<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon USA Drops TS-E 24mm From Site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/canon-usa-drops-ts-e-24mm-from-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/canon-usa-drops-ts-e-24mm-from-site/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon Rumors</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/canon-usa-drops-ts-e-24mm-from-site/comment-page-1/#comment-4306</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1058#comment-4306</guid>
		<description>Canon&#039;s 35 f/2 is small, fast, light and cheap. Why does it need to be EF-S?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon&#8217;s 35 f/2 is small, fast, light and cheap. Why does it need to be EF-S?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yitzy</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/canon-usa-drops-ts-e-24mm-from-site/comment-page-1/#comment-4302</link>
		<dc:creator>Yitzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1058#comment-4302</guid>
		<description>I want an ef-s prime that will be smaller, faster and cheaper...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want an ef-s prime that will be smaller, faster and cheaper&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sgemu</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/canon-usa-drops-ts-e-24mm-from-site/comment-page-1/#comment-4301</link>
		<dc:creator>sgemu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1058#comment-4301</guid>
		<description>Why do Nikon Users have to come in an hijack this thread? For goodness sake, it is just a rumors website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do Nikon Users have to come in an hijack this thread? For goodness sake, it is just a rumors website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon Rumors</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/canon-usa-drops-ts-e-24mm-from-site/comment-page-1/#comment-4299</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 12:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1058#comment-4299</guid>
		<description>Hey, I&#039;d be interested in an improved 24mm TS.

A DX Prime? That concept makes no sense to me. Why not just make a new 35 1.8?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I&#8217;d be interested in an improved 24mm TS.</p>
<p>A DX Prime? That concept makes no sense to me. Why not just make a new 35 1.8?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Bentsen</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/canon-usa-drops-ts-e-24mm-from-site/comment-page-1/#comment-4298</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Bentsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 10:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1058#comment-4298</guid>
		<description>&quot;Who cares about a TS lens&quot;

All potential TS buyers - obviously!

&quot;Nikons are getting a DX prime (35 1.8)!!!&quot;

Who cares about non-full frame lenses? Eventually, everything will full frame anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Who cares about a TS lens&#8221;</p>
<p>All potential TS buyers &#8211; obviously!</p>
<p>&#8220;Nikons are getting a DX prime (35 1.8)!!!&#8221;</p>
<p>Who cares about non-full frame lenses? Eventually, everything will full frame anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yitzy</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/canon-usa-drops-ts-e-24mm-from-site/comment-page-1/#comment-4297</link>
		<dc:creator>Yitzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 08:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1058#comment-4297</guid>
		<description>Who cares about a TS lens,
Nikons are getting a DX prime (35 1.8)!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares about a TS lens,<br />
Nikons are getting a DX prime (35 1.8)!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: And you know that Nikon D400 will coming out soon... &#124; Nikon Rumors</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/canon-usa-drops-ts-e-24mm-from-site/comment-page-1/#comment-4295</link>
		<dc:creator>And you know that Nikon D400 will coming out soon... &#124; Nikon Rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 05:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1058#comment-4295</guid>
		<description>[...] Photokina, so the D400 could be released before PMA,Ã‚Â especiallyÃ‚Â since Canon is expected to Ã‚Â release new products as well in the next 2 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Photokina, so the D400 could be released before PMA,Ã‚Â especiallyÃ‚Â since Canon is expected to Ã‚Â release new products as well in the next 2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashish</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/canon-usa-drops-ts-e-24mm-from-site/comment-page-1/#comment-4293</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 18:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1058#comment-4293</guid>
		<description>Maybe someone at Canon US is simply playing a teaser given all the rumors. Removing a TS-E entry for few days is perhaps the easiest one ;-)
I have seen this happening with other lenses earlier, so this may not be a giveaway. Though, the rumor can always turn out to be true (that is why we lurk here, lol)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe someone at Canon US is simply playing a teaser given all the rumors. Removing a TS-E entry for few days is perhaps the easiest one ;-)<br />
I have seen this happening with other lenses earlier, so this may not be a giveaway. Though, the rumor can always turn out to be true (that is why we lurk here, lol)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/canon-usa-drops-ts-e-24mm-from-site/comment-page-1/#comment-4288</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 09:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1058#comment-4288</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if this is indicative, Canon Australia for example hasn&#039;t had the 85 f/1.8 listed for over a year now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if this is indicative, Canon Australia for example hasn&#8217;t had the 85 f/1.8 listed for over a year now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/44 queries in 0.082 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 463/464 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 22:54:13 -->
