<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5D Mark II &#8211; User Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/5d-mark-ii-user-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/5d-mark-ii-user-review/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:15:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Liliana</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/5d-mark-ii-user-review/comment-page-1/#comment-30462</link>
		<dc:creator>Liliana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=794#comment-30462</guid>
		<description>this is really a wonderful camera, very easy to use and fun to use. I highly recommend it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is really a wonderful camera, very easy to use and fun to use. I highly recommend it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zerogravity</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/5d-mark-ii-user-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2766</link>
		<dc:creator>Zerogravity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=794#comment-2766</guid>
		<description>Hello,
yes really good review! But I have 2 things to ad... EV on mark II. suppose to be much wider on paper at least Ã¢â‚¬Â¢ AF working range: -0.5 - 18 EV (at 23Ã‚Â°C, ISO 100)source www.dpreview.com , so measuring real EV in practical use is very important thing to be determined. I hope it is more than 10EV which is same like Fuji Velvia and that is not very wide range. Pixels and Dynamic range were 2 things evolving since the beginning of the DSLRs which made biggest difference and progress. My mark II. produced great landscape photos but I still didn&#039;t meter EV range. Second thing I have noticed and it is not in the review is that ISO 50 is absolutely stunning, much better than 100 which wasn&#039;t the case on mark 1. Interesting how many people would shoot auto ISO and set up time and aperture and use ISO to compensate exposure - it is almost like point and shoot :) but for photojournalist and some sport photographers it is good feature on camera body, I don&#039;t miss it on mark II personally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
yes really good review! But I have 2 things to ad&#8230; EV on mark II. suppose to be much wider on paper at least Ã¢â‚¬Â¢ AF working range: -0.5 &#8211; 18 EV (at 23Ã‚Â°C, ISO 100)source <a href="http://www.dpreview.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com</a> , so measuring real EV in practical use is very important thing to be determined. I hope it is more than 10EV which is same like Fuji Velvia and that is not very wide range. Pixels and Dynamic range were 2 things evolving since the beginning of the DSLRs which made biggest difference and progress. My mark II. produced great landscape photos but I still didn&#8217;t meter EV range. Second thing I have noticed and it is not in the review is that ISO 50 is absolutely stunning, much better than 100 which wasn&#8217;t the case on mark 1. Interesting how many people would shoot auto ISO and set up time and aperture and use ISO to compensate exposure &#8211; it is almost like point and shoot :) but for photojournalist and some sport photographers it is good feature on camera body, I don&#8217;t miss it on mark II personally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claude Angers</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/5d-mark-ii-user-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2754</link>
		<dc:creator>Claude Angers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 02:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=794#comment-2754</guid>
		<description>@ Chris L. Thanks. Where I&#039;m coming from (D60!!!) anything will be a HUGE improvement. Merry Christmas
BTW my camera has not arrived due to some delays in shipments from Toronto :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Chris L. Thanks. Where I&#8217;m coming from (D60!!!) anything will be a HUGE improvement. Merry Christmas<br />
BTW my camera has not arrived due to some delays in shipments from Toronto :-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gusto</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/5d-mark-ii-user-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2753</link>
		<dc:creator>Gusto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 02:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=794#comment-2753</guid>
		<description>Indeed, a very honest and unbiased review with rather accurate information. I am rather surprised and disappointed that Canon has not been able to make better progress in the sensor dynamic range department.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, a very honest and unbiased review with rather accurate information. I am rather surprised and disappointed that Canon has not been able to make better progress in the sensor dynamic range department.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris L.</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/5d-mark-ii-user-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2752</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 01:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=794#comment-2752</guid>
		<description>Excellence review!  

Claude, despite all the disappointing things about the 5Dmk2, you will be very surprise of the other wonderful improvement on the camera.  I was able to take some wonderful pictures under normal condition.  However, I had to basically experiment the best settings (aperture, shutter, ISO, W/B, etc) on the 5Dmk2 for a clear sharp image based on the glass used.  The 40D I knew exactly what setting to use from the get go.  But, taking on this beast took a little more time because of the wide range of features I had to learn.

Overall, I love the 5Dmk2 and looking forward to more wonderful pictures.

By the way, love your portrait pictures.  Great job.

Merry Christmas to all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellence review!  </p>
<p>Claude, despite all the disappointing things about the 5Dmk2, you will be very surprise of the other wonderful improvement on the camera.  I was able to take some wonderful pictures under normal condition.  However, I had to basically experiment the best settings (aperture, shutter, ISO, W/B, etc) on the 5Dmk2 for a clear sharp image based on the glass used.  The 40D I knew exactly what setting to use from the get go.  But, taking on this beast took a little more time because of the wide range of features I had to learn.</p>
<p>Overall, I love the 5Dmk2 and looking forward to more wonderful pictures.</p>
<p>By the way, love your portrait pictures.  Great job.</p>
<p>Merry Christmas to all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fritz</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/5d-mark-ii-user-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2751</link>
		<dc:creator>fritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 01:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=794#comment-2751</guid>
		<description>That is the most unbiased and honest review I&#039;ve ever read about the 5D mkII. =))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is the most unbiased and honest review I&#8217;ve ever read about the 5D mkII. =))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claude</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/5d-mark-ii-user-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2743</link>
		<dc:creator>Claude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=794#comment-2743</guid>
		<description>You are correct, this review is the most interesting I&#039;ve read so far. I like the way the reviewer compares the MkII with other bodies based on field use. I am told I should get mine today so, in the meantime, I have been keeping myself entertained by all the reviews out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct, this review is the most interesting I&#8217;ve read so far. I like the way the reviewer compares the MkII with other bodies based on field use. I am told I should get mine today so, in the meantime, I have been keeping myself entertained by all the reviews out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
