<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PowerShot SD 1200 and more [CR3]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/powershot-sd-1200-and-more-cr3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/powershot-sd-1200-and-more-cr3/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:36:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: canixy</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/powershot-sd-1200-and-more-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-13914</link>
		<dc:creator>canixy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 07:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=824#comment-13914</guid>
		<description>DIGIC IV and 3.0 inch LCD is nice feauture, My blue color and sd1200 body is pretty and small. new camera compact modify from sd1100is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DIGIC IV and 3.0 inch LCD is nice feauture, My blue color and sd1200 body is pretty and small. new camera compact modify from sd1100is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sd1200</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/powershot-sd-1200-and-more-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-8051</link>
		<dc:creator>sd1200</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=824#comment-8051</guid>
		<description>canon sd1200 six color is good
i like blue color</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>canon sd1200 six color is good<br />
i like blue color</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yvesson</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/powershot-sd-1200-and-more-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-3448</link>
		<dc:creator>yvesson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=824#comment-3448</guid>
		<description>Hej, Really boring... No IS, no manual modes, no viewfinder, to sum up : nothing new, even it&#039;s more expensive than A470 when it came out. F3.0/F5.8, have they done as bad in the past ? 
Seems canon doesn&#039;t wanna sell cameras anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hej, Really boring&#8230; No IS, no manual modes, no viewfinder, to sum up : nothing new, even it&#8217;s more expensive than A470 when it came out. F3.0/F5.8, have they done as bad in the past ?<br />
Seems canon doesn&#8217;t wanna sell cameras anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AA</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/powershot-sd-1200-and-more-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-3441</link>
		<dc:creator>AA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=824#comment-3441</guid>
		<description>The PowerShot  A470 has in fact  been replaced by a new model-PowerShot A480:
http://www.canon.co.uk/For_Home/Product_Finder/Cameras/Digital_Camera/PowerShot/PowerShot_A480/index.asp

3.3X Zoom (slight reduction from the 3.4x on the 470)
10MP
25% smaller body</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PowerShot  A470 has in fact  been replaced by a new model-PowerShot A480:<br />
<a href="http://www.canon.co.uk/For_Home/Product_Finder/Cameras/Digital_Camera/PowerShot/PowerShot_A480/index.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.canon.co.uk/For_Home/Product_Finder/Cameras/Digital_Camera/PowerShot/PowerShot_A480/index.asp</a></p>
<p>3.3X Zoom (slight reduction from the 3.4x on the 470)<br />
10MP<br />
25% smaller body</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/powershot-sd-1200-and-more-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-2996</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 04:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=824#comment-2996</guid>
		<description>The ONLY thing that would interest me in buying any pocketable powershot would be HDvideo. Heck the TX1 had it in 2007!  Whichever between Nikon and Canon comes out with one would have my $$. We passed on upgrading our SD800is for that very reason this Xmas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ONLY thing that would interest me in buying any pocketable powershot would be HDvideo. Heck the TX1 had it in 2007!  Whichever between Nikon and Canon comes out with one would have my $$. We passed on upgrading our SD800is for that very reason this Xmas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/powershot-sd-1200-and-more-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-2987</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 20:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=824#comment-2987</guid>
		<description>Do we think these models will be released in January?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do we think these models will be released in January?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/powershot-sd-1200-and-more-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-2901</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 04:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=824#comment-2901</guid>
		<description>Seeing as the PSA470 is being discountined, that leaves no sub $150 PowerShot in the range-making the $199 E1 the entry level model.

Sony makes some very slim touchscreen cameras models (eg. DSC-T77/T700) -would the SD3000IS be quite slim?

I&#039;m guessing it won&#039;t use folding optical lens design, though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing as the PSA470 is being discountined, that leaves no sub $150 PowerShot in the range-making the $199 E1 the entry level model.</p>
<p>Sony makes some very slim touchscreen cameras models (eg. DSC-T77/T700) -would the SD3000IS be quite slim?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing it won&#8217;t use folding optical lens design, though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/powershot-sd-1200-and-more-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-2897</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 01:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=824#comment-2897</guid>
		<description>I am going to need to see pictures taken in the same place with the same lighting to see if the CMOS sensor in the SX1 is any better than the CCD in the SX10. Hopefully as I said above Camera Labs or some other camera review site will put the SX1 and SX10 head to head. As of now I can&#039;t see how a CCD could beat the CMOS sensor in the SX1. Only time will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to need to see pictures taken in the same place with the same lighting to see if the CMOS sensor in the SX1 is any better than the CCD in the SX10. Hopefully as I said above Camera Labs or some other camera review site will put the SX1 and SX10 head to head. As of now I can&#8217;t see how a CCD could beat the CMOS sensor in the SX1. Only time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yvesson</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/powershot-sd-1200-and-more-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-2894</link>
		<dc:creator>yvesson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 23:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=824#comment-2894</guid>
		<description>Hej, the screen of SX1 is 16/9, not only that it sucks as a ratio, but you just have that extra width difference, useless for pics, that is. Unfortunately no 4/3 video mode more than 640x480, though it&#039;s possible, nor 60fps mode as old powershots used to have, instead sucky 16/9 full HD. Continous shooting = good, but all pics I have seen SX1 CMOS &lt; SX10 CCD for picture quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hej, the screen of SX1 is 16/9, not only that it sucks as a ratio, but you just have that extra width difference, useless for pics, that is. Unfortunately no 4/3 video mode more than 640&#215;480, though it&#8217;s possible, nor 60fps mode as old powershots used to have, instead sucky 16/9 full HD. Continous shooting = good, but all pics I have seen SX1 CMOS &lt; SX10 CCD for picture quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/powershot-sd-1200-and-more-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-2890</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 20:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=824#comment-2890</guid>
		<description>2.8 vs 2.5 inch screen
4fps vs 1.4fps continous shooting
Remote vs NO remote
Full 1080p at 30fps vs 640x480 at 30fps
CMOS vs CCD (waiting for Gordon Laing at Camera Labs for his SX1 IS review to see if the quality is any better)

I think it will be worth wating for. I have done the math and if Canon prices the SX1 IS the same as they did in the UK it shold be no more than $500 USD NOT $700</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2.8 vs 2.5 inch screen<br />
4fps vs 1.4fps continous shooting<br />
Remote vs NO remote<br />
Full 1080p at 30fps vs 640&#215;480 at 30fps<br />
CMOS vs CCD (waiting for Gordon Laing at Camera Labs for his SX1 IS review to see if the quality is any better)</p>
<p>I think it will be worth wating for. I have done the math and if Canon prices the SX1 IS the same as they did in the UK it shold be no more than $500 USD NOT $700</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yvesson</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/powershot-sd-1200-and-more-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-2885</link>
		<dc:creator>yvesson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=824#comment-2885</guid>
		<description>Hej, imo the SX110 is that A serie last model. But next disappointment is a canon &quot;TZ5&quot; in september. :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hej, imo the SX110 is that A serie last model. But next disappointment is a canon &#8220;TZ5&#8243; in september. :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/powershot-sd-1200-and-more-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-2884</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=824#comment-2884</guid>
		<description>I shared hundreds ( or thousands??)of Powershot A series enthusiastists dissapointment over canon decision on srapping the manual exposure controls in their so called latest A series line up.

It is such a wonderful camera with full manual control over it, and now if you want a small camera with that function, Canon G10 is the only choice you have (not forgetting the hefty price tag!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shared hundreds ( or thousands??)of Powershot A series enthusiastists dissapointment over canon decision on srapping the manual exposure controls in their so called latest A series line up.</p>
<p>It is such a wonderful camera with full manual control over it, and now if you want a small camera with that function, Canon G10 is the only choice you have (not forgetting the hefty price tag!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -hh</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/powershot-sd-1200-and-more-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-2883</link>
		<dc:creator>-hh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=824#comment-2883</guid>
		<description>yvesson, I agree with you about Canon going the wrong way.

I&#039;ve just finished a good serious look at the Canon (and other) compact line for a Christmas gift. I ended up with deciding upon the A590 as the &quot;lost the least number of features&quot; replacement for an A80.

And now the A590 is being discontinued and not replaced.  

Apparently, it is lost upon Canon that a P&amp;S with an optical viewfinder and manual controls is what facilitates a P&amp;S photographer to do more than &#039;snapshots&#039; and thus develop his skills so that he is then more interested in moving upmarket to buy a dSLR...which means more revenue potential for Canon.


-hh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yvesson, I agree with you about Canon going the wrong way.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve just finished a good serious look at the Canon (and other) compact line for a Christmas gift. I ended up with deciding upon the A590 as the &#8220;lost the least number of features&#8221; replacement for an A80.</p>
<p>And now the A590 is being discontinued and not replaced.  </p>
<p>Apparently, it is lost upon Canon that a P&amp;S with an optical viewfinder and manual controls is what facilitates a P&amp;S photographer to do more than &#8217;snapshots&#8217; and thus develop his skills so that he is then more interested in moving upmarket to buy a dSLR&#8230;which means more revenue potential for Canon.</p>
<p>-hh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yvesson</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/powershot-sd-1200-and-more-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-2882</link>
		<dc:creator>yvesson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=824#comment-2882</guid>
		<description>Hej, pff canon totally going the wrong way, the first one is just another IXUS 85-90, the second one with stupid touchscreen (argh) and maybe the underwater camera can be nice, but an IXUS with no manual controls. 
And of course no replacements for the nice A590 (expected, but wwe can&#039;t be sure) and no very cheap A480 IS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hej, pff canon totally going the wrong way, the first one is just another IXUS 85-90, the second one with stupid touchscreen (argh) and maybe the underwater camera can be nice, but an IXUS with no manual controls.<br />
And of course no replacements for the nice A590 (expected, but wwe can&#8217;t be sure) and no very cheap A480 IS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
