<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zeiss ZE 50 f/1.4 &amp; ZE 85 f/1.4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/zeiss-ze-50-f14-ze-85-f14/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/zeiss-ze-50-f14-ze-85-f14/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:50:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: olivier</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/zeiss-ze-50-f14-ze-85-f14/comment-page-1/#comment-3141</link>
		<dc:creator>olivier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1489#comment-3141</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

I got the Zeiss ZE 50mm few weeks ago, and i have to say I pretty happy with it, very precise Focus ring,focus confirmation is perfect, work well in high contrast, 
Have been using it on a 5D, and works very fine. impressive color fidelity...

I tryed it on 5D mkII and didn&#039;t work, seems we need a Firmware update.

here is a link to some of my galeries using the Zeis and the 85 f1.2 L as well.
http://olivierpinol.smugmug.com/gallery/6819520_cwqqm#436053545_bXMLU
http://olivierpinol.smugmug.com/gallery/6823004_sozSr#436038737_3LPNB
http://olivierpinol.smugmug.com/gallery/6897676_kkYiY#441279958_uXyXD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>I got the Zeiss ZE 50mm few weeks ago, and i have to say I pretty happy with it, very precise Focus ring,focus confirmation is perfect, work well in high contrast,<br />
Have been using it on a 5D, and works very fine. impressive color fidelity&#8230;</p>
<p>I tryed it on 5D mkII and didn&#8217;t work, seems we need a Firmware update.</p>
<p>here is a link to some of my galeries using the Zeis and the 85 f1.2 L as well.<br />
<a href="http://olivierpinol.smugmug.com/gallery/6819520_cwqqm#436053545_bXMLU" rel="nofollow">http://olivierpinol.smugmug.com/gallery/6819520_cwqqm#436053545_bXMLU</a><br />
<a href="http://olivierpinol.smugmug.com/gallery/6823004_sozSr#436038737_3LPNB" rel="nofollow">http://olivierpinol.smugmug.com/gallery/6823004_sozSr#436038737_3LPNB</a><br />
<a href="http://olivierpinol.smugmug.com/gallery/6897676_kkYiY#441279958_uXyXD" rel="nofollow">http://olivierpinol.smugmug.com/gallery/6897676_kkYiY#441279958_uXyXD</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas Andersson</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/zeiss-ze-50-f14-ze-85-f14/comment-page-1/#comment-2739</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas Andersson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1489#comment-2739</guid>
		<description>Hi,

How is the test going? Any results yet? IÃ‚Â´m very eager to see the results since IÃ‚Â´m planning on switching my 85/1.8 to 1.2 or a Zeiss 1.4. The Zeiss is very appeling because of itÃ‚Â´s smaller size compared to the EF 85/1.2L.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>How is the test going? Any results yet? IÃ‚Â´m very eager to see the results since IÃ‚Â´m planning on switching my 85/1.8 to 1.2 or a Zeiss 1.4. The Zeiss is very appeling because of itÃ‚Â´s smaller size compared to the EF 85/1.2L.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Chase</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/zeiss-ze-50-f14-ze-85-f14/comment-page-1/#comment-1923</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1489#comment-1923</guid>
		<description>Dang someone beat me to the Mythbusters episode...  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang someone beat me to the Mythbusters episode&#8230;  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ms</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/zeiss-ze-50-f14-ze-85-f14/comment-page-1/#comment-1922</link>
		<dc:creator>ms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1489#comment-1922</guid>
		<description>dear god... they are getting really desperate for myths aren&#039;t they</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dear god&#8230; they are getting really desperate for myths aren&#8217;t they</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorkage</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/zeiss-ze-50-f14-ze-85-f14/comment-page-1/#comment-1921</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorkage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1489#comment-1921</guid>
		<description>Ã¢â‚¬Å“No it isnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t. You canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t polish a turd. ;-)Ã¢â‚¬Â

I thought so too, but apparently we&#039;re both wrong:

http://mythbustersresults.com/episode-113-end-with-a-bang

(#2)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ã¢â‚¬Å“No it isnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t. You canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t polish a turd. ;-)Ã¢â‚¬Â</p>
<p>I thought so too, but apparently we&#8217;re both wrong:</p>
<p><a href="http://mythbustersresults.com/episode-113-end-with-a-bang" rel="nofollow">http://mythbustersresults.com/episode-113-end-with-a-bang</a></p>
<p>(#2)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ms</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/zeiss-ze-50-f14-ze-85-f14/comment-page-1/#comment-1920</link>
		<dc:creator>ms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1489#comment-1920</guid>
		<description>&quot;No it isnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t. You canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t polish a turd. ;-)&quot;


LOL... I couldn&#039;t have said it better myself =D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;No it isnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t. You canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t polish a turd. ;-)&#8221;</p>
<p>LOL&#8230; I couldn&#8217;t have said it better myself =D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/zeiss-ze-50-f14-ze-85-f14/comment-page-1/#comment-1919</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1489#comment-1919</guid>
		<description>&quot;even if the optical quality is better who would risk a out of focus image?&quot;

Sounds very defeatist to me, how on earth did we all manage before AF was invented I wonder?!

&quot;its easier to use af and sharpen a bit if the image is soft&quot;

No it isn&#039;t. You can&#039;t polish a turd. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;even if the optical quality is better who would risk a out of focus image?&#8221;</p>
<p>Sounds very defeatist to me, how on earth did we all manage before AF was invented I wonder?!</p>
<p>&#8220;its easier to use af and sharpen a bit if the image is soft&#8221;</p>
<p>No it isn&#8217;t. You can&#8217;t polish a turd. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ms</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/zeiss-ze-50-f14-ze-85-f14/comment-page-1/#comment-1914</link>
		<dc:creator>ms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1489#comment-1914</guid>
		<description>Im sure the 18mm will be made for EOS... just a matter of time just like their excellent 50mm and 100mm makro-planars (both are very special in their own right)... if you don&#039;t think that a zeiss wide angle would ad anything to the EOS options then you&#039;ve probably never shot a good zeiss lens before ... as for going ultrawide, it seems that zeiss is slowly replicating their contax line in the ZF and ultimately the ZE lineups... if one is to look back at the contax lenses you&#039;ll see that there was a 15mm distagon which by all accounts was quite nice... with the 18mm and 21mm announced Im guessing that the 15mm will be one of the next, if not THE next new focal length added to the lineup... as for focusing, the MF zeiss lenses are very easy to precisely focus and with the addition of focus confirmation on the ZE line using the cameras AF sensor the only difference is that you are doing the moving and not the motor (adapted ZF lenses can also be chipped to do the same, as Ive done with my 100/2). If you like AF only that&#039;s your prerogative but to dismiss them as not needed by anyone? You obviously haven&#039;t seen the images that some of these lenses produce and you need to look at the prices that people bid these lenses up to... there is real demand</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im sure the 18mm will be made for EOS&#8230; just a matter of time just like their excellent 50mm and 100mm makro-planars (both are very special in their own right)&#8230; if you don&#8217;t think that a zeiss wide angle would ad anything to the EOS options then you&#8217;ve probably never shot a good zeiss lens before &#8230; as for going ultrawide, it seems that zeiss is slowly replicating their contax line in the ZF and ultimately the ZE lineups&#8230; if one is to look back at the contax lenses you&#8217;ll see that there was a 15mm distagon which by all accounts was quite nice&#8230; with the 18mm and 21mm announced Im guessing that the 15mm will be one of the next, if not THE next new focal length added to the lineup&#8230; as for focusing, the MF zeiss lenses are very easy to precisely focus and with the addition of focus confirmation on the ZE line using the cameras AF sensor the only difference is that you are doing the moving and not the motor (adapted ZF lenses can also be chipped to do the same, as Ive done with my 100/2). If you like AF only that&#8217;s your prerogative but to dismiss them as not needed by anyone? You obviously haven&#8217;t seen the images that some of these lenses produce and you need to look at the prices that people bid these lenses up to&#8230; there is real demand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gnarf</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/zeiss-ze-50-f14-ze-85-f14/comment-page-1/#comment-1913</link>
		<dc:creator>gnarf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1489#comment-1913</guid>
		<description>noone needs this lens segment on canon
i mean there are already good lenses made by canon and sigma
even if the optical quality is better who would risk a out of focus image? its easier to use af and sharpen a bit if the image is soft

what the canon world needs are wide angles! the 10-22 is crap and works only at cropsensors
the 12-24 sigma is supersoft

when do we finaly get the zeiss 18mm for canon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>noone needs this lens segment on canon<br />
i mean there are already good lenses made by canon and sigma<br />
even if the optical quality is better who would risk a out of focus image? its easier to use af and sharpen a bit if the image is soft</p>
<p>what the canon world needs are wide angles! the 10-22 is crap and works only at cropsensors<br />
the 12-24 sigma is supersoft</p>
<p>when do we finaly get the zeiss 18mm for canon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bebopcola</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2008/12/zeiss-ze-50-f14-ze-85-f14/comment-page-1/#comment-1918</link>
		<dc:creator>Bebopcola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 17:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1489#comment-1918</guid>
		<description>Awesome. Get to it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome. Get to it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
