<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EF 300 f/2.8L IS II [CR2]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/ef-300-f28l-is-ii-cr2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/ef-300-f28l-is-ii-cr2/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon Rumors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New IS Lenses? [CR1]</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/ef-300-f28l-is-ii-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-13667</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New IS Lenses? [CR1]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=902#comment-13667</guid>
		<description>[...] have a history dating back a fair ways stating we&#8217;d see an update to the big white lenses for the Olympics and World [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have a history dating back a fair ways stating we&#8217;d see an update to the big white lenses for the Olympics and World [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enjott</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/ef-300-f28l-is-ii-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-3561</link>
		<dc:creator>Enjott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=902#comment-3561</guid>
		<description>I think they should release a 200/2.8 IS. The zoom is too heavy and has reduced light transmission compared to a fixed focal length lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they should release a 200/2.8 IS. The zoom is too heavy and has reduced light transmission compared to a fixed focal length lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/ef-300-f28l-is-ii-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-3358</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=902#comment-3358</guid>
		<description>The white lenses are already great... update some of the b!@#$n black ones instead!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The white lenses are already great&#8230; update some of the b!@#$n black ones instead!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ms</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/ef-300-f28l-is-ii-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-3352</link>
		<dc:creator>ms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=902#comment-3352</guid>
		<description>cranking up prices on already expensive lens would be a huge mistake... in these economic times they need some more affordable alternatives that will get sales moving... the 500/5.6 IS, or 400/4 L (no-DO please) or even an update to the 100-400IS (maybe make it a 200-500/5.6 IS?).... anyway...more lenses in the 1-2.5k range... dont mess with the lenses that are already great (and extremely expensive) just so you can try to squeeze a few bucks more</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cranking up prices on already expensive lens would be a huge mistake&#8230; in these economic times they need some more affordable alternatives that will get sales moving&#8230; the 500/5.6 IS, or 400/4 L (no-DO please) or even an update to the 100-400IS (maybe make it a 200-500/5.6 IS?)&#8230;. anyway&#8230;more lenses in the 1-2.5k range&#8230; dont mess with the lenses that are already great (and extremely expensive) just so you can try to squeeze a few bucks more</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/ef-300-f28l-is-ii-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-3343</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=902#comment-3343</guid>
		<description>Wonder what the price will be like. I can imagine a huge hike that won&#039;t make it worth it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder what the price will be like. I can imagine a huge hike that won&#8217;t make it worth it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/ef-300-f28l-is-ii-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-3339</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=902#comment-3339</guid>
		<description>300 2.8IS should be one of the last lens updates in Canon&#039;s playbook. 400 f4IS, 500 f5.6IS, 200-400 f4IS (or 100-400 f4-5.6) should all come before it on the super tele list and zoom list.

I don&#039;t think this rumor will bear fruit anytime soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>300 2.8IS should be one of the last lens updates in Canon&#8217;s playbook. 400 f4IS, 500 f5.6IS, 200-400 f4IS (or 100-400 f4-5.6) should all come before it on the super tele list and zoom list.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think this rumor will bear fruit anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ms</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/ef-300-f28l-is-ii-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-3335</link>
		<dc:creator>ms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=902#comment-3335</guid>
		<description>umm...whaaaa?  they have a ton of other lenses that could use and overhaul to keep up with the balloning MP numbers (both the 5d MKII and the 50D)...and they go for one of their sharpest lenses first? WTF?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>umm&#8230;whaaaa?  they have a ton of other lenses that could use and overhaul to keep up with the balloning MP numbers (both the 5d MKII and the 50D)&#8230;and they go for one of their sharpest lenses first? WTF?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/ef-300-f28l-is-ii-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-3326</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=902#comment-3326</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see a need to upgrade this awesome lens. The 200 f/2 MIGHT just pip it in IQ, but if it does, only just.

Easily, the Canon 300 2.8 IS is one of the best lenses produced by Canon and Nikon both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see a need to upgrade this awesome lens. The 200 f/2 MIGHT just pip it in IQ, but if it does, only just.</p>
<p>Easily, the Canon 300 2.8 IS is one of the best lenses produced by Canon and Nikon both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jWeu</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/ef-300-f28l-is-ii-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-3325</link>
		<dc:creator>jWeu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=902#comment-3325</guid>
		<description>If you look at the MTF at www.usa.canon.com, the image quality is extremely good compared to other L-lenses. May be, the IS is improved.

There are a lot of other lenses they should improve to be usable with open aperture and 20MP (80lines per mm at the chip?) like 50/1.4 .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you look at the MTF at <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.usa.canon.com</a>, the image quality is extremely good compared to other L-lenses. May be, the IS is improved.</p>
<p>There are a lot of other lenses they should improve to be usable with open aperture and 20MP (80lines per mm at the chip?) like 50/1.4 .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/44 queries in 0.011 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 463/464 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 17:16:33 -->
