Comments on: Canon Launches New Pro Pixma Printers [CR5]

By: Framkallning

Framkallning — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:39:47 +0000

Hey, that was without a doubt an awesome post. I had actually been searching for a photo printing related blog for a while now. Thanks! Do you offer a subscription service? because I can’t seem to locate the information anywhere.

By: Moviebarrym

Moviebarrym — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:06:23 +0000

defeniately favorited

By: Lio@Cheap Printer Ink Cartridges

Lio@Cheap Printer Ink Cartridges — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:01:35 +0000

Hope it got more features that has something to do with images i.e. adjusting brightness or something. Brand new printers but old digicams still a fail.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:14:44 +0000

I would buy a new version if they came out with larger ink tanks for the same money …Jim

By: Mike

Mike — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:17:28 +0000

I own a PIXMA Pro9000 Mark I and I can’t imagine how these could be any better.

By: too many Rebels

too many Rebels — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:58:58 +0000

I like A3 printer, if price is cheaper

By: Canon PIXMA pro9500 and pro9000 Mark II upgrades imminent? | Whats New? Tech Reviews

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:52:30 +0000

[...] HK via canonrumors [...]

By: Canon lancia nuove stampanti fotografiche PIXMA | Comunicati stampa Versiliainrete news

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:03:39 +0000

[...] Via | CanonRumors [...]

By: Awesome, not really

Awesome, not really — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:55:24 +0000

My new epson is solid.

By: Ed

Ed — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:23:30 +0000

Is a inkjet worthwhile? I haven’t used one for a few years, and at that time, the ink would disolve into a mess if a drop of water fell on it, and the prints faded in a few weeks or months. The cost of ink was also way high. I do have a Epson Photo printer that I only use to print on DVD’s or CD’s, but haven’t even tried it on photo paper. It gets pulled out of the closet once or twice a year when I have a CD or DVD project and want to print on several disks.

I realize that the pigment inks now available are much more permanent, but the last Canon bubble jet I had put some sort of a worthless clear coat over the ink, but a drop of water still messed the print up.

I have two xerox phaser 6200′s for everyday printing and they do a passable job on informal photos and prints them very quickly. I also have a Kodak Dyesub that makes permanent photo prints when I want really nice ones. I’ve managed to find paper and ink kits for it at a fraction of new price. I can also take prints to Costco. ICC profiles are available for the printers they use, and prints are cheap when you only want one.

By: sirimiri

sirimiri — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:17:49 +0000

I’m not sure I see the upgrade to the Pixma 9000/9500 here. That’s to say, it seems like firmware or software upgrades for RAW direct print, or interfacing with Photoshop CS4 more directly?

For what it’s worth, in the US these printers were quite cheap if you purchased one on rebate. I purchased the 9500 for $350 after rebate. (It became even cheaper after that, too)

By: Bart

Bart — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:12:39 +0000

Can anyboth tell from the “specs” what really is improved??
Sounds like a lot bla bla bla. (better, faster, enhanced, superb etc etc)

By: Adam

Adam — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:46:18 +0000

Yeah but a lot of online printing is rubbish.
That’s like shooting jpeg – trusting someone/something else to make the decisions for you.

I’d much rather have full control over the whole process.

By: Rox

Rox — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:40:29 +0000

Any price idea, I wasn’t lucky enough to find out