<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is That All? The Good &amp; Bad of a Rumors Site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/is-that-all-the-good-bad-of-a-rumors-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/is-that-all-the-good-bad-of-a-rumors-site/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruben</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/is-that-all-the-good-bad-of-a-rumors-site/comment-page-1/#comment-5263</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1388#comment-5263</guid>
		<description>It is a pitty that there is no new lens 100-400. 

But look on the bright site.... In the Netherlands the pricelist is renewed and there is still a 100-400 4.0 L IS USM on there!!!!!!! So hopefully it will arrive in the near near future.

Link: http://www.canon.nl/Images/Canon%20CCI%20advies%20prijslijst%20februari%202009_tcm16-621024.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a pitty that there is no new lens 100-400. </p>
<p>But look on the bright site&#8230;. In the Netherlands the pricelist is renewed and there is still a 100-400 4.0 L IS USM on there!!!!!!! So hopefully it will arrive in the near near future.</p>
<p>Link: <a href="http://www.canon.nl/Images/Canon%20CCI%20advies%20prijslijst%20februari%202009_tcm16-621024.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.canon.nl/Images/Canon%20CCI%20advies%20prijslijst%20februari%202009_tcm16-621024.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorkage</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/is-that-all-the-good-bad-of-a-rumors-site/comment-page-1/#comment-5177</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorkage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1388#comment-5177</guid>
		<description>D3X review up on dpreview.com.

Interesting they complain the focus points are concentrated in the center of the frame. I remember people complaining about the 5D2 cited Nikon as being better for this. 

Also to note on this $8,000 camera, 5fps (for full frame), no dust removal system and high ISO performance not quite up the 5D2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D3X review up on dpreview.com.</p>
<p>Interesting they complain the focus points are concentrated in the center of the frame. I remember people complaining about the 5D2 cited Nikon as being better for this. </p>
<p>Also to note on this $8,000 camera, 5fps (for full frame), no dust removal system and high ISO performance not quite up the 5D2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/is-that-all-the-good-bad-of-a-rumors-site/comment-page-1/#comment-5176</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1388#comment-5176</guid>
		<description>Will Canon ever release a full-frame camera that can shoot above 5fps???

Nikon already has 2. The switch to Nikon seems reasonable for a lot of people now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will Canon ever release a full-frame camera that can shoot above 5fps???</p>
<p>Nikon already has 2. The switch to Nikon seems reasonable for a lot of people now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/is-that-all-the-good-bad-of-a-rumors-site/comment-page-1/#comment-5172</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1388#comment-5172</guid>
		<description>http://www.red.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.red.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.red.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dil</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/is-that-all-the-good-bad-of-a-rumors-site/comment-page-1/#comment-5170</link>
		<dc:creator>Dil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1388#comment-5170</guid>
		<description>canon is my &quot;favourite&quot; in all way.. i want to buy my first DSRL canon 450d but nikon d90 sounds good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>canon is my &#8220;favourite&#8221; in all way.. i want to buy my first DSRL canon 450d but nikon d90 sounds good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stark-Arts</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/is-that-all-the-good-bad-of-a-rumors-site/comment-page-1/#comment-5151</link>
		<dc:creator>Stark-Arts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1388#comment-5151</guid>
		<description>the reason i said to buy a 1DS3 is that you complained about AF speed...
As for me falling blindly - I sold my 1D2 and bought a d700 with 24-70 2.8 while i waited to see what the 5D2 would be...
I now shoot the 5D2 with my L glass and I&#039;m quite happy...quite
And as heavybarrel stated - check out the nikon boards and they complain constantly as well..just like you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the reason i said to buy a 1DS3 is that you complained about AF speed&#8230;<br />
As for me falling blindly &#8211; I sold my 1D2 and bought a d700 with 24-70 2.8 while i waited to see what the 5D2 would be&#8230;<br />
I now shoot the 5D2 with my L glass and I&#8217;m quite happy&#8230;quite<br />
And as heavybarrel stated &#8211; check out the nikon boards and they complain constantly as well..just like you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heavybarrel</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/is-that-all-the-good-bad-of-a-rumors-site/comment-page-1/#comment-5147</link>
		<dc:creator>heavybarrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1388#comment-5147</guid>
		<description>Hehe I was talking about fantasy I guess... that f/2 would be twice as heavy as the 2.8 probably. But I would sit here and figure out a way to buy one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe I was talking about fantasy I guess&#8230; that f/2 would be twice as heavy as the 2.8 probably. But I would sit here and figure out a way to buy one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heavybarrel</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/is-that-all-the-good-bad-of-a-rumors-site/comment-page-1/#comment-5146</link>
		<dc:creator>heavybarrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1388#comment-5146</guid>
		<description>So... one company is giving it&#039;s shooters what they want right now and it&#039;s not Canon but you went back to your old 5D? Doesn&#039;t that make you part of the lazy flock? Who is the one company anyways?

Checking the Nikon blogs shows a lot of people whining about their choice of equipment too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; one company is giving it&#8217;s shooters what they want right now and it&#8217;s not Canon but you went back to your old 5D? Doesn&#8217;t that make you part of the lazy flock? Who is the one company anyways?</p>
<p>Checking the Nikon blogs shows a lot of people whining about their choice of equipment too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/is-that-all-the-good-bad-of-a-rumors-site/comment-page-1/#comment-5138</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 02:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1388#comment-5138</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious what&#039;s going on with the 35mm f/2. It&#039;s back-ordered everywhere I&#039;ve checked, other than amazon, where they have a whopping 2 in stock. For those of us on a budget, this would be a nice one to have, but not if they&#039;re no longer being made!

What do you all think - update, or just slow manufacturing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious what&#8217;s going on with the 35mm f/2. It&#8217;s back-ordered everywhere I&#8217;ve checked, other than amazon, where they have a whopping 2 in stock. For those of us on a budget, this would be a nice one to have, but not if they&#8217;re no longer being made!</p>
<p>What do you all think &#8211; update, or just slow manufacturing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxs</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/is-that-all-the-good-bad-of-a-rumors-site/comment-page-1/#comment-5134</link>
		<dc:creator>maxs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1388#comment-5134</guid>
		<description>yea...F2 and F4 zooms... no thanks.... did you see the prices on those TS-E lenses? I bet they are sweet but how many are going to bite at those prices... the 100-400/4 will be huge and cost as much as the nikon 200-400/4 ....that&#039;s simply a different product category then the current 100-400... why not make it a 200-500/5.6... a bit more expensive than the current lens but still reasonabl ish  .... now for the 24-70/2  I wish but I also have to wonder how much that is going to set you back...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea&#8230;F2 and F4 zooms&#8230; no thanks&#8230;. did you see the prices on those TS-E lenses? I bet they are sweet but how many are going to bite at those prices&#8230; the 100-400/4 will be huge and cost as much as the nikon 200-400/4 &#8230;.that&#8217;s simply a different product category then the current 100-400&#8230; why not make it a 200-500/5.6&#8230; a bit more expensive than the current lens but still reasonabl ish  &#8230;. now for the 24-70/2  I wish but I also have to wonder how much that is going to set you back&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxs</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/is-that-all-the-good-bad-of-a-rumors-site/comment-page-1/#comment-5132</link>
		<dc:creator>maxs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1388#comment-5132</guid>
		<description>just picked up a 5D from Henry&#039;s on ebay.... a hair over 1100 got it shipped to the US with all original accessories and got me a 2 year warranty.. from the serial number it looks like an 07/08 camera and from the pictures its in excellent condition (and the warranty is there to back it up :D ).... didn&#039;t think I&#039;d be leaving crop factor this soon but at these prices... good time to jump into a nice, lightly used camera unless there is something you really want in one of the new models (frankly I tried a 50D and that was sold and the older 5D is now on the way... )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just picked up a 5D from Henry&#8217;s on ebay&#8230;. a hair over 1100 got it shipped to the US with all original accessories and got me a 2 year warranty.. from the serial number it looks like an 07/08 camera and from the pictures its in excellent condition (and the warranty is there to back it up :D )&#8230;. didn&#8217;t think I&#8217;d be leaving crop factor this soon but at these prices&#8230; good time to jump into a nice, lightly used camera unless there is something you really want in one of the new models (frankly I tried a 50D and that was sold and the older 5D is now on the way&#8230; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heavybarrel</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/is-that-all-the-good-bad-of-a-rumors-site/comment-page-1/#comment-5129</link>
		<dc:creator>Heavybarrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1388#comment-5129</guid>
		<description>ya that&#039;s true. I just hope Canon is saving their money and cranking out a 24-70 f/2 and a 100-400 f/4. That&#039;ll get my blood racing. They must have had those TS lenses in development for a while because it seems like an odd time to bring out such a niche product when there&#039;s so much quality competition coming from other areas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ya that&#8217;s true. I just hope Canon is saving their money and cranking out a 24-70 f/2 and a 100-400 f/4. That&#8217;ll get my blood racing. They must have had those TS lenses in development for a while because it seems like an odd time to bring out such a niche product when there&#8217;s so much quality competition coming from other areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/is-that-all-the-good-bad-of-a-rumors-site/comment-page-1/#comment-5128</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1388#comment-5128</guid>
		<description>Haha. If I had 6 months to live I would be taking pictures right now and not posting on this board (no offense CR.. this is a fun site).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha. If I had 6 months to live I would be taking pictures right now and not posting on this board (no offense CR.. this is a fun site).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photographer/Videographer</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/is-that-all-the-good-bad-of-a-rumors-site/comment-page-1/#comment-5126</link>
		<dc:creator>Photographer/Videographer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1388#comment-5126</guid>
		<description>WHEN WOULD CANON RELEASE A 3D OR FULL FRAME DSLR WITH FULL MANUAL CONTROL IN MOVIE MODE?

THERE ARE SO MANY PEOPLE REQUESTING THAT...

IF CANON DOESN&#039;T, I HOPE NIKON DOES IT, SO CANON WOULD FEEL PRESSURE TO FOLLOW...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHEN WOULD CANON RELEASE A 3D OR FULL FRAME DSLR WITH FULL MANUAL CONTROL IN MOVIE MODE?</p>
<p>THERE ARE SO MANY PEOPLE REQUESTING THAT&#8230;</p>
<p>IF CANON DOESN&#8217;T, I HOPE NIKON DOES IT, SO CANON WOULD FEEL PRESSURE TO FOLLOW&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/49 queries in 0.014 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 538/539 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 23:24:51 -->
