F2.8L IS would be nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should update the IS of their 28-135mm consumer zoom.</p>
<p>Then a 24-70mm F2.8L IS would be nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/ef-70-200-f28l-is-ii-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4305</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=955#comment-4305</guid>
		<description>Heck, I would like to see an improved 70-200 f/2.8 IS, yeah there are still room for improvement for the almost perfect zoom lens. Better optics and perhaps f/2??

I definitely agree the 24-70 f/2.8 should have IS!!!! the only downside is that it has no IS!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heck, I would like to see an improved 70-200 f/2.8 IS, yeah there are still room for improvement for the almost perfect zoom lens. Better optics and perhaps f/2??</p>
<p>I definitely agree the 24-70 f/2.8 should have IS!!!! the only downside is that it has no IS!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/ef-70-200-f28l-is-ii-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4161</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=955#comment-4161</guid>
		<description>Darn it, I want the 14-24mm f2.8, careless about overpriced prime ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darn it, I want the 14-24mm f2.8, careless about overpriced prime ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gurbally seth</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/ef-70-200-f28l-is-ii-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-3298</link>
		<dc:creator>gurbally seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 04:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=955#comment-3298</guid>
		<description>Why not 14-24mm L IS USM to challenge Nikon&#039;s ultrawide? Canon&#039;s 14mm is very costly. An ultra-ultrawide zoom will be great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not 14-24mm L IS USM to challenge Nikon&#8217;s ultrawide? Canon&#8217;s 14mm is very costly. An ultra-ultrawide zoom will be great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/ef-70-200-f28l-is-ii-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=955#comment-274</guid>
		<description>Yes they should either update it with an f/2 instead of f/2.8 and or wider focal range- 55-200mm or 70-250mm preferable all with 5 stop IS. Better yet f/2.8 70-300mm 5 stop IS! canon needs to update all their old lenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes they should either update it with an f/2 instead of f/2.8 and or wider focal range- 55-200mm or 70-250mm preferable all with 5 stop IS. Better yet f/2.8 70-300mm 5 stop IS! canon needs to update all their old lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JÃƒÂ¶rg</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/ef-70-200-f28l-is-ii-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>JÃƒÂ¶rg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=955#comment-273</guid>
		<description>Since there is &quot;EF-S 17-55 F/2.8 IS&quot;, why not &quot;EF-S 50-150 F/2.8 IS&quot; ?
Sigma shows that this can be a small alternative with less weight to &quot;EF 70-200 F/2.8 L&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since there is &#8220;EF-S 17-55 F/2.8 IS&#8221;, why not &#8220;EF-S 50-150 F/2.8 IS&#8221; ?<br />
Sigma shows that this can be a small alternative with less weight to &#8220;EF 70-200 F/2.8 L&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry44</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/ef-70-200-f28l-is-ii-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>terry44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=955#comment-272</guid>
		<description>Adam, the 70-200 is too tight at the 70mm end on a crop body for many situations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, the 70-200 is too tight at the 70mm end on a crop body for many situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II [rumor] - Canonistas.com</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/10/ef-70-200-f28l-is-ii-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II [rumor] - Canonistas.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=955#comment-271</guid>
		<description>[...] IS II [rumor]     En esta web hablan sobre una posible mejora (IS y</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IS II [rumor]     En esta web hablan sobre una posible mejora (IS y</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
