<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anything Coming From Tamron? [CR2]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/anything-coming-from-tamron-cr2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/anything-coming-from-tamron-cr2/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:25:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: val yang</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/anything-coming-from-tamron-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-30659</link>
		<dc:creator>val yang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1281#comment-30659</guid>
		<description>Just returned from an overseas trip.
I saw the new Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 VC.  I was not allowed to bolt it to my camera.
Dealer had a 90 f/2 Macro. 
Also, saw the new 200-500 VC. It looks like Tamron improved the optics to max 5.6 vs 6.3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just returned from an overseas trip.<br />
I saw the new Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 VC.  I was not allowed to bolt it to my camera.<br />
Dealer had a 90 f/2 Macro.<br />
Also, saw the new 200-500 VC. It looks like Tamron improved the optics to max 5.6 vs 6.3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Kidd</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/anything-coming-from-tamron-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-5296</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Kidd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1281#comment-5296</guid>
		<description>I have 4 Tamron lenses now.  The 17-50mm f/2.8, 2 x 24-75mm f/2.8 and the 70-200mm f/2.8 all are great lenses for the money.  Tamron would do well if they got more in the prime lens market.  Canon is killing me with the cost of their prime lenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have 4 Tamron lenses now.  The 17-50mm f/2.8, 2 x 24-75mm f/2.8 and the 70-200mm f/2.8 all are great lenses for the money.  Tamron would do well if they got more in the prime lens market.  Canon is killing me with the cost of their prime lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarcelM</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/anything-coming-from-tamron-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4974</link>
		<dc:creator>MarcelM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1281#comment-4974</guid>
		<description>I own a Tamron 28-75 and not really waiting for an VC version because I have an 1D MKII which is heavy so an light lens like the 28-75 there is hardly any shake.

If you have an lighter camera like then it is it a good choice because they a lot lighter and I even can keep those completely still.

I have also an 70-200 IS from Canon and it is an really good lense and IS helping to take the shots without needing an mono-pod.

More than 95% of the pictures I take are with the 28-75 so I am a big fan of this Tamron lense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own a Tamron 28-75 and not really waiting for an VC version because I have an 1D MKII which is heavy so an light lens like the 28-75 there is hardly any shake.</p>
<p>If you have an lighter camera like then it is it a good choice because they a lot lighter and I even can keep those completely still.</p>
<p>I have also an 70-200 IS from Canon and it is an really good lense and IS helping to take the shots without needing an mono-pod.</p>
<p>More than 95% of the pictures I take are with the 28-75 so I am a big fan of this Tamron lense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/anything-coming-from-tamron-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4891</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1281#comment-4891</guid>
		<description>More details on the tamron website:

70-200: http://www.tamron.com/lenses/prod/70200_di.asp

I think you can change it to CR5 ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More details on the tamron website:</p>
<p>70-200: <a href="http://www.tamron.com/lenses/prod/70200_di.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.tamron.com/lenses/prod/70200_di.asp</a></p>
<p>I think you can change it to CR5 ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/anything-coming-from-tamron-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4863</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1281#comment-4863</guid>
		<description>24-75 f2.8  VC or no VC put me on the waiting list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>24-75 f2.8  VC or no VC put me on the waiting list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/anything-coming-from-tamron-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4833</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1281#comment-4833</guid>
		<description>hummmm..... thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hummmm&#8230;.. thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon Rumors</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/anything-coming-from-tamron-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4821</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1281#comment-4821</guid>
		<description>Posted... Dedicated to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted&#8230; Dedicated to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/anything-coming-from-tamron-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4820</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1281#comment-4820</guid>
		<description>Sorry man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/anything-coming-from-tamron-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4819</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1281#comment-4819</guid>
		<description>Sorry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon Rumors</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/anything-coming-from-tamron-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4818</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1281#comment-4818</guid>
		<description>Dude, I need time to type!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, I need time to type!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/anything-coming-from-tamron-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4817</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1281#comment-4817</guid>
		<description>Wake up CR man!

New powershots coming!

http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ProductCatIndexAct&amp;fcategoryid=113</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wake up CR man!</p>
<p>New powershots coming!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ProductCatIndexAct&amp;fcategoryid=113" rel="nofollow">http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ProductCatIndexAct&amp;fcategoryid=113</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxs</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/anything-coming-from-tamron-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4816</link>
		<dc:creator>maxs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1281#comment-4816</guid>
		<description>woopie :P  ... anyone see anything from Canon... doesn&#039;t look like there is anything new on the US site (at least in dSLR dept).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>woopie :P  &#8230; anyone see anything from Canon&#8230; doesn&#8217;t look like there is anything new on the US site (at least in dSLR dept).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/anything-coming-from-tamron-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4814</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1281#comment-4814</guid>
		<description>btw I guess that Fuji, Samsung and Sony must&#039;ve read the 17 feb announcement rumor since they&#039;ve all just unveiled a dozen or so P&amp;S...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw I guess that Fuji, Samsung and Sony must&#8217;ve read the 17 feb announcement rumor since they&#8217;ve all just unveiled a dozen or so P&amp;S&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/anything-coming-from-tamron-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4803</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1281#comment-4803</guid>
		<description>Yes. VC = vibration compensation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. VC = vibration compensation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
