<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EOS &amp; Lenses at PMA [CR3]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/eos-lenses-at-pma-cr3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/eos-lenses-at-pma-cr3/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:58:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: matic</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/eos-lenses-at-pma-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-3898</link>
		<dc:creator>matic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=947#comment-3898</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m expecting an 24-80 f2.0 IS(4f stop) and a new 80-250f2.8 IS(4f stop):D

...just a dream...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m expecting an 24-80 f2.0 IS(4f stop) and a new 80-250f2.8 IS(4f stop):D</p>
<p>&#8230;just a dream&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tivier</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/eos-lenses-at-pma-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-3784</link>
		<dc:creator>Tivier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=947#comment-3784</guid>
		<description>jWeu =&gt; ef 50mm f/1.8 (130g)!

review at :
http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/160-canon-ef-50mm-f18-ii-test-report--review</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jWeu =&gt; ef 50mm f/1.8 (130g)!</p>
<p>review at :<br />
<a href="http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/160-canon-ef-50mm-f18-ii-test-report--review" rel="nofollow">http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/160-canon-ef-50mm-f18-ii-test-report&#8211;review</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jWeu</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/eos-lenses-at-pma-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-3751</link>
		<dc:creator>jWeu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=947#comment-3751</guid>
		<description>I have a Zeiss lens 45mm f/2.8 for my old Contax what is very tiny (90g). Why canon has not such a small lens at EF-Series or EF-S ? With such a lens you can carry the camera all the time with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Zeiss lens 45mm f/2.8 for my old Contax what is very tiny (90g). Why canon has not such a small lens at EF-Series or EF-S ? With such a lens you can carry the camera all the time with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tivier</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/eos-lenses-at-pma-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-3743</link>
		<dc:creator>Tivier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 14:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=947#comment-3743</guid>
		<description>50mm f/1.4 mk II!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>50mm f/1.4 mk II!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/eos-lenses-at-pma-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-3737</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 05:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=947#comment-3737</guid>
		<description>Yes, a 400IS F5.6L or 500IS F5.6L would be great!  Weather sealed as well.  At minimum, Canon needs a 300IS F4 Mk II with 4-5 stop IS and weather sealing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, a 400IS F5.6L or 500IS F5.6L would be great!  Weather sealed as well.  At minimum, Canon needs a 300IS F4 Mk II with 4-5 stop IS and weather sealing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nounours18200</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/eos-lenses-at-pma-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-3730</link>
		<dc:creator>nounours18200</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=947#comment-3730</guid>
		<description>I have been waiting for the replacement of the 400/5.6L for a too long time....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been waiting for the replacement of the 400/5.6L for a too long time&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablov</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/eos-lenses-at-pma-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-3715</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 05:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=947#comment-3715</guid>
		<description>Is there any sign, clue or anything about a EOS 3D ???

I wonder its specs, and if it offers full manual control in Movie mode. 
I could be really interested on it....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any sign, clue or anything about a EOS 3D ???</p>
<p>I wonder its specs, and if it offers full manual control in Movie mode.<br />
I could be really interested on it&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeeWee</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/eos-lenses-at-pma-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-3706</link>
		<dc:creator>DeeWee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=947#comment-3706</guid>
		<description>ROFL @ bluetooth/wifi flash sync. What&#039;s the sync time of that, 1 second or slower?

Click button
...
wait for it...
wait for it...

there goes the flash</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ROFL @ bluetooth/wifi flash sync. What&#8217;s the sync time of that, 1 second or slower?</p>
<p>Click button<br />
&#8230;<br />
wait for it&#8230;<br />
wait for it&#8230;</p>
<p>there goes the flash</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/eos-lenses-at-pma-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-3701</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=947#comment-3701</guid>
		<description>I sent an email to Yoroku Adachi President &amp; CEO
Canon U.S.A., Inc. stating that delaying the release of the 500D would be a mistake as plenty of people are willing to buy it now. If anyone else is interested in emailing as well assemble this address: Y Adachi at Canonusa dot com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sent an email to Yoroku Adachi President &amp; CEO<br />
Canon U.S.A., Inc. stating that delaying the release of the 500D would be a mistake as plenty of people are willing to buy it now. If anyone else is interested in emailing as well assemble this address: Y Adachi at Canonusa dot com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/eos-lenses-at-pma-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-3697</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=947#comment-3697</guid>
		<description>My vote would be for a 24-70 2.8 IS and a 35 II or Redone T/S 24.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My vote would be for a 24-70 2.8 IS and a 35 II or Redone T/S 24.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/eos-lenses-at-pma-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-3694</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=947#comment-3694</guid>
		<description>The 100-400 is already plenty-sharp.
People complaining about IQ are 300% pixel peepers.

It&#039;d be nice to have it updated with a faster aperture, newer IS and better AF system, but the IQ is already top notch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 100-400 is already plenty-sharp.<br />
People complaining about IQ are 300% pixel peepers.</p>
<p>It&#8217;d be nice to have it updated with a faster aperture, newer IS and better AF system, but the IQ is already top notch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/eos-lenses-at-pma-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-3672</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=947#comment-3672</guid>
		<description>EF-S 55-150mm F/2.8 IS USM is the lens that is missing in the Canon Lens catalog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EF-S 55-150mm F/2.8 IS USM is the lens that is missing in the Canon Lens catalog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/eos-lenses-at-pma-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-3670</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=947#comment-3670</guid>
		<description>@bryan - havent we already got one of those? :o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@bryan &#8211; havent we already got one of those? :o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/eos-lenses-at-pma-cr3/comment-page-1/#comment-3667</link>
		<dc:creator>bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 07:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=947#comment-3667</guid>
		<description>hope that it will be the 24-70 f/2.8L USM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hope that it will be the 24-70 f/2.8L USM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
