<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5D Mark II&#8217;s &#8211; Calumet UK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/11/5d-mark-iis-calumet-uk-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/11/5d-mark-iis-calumet-uk-2/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/11/5d-mark-iis-calumet-uk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2346</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1414#comment-2346</guid>
		<description>I got a phone call this afternoon telling me that it was already ready to be picked up... Was just a shame I was on a train to Yorkshire at the time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a phone call this afternoon telling me that it was already ready to be picked up&#8230; Was just a shame I was on a train to Yorkshire at the time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: photoshooter</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/11/5d-mark-iis-calumet-uk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2345</link>
		<dc:creator>photoshooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 21:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1414#comment-2345</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with the comments that DPP handles Raw files better than ACR. I&#039;d already noticed that with early versions of both.having said that I really like the interface of ACR but now I try to avoid using it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with the comments that DPP handles Raw files better than ACR. I&#8217;d already noticed that with early versions of both.having said that I really like the interface of ACR but now I try to avoid using it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonsk</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/11/5d-mark-iis-calumet-uk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2363</link>
		<dc:creator>anonsk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1414#comment-2363</guid>
		<description>just got the &#039;ol &quot;Your comment is awaiting moderation&quot;, so you&#039;ll need to wait to read my comment ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just got the &#8216;ol &#8220;Your comment is awaiting moderation&#8221;, so you&#8217;ll need to wait to read my comment ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonsk</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/11/5d-mark-iis-calumet-uk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2362</link>
		<dc:creator>anonsk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1414#comment-2362</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m hoping to hear from my store today about whether I might get it this week, or if I&#039;ll need to wait till next week.

As far as conversions go, here are two examples at 6400 ISO (a little more realistic shooting speed).  The results aren&#039;t so stark, but the difference is still there.  Do you think its enough to warrent interupting my workflow for that extra quality?  I guess for an 8x10 print, no.  But for a 24x36, it may just be worth it.  What do you think?

DPP: freeimagehosting.net/uploads/31394d40bd.jpg
ACR: freeimagehosting.net/uploads/6c2d7ad3dd.jpg

I couldn&#039;t find my examples of my DXO conversions (I printed them, so I might consider scanning a close up detail to post), and my trial has run out, so I guess you&#039;ll just have to try it yourself.

This whole raw conversion stuff is a little frustrating, hey?  ACR is beautifully integrated into my workflow, but the difference is quite stark in my opinion (but the prints will be the real tellers).  I think I&#039;m done searching for raw converters - ACR for small stuff, DPP for real important stuff and thats that.

Can&#039;t wait for this camera though!  I would have to say that the noise is worse at 25,600 ISO than the D700, but its twice the megapixels, so its a trade off.  And at 6400 I&#039;d say they are tied!  Wow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m hoping to hear from my store today about whether I might get it this week, or if I&#8217;ll need to wait till next week.</p>
<p>As far as conversions go, here are two examples at 6400 ISO (a little more realistic shooting speed).  The results aren&#8217;t so stark, but the difference is still there.  Do you think its enough to warrent interupting my workflow for that extra quality?  I guess for an 8&#215;10 print, no.  But for a 24&#215;36, it may just be worth it.  What do you think?</p>
<p>DPP: freeimagehosting.net/uploads/31394d40bd.jpg<br />
ACR: freeimagehosting.net/uploads/6c2d7ad3dd.jpg</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t find my examples of my DXO conversions (I printed them, so I might consider scanning a close up detail to post), and my trial has run out, so I guess you&#8217;ll just have to try it yourself.</p>
<p>This whole raw conversion stuff is a little frustrating, hey?  ACR is beautifully integrated into my workflow, but the difference is quite stark in my opinion (but the prints will be the real tellers).  I think I&#8217;m done searching for raw converters &#8211; ACR for small stuff, DPP for real important stuff and thats that.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t wait for this camera though!  I would have to say that the noise is worse at 25,600 ISO than the D700, but its twice the megapixels, so its a trade off.  And at 6400 I&#8217;d say they are tied!  Wow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/11/5d-mark-iis-calumet-uk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2361</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1414#comment-2361</guid>
		<description>I got the call about my preorder yesterday. I got the kit. It&#039;s in the mail now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the call about my preorder yesterday. I got the kit. It&#8217;s in the mail now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/11/5d-mark-iis-calumet-uk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2360</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1414#comment-2360</guid>
		<description>Just saw your comment about DXO... I&#039;d imagine you&#039;d see the same results from dcraw - just doing the raw conversion. I don&#039;t think dcraw does anything clever other than the debayering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just saw your comment about DXO&#8230; I&#8217;d imagine you&#8217;d see the same results from dcraw &#8211; just doing the raw conversion. I don&#8217;t think dcraw does anything clever other than the debayering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/11/5d-mark-iis-calumet-uk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2359</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1414#comment-2359</guid>
		<description>dcraw is great because it&#039;s open-source and free and command-line, which is great for those of us who have huge amounts of conversions that we want to process over a number of machines. (Works on Linux, OSX and Windows, too)

I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s quality is particularly highly regarded, but it&#039;d be good to see where it stands by DPP and ACR

If you&#039;re on OSX, do grab this version (ready-compiled for OSX):
http://www.insflug.org/raw/
It was rebuilt yesterday, so I&#039;m assuming it&#039;s got the 5D MkII support built in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dcraw is great because it&#8217;s open-source and free and command-line, which is great for those of us who have huge amounts of conversions that we want to process over a number of machines. (Works on Linux, OSX and Windows, too)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s quality is particularly highly regarded, but it&#8217;d be good to see where it stands by DPP and ACR</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re on OSX, do grab this version (ready-compiled for OSX):<br />
<a href="http://www.insflug.org/raw/" rel="nofollow">http://www.insflug.org/raw/</a><br />
It was rebuilt yesterday, so I&#8217;m assuming it&#8217;s got the 5D MkII support built in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonsk</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/11/5d-mark-iis-calumet-uk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2358</link>
		<dc:creator>anonsk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1414#comment-2358</guid>
		<description>never heard of it.  I&#039;ll have to give it a try.  Does it have a particular reputation for a specific quality in its raw conversions.  I also tried DXO Optics 5.3 raw converter (the 5D Mark II is not supported but have tried it with my 5D and 50D) and too have been dissapointed in certain regards.  At high ISOs it simply smothers details with *no* noise reduction - it is just the raw conversion engine.  It creates a very fine grain, but as it is pasted on an overly smooth image, it just doesn&#039;t look right.  I&#039;ll have to dig up some comparisons for you to post later today maybe.  I&#039;ll also look into dcraw (free trial??)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>never heard of it.  I&#8217;ll have to give it a try.  Does it have a particular reputation for a specific quality in its raw conversions.  I also tried DXO Optics 5.3 raw converter (the 5D Mark II is not supported but have tried it with my 5D and 50D) and too have been dissapointed in certain regards.  At high ISOs it simply smothers details with *no* noise reduction &#8211; it is just the raw conversion engine.  It creates a very fine grain, but as it is pasted on an overly smooth image, it just doesn&#8217;t look right.  I&#8217;ll have to dig up some comparisons for you to post later today maybe.  I&#8217;ll also look into dcraw (free trial??)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/11/5d-mark-iis-calumet-uk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2357</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1414#comment-2357</guid>
		<description>anonsk: Thanks for those... That&#039;s a amazing difference....

Out of interest, have you tried (or would you get a chance to try) using dcraw to convert them? We use that a lot here for automated conversions.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anonsk: Thanks for those&#8230; That&#8217;s a amazing difference&#8230;.</p>
<p>Out of interest, have you tried (or would you get a chance to try) using dcraw to convert them? We use that a lot here for automated conversions&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/11/5d-mark-iis-calumet-uk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2356</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1414#comment-2356</guid>
		<description>DPP is the best IMO for Raw conversion. It&#039;s amazing how much leniency it gives you before any kind of noise is introduced. The noise reduction function is a bit pants on colours though (seems to shift them), but curves and exposure adjustment are brilliant in DPP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DPP is the best IMO for Raw conversion. It&#8217;s amazing how much leniency it gives you before any kind of noise is introduced. The noise reduction function is a bit pants on colours though (seems to shift them), but curves and exposure adjustment are brilliant in DPP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rubas</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/11/5d-mark-iis-calumet-uk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2355</link>
		<dc:creator>rubas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1414#comment-2355</guid>
		<description>amazon took away the 25th of december message but still no date for shipment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amazon took away the 25th of december message but still no date for shipment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonsk</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/11/5d-mark-iis-calumet-uk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2354</link>
		<dc:creator>anonsk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1414#comment-2354</guid>
		<description>Here are the links please don&#039;t moderate me this time ;-)

DPP
freeimagehosting.net/uploads/6fceef0f9b.jpg

ACR
freeimagehosting.net/uploads/36ca637dc7.jpg

your conclusions? (these are 100% crops at 25,600 ISO on the new 5D Mark II)

I wouldn&#039;t say these are conclusive and final, but I would say it is a fairly controlled.  have you found similar results? ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are the links please don&#8217;t moderate me this time ;-)</p>
<p>DPP<br />
freeimagehosting.net/uploads/6fceef0f9b.jpg</p>
<p>ACR<br />
freeimagehosting.net/uploads/36ca637dc7.jpg</p>
<p>your conclusions? (these are 100% crops at 25,600 ISO on the new 5D Mark II)</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say these are conclusive and final, but I would say it is a fairly controlled.  have you found similar results? &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/11/5d-mark-iis-calumet-uk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2353</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 15:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1414#comment-2353</guid>
		<description>Oh, I guess Lightroom is probably the same as ACR under the hood....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I guess Lightroom is probably the same as ACR under the hood&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/11/5d-mark-iis-calumet-uk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2352</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 15:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1414#comment-2352</guid>
		<description>Any idea on what Aperture or Lightroom are like with the same files? (I&#039;ll be doing my own tests come next week - just wondering!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any idea on what Aperture or Lightroom are like with the same files? (I&#8217;ll be doing my own tests come next week &#8211; just wondering!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
