<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speedlite 300EX [CR2]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/speedlite-300ex-cr2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/speedlite-300ex-cr2/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jocelyn</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/speedlite-300ex-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-30483</link>
		<dc:creator>Jocelyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=917#comment-30483</guid>
		<description>I bought the SD110 (3.2MP) back in 2004 and decided it was time to upgrade this year as it was showing some age. The latest version of that same line is the SD1200. I have had it for a few weeks now and have a few observations. The SD1200 is much faster from the time you turn it on until it is ready to shoot as compared to the SD110. Next, the screen is far better than the one on the SD110. Very bright and readable even in sunlight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought the SD110 (3.2MP) back in 2004 and decided it was time to upgrade this year as it was showing some age. The latest version of that same line is the SD1200. I have had it for a few weeks now and have a few observations. The SD1200 is much faster from the time you turn it on until it is ready to shoot as compared to the SD110. Next, the screen is far better than the one on the SD110. Very bright and readable even in sunlight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canonfans</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/speedlite-300ex-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-3528</link>
		<dc:creator>canonfans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=917#comment-3528</guid>
		<description>we need radio or bluetooth trigger 

the wireless trigger is so unreliable now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we need radio or bluetooth trigger </p>
<p>the wireless trigger is so unreliable now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CYRN</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/speedlite-300ex-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-3387</link>
		<dc:creator>CYRN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=917#comment-3387</guid>
		<description>Not only slave, but if able to command like the ST-E2, that will be even cooler :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only slave, but if able to command like the ST-E2, that will be even cooler :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stark-Arts</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/speedlite-300ex-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-3385</link>
		<dc:creator>Stark-Arts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=917#comment-3385</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to see a small one that can slave...
that would make it a big step forward not only for g10/xsi folks but for people that need just some extra light with their 580&#039;s etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see a small one that can slave&#8230;<br />
that would make it a big step forward not only for g10/xsi folks but for people that need just some extra light with their 580&#8242;s etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s.dimitrov</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/speedlite-300ex-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-3382</link>
		<dc:creator>s.dimitrov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=917#comment-3382</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s about time! 
I tried a Nikon SB30 on the G10, that didn&#039;t work. 
Though it worked quite well on a Rebel, the 20D and a 40D.
Canon&#039;s current flashes are too awkward, and heavy, on the G10 shoe.
Didn&#039;t Metz  make a slim dedicated flash for the Canon?
sd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about time!<br />
I tried a Nikon SB30 on the G10, that didn&#8217;t work.<br />
Though it worked quite well on a Rebel, the 20D and a 40D.<br />
Canon&#8217;s current flashes are too awkward, and heavy, on the G10 shoe.<br />
Didn&#8217;t Metz  make a slim dedicated flash for the Canon?<br />
sd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kt</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/speedlite-300ex-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-3378</link>
		<dc:creator>kt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=917#comment-3378</guid>
		<description>It would be nice to see a comparable flash to the SB-400.  Right now any Canon flash seems a little ridiculous to put onto a G9/G10.  Heck, even a 430EXII on a Rebel XS would look overbearing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice to see a comparable flash to the SB-400.  Right now any Canon flash seems a little ridiculous to put onto a G9/G10.  Heck, even a 430EXII on a Rebel XS would look overbearing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sgemu</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/speedlite-300ex-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-3377</link>
		<dc:creator>sgemu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=917#comment-3377</guid>
		<description>hmm i think is very very plausible as the sx1 and sx10 would need a small but powerful flash to fit the bill. The current 220EX just doesn&#039;t do it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm i think is very very plausible as the sx1 and sx10 would need a small but powerful flash to fit the bill. The current 220EX just doesn&#8217;t do it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/42 queries in 0.009 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 433/434 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 16:54:27 -->
