<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TS-E 17 f/4L &amp; TS-E 24 f/3.5L II [CR4]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/ts-e-17mm-ts-e-24mm-cr2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/ts-e-17mm-ts-e-24mm-cr2/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/ts-e-17mm-ts-e-24mm-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-5133</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1314#comment-5133</guid>
		<description>The prices look higher on other sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The prices look higher on other sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/ts-e-17mm-ts-e-24mm-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-5131</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1314#comment-5131</guid>
		<description>How can 17mm and 24mm be to similar? Maby if I ask my mother...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can 17mm and 24mm be to similar? Maby if I ask my mother&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghee</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/ts-e-17mm-ts-e-24mm-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4941</link>
		<dc:creator>ghee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1314#comment-4941</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m extremely excited by these two lenses, and being an architectural photographer want both of them, just need to get a lot of work to pay for them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m extremely excited by these two lenses, and being an architectural photographer want both of them, just need to get a lot of work to pay for them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrÃƒÂ©s</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/ts-e-17mm-ts-e-24mm-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4920</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrÃƒÂ©s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1314#comment-4920</guid>
		<description>Good job Canon Rumors!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job Canon Rumors!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TT</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/ts-e-17mm-ts-e-24mm-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4917</link>
		<dc:creator>TT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1314#comment-4917</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s official!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s official!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sure</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/ts-e-17mm-ts-e-24mm-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4909</link>
		<dc:creator>Sure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1314#comment-4909</guid>
		<description>Yeah, because everyone buys a t/s lens to reproduce a gimmicky look.

Nevermind people who want to shoot architecture with correct perspective or any sort of work where increasing the apparent depth of field is desired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, because everyone buys a t/s lens to reproduce a gimmicky look.</p>
<p>Nevermind people who want to shoot architecture with correct perspective or any sort of work where increasing the apparent depth of field is desired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/ts-e-17mm-ts-e-24mm-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4905</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1314#comment-4905</guid>
		<description>*yawn* 

Vincent Laforet killed it with the T/S, anything else from this point on will just be an imitation of his work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*yawn* </p>
<p>Vincent Laforet killed it with the T/S, anything else from this point on will just be an imitation of his work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Eckersley &#187; Blog Archive &#187; TS-E 17mm F/4L</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/ts-e-17mm-ts-e-24mm-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4904</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Eckersley &#187; Blog Archive &#187; TS-E 17mm F/4L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1314#comment-4904</guid>
		<description>[...] CanonRumors are reporting (via Achatzi, an Authorized Canon of Germany reseller) that a TS-E 17mm F/4L is due to be announced at PMA next week. They even have pictures to &#8220;prove&#8221; this&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CanonRumors are reporting (via Achatzi, an Authorized Canon of Germany reseller) that a TS-E 17mm F/4L is due to be announced at PMA next week. They even have pictures to &#8220;prove&#8221; this&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxs</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/ts-e-17mm-ts-e-24mm-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4899</link>
		<dc:creator>maxs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1314#comment-4899</guid>
		<description>id also like to see the 45 redesigned... as an L and as a macro... i think that would be a one lens killer on FF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>id also like to see the 45 redesigned&#8230; as an L and as a macro&#8230; i think that would be a one lens killer on FF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Awesome, not really</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/ts-e-17mm-ts-e-24mm-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4897</link>
		<dc:creator>Awesome, not really</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1314#comment-4897</guid>
		<description>Boring...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boring&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RS</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/ts-e-17mm-ts-e-24mm-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4896</link>
		<dc:creator>RS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1314#comment-4896</guid>
		<description>On the German forum, Martin Achatzi added:

&quot;Randscharf auch total verschwenkt bei offenster Blende, kein roter Bereich mehr.&quot;

Translation: Sharp to the frame edges even with full shift at maximum aperture. There&#039;s no longer a red zone on the tilt/shift scales.

It&#039;s interesting to see in the photos of the two lenses that there doesn&#039;t appear to be a tilt scale on the 24mm while there is on the 17...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the German forum, Martin Achatzi added:</p>
<p>&#8220;Randscharf auch total verschwenkt bei offenster Blende, kein roter Bereich mehr.&#8221;</p>
<p>Translation: Sharp to the frame edges even with full shift at maximum aperture. There&#8217;s no longer a red zone on the tilt/shift scales.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting to see in the photos of the two lenses that there doesn&#8217;t appear to be a tilt scale on the 24mm while there is on the 17&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/ts-e-17mm-ts-e-24mm-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4893</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1314#comment-4893</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the focusing distance in meters... 

Going from 0.25, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.7, 1, 3, and then infinity. (The green text is it in feet)

The photos look too complicated to be faked. If they are fakes, thats some amazing work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the focusing distance in meters&#8230; </p>
<p>Going from 0.25, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.7, 1, 3, and then infinity. (The green text is it in feet)</p>
<p>The photos look too complicated to be faked. If they are fakes, thats some amazing work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 24-70 IS</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/ts-e-17mm-ts-e-24mm-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4892</link>
		<dc:creator>24-70 IS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1314#comment-4892</guid>
		<description>17 is great, but when 17 coming will renew 24 tilt be good idea? it will be a marketing nightmare, these two lenses are too similar to one another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>17 is great, but when 17 coming will renew 24 tilt be good idea? it will be a marketing nightmare, these two lenses are too similar to one another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pmad</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/ts-e-17mm-ts-e-24mm-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-4888</link>
		<dc:creator>Pmad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 01:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1314#comment-4888</guid>
		<description>This is all true...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all true&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/49 queries in 0.014 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 538/539 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 17:50:28 -->
