Comments on: What’s Coming at the Announcements http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/whats-coming-at-the-announcments/ You gotta know Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: 5d mark II http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/whats-coming-at-the-announcments/comment-page-1/#comment-4255 5d mark II Fri, 06 Feb 2009 02:28:51 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1039#comment-4255 5D mark II has increased the safty shutter speed requirement i find i can only got sharp photo at 1/100 and above 5D mark II has increased the safty shutter speed requirement
i find i can only got sharp photo at 1/100 and above

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/whats-coming-at-the-announcments/comment-page-1/#comment-4254 Anonymous Fri, 06 Feb 2009 02:00:55 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1039#comment-4254 Did you miss the IS part of the new 50L request?? Doubt it'd be only a $100 premium though. Did you miss the IS part of the new 50L request?? Doubt it’d be only a $100 premium though.

]]> By: Bob http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/whats-coming-at-the-announcments/comment-page-1/#comment-4240 Bob Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:28:38 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1039#comment-4240 I would like to pay US$1 for it--though I'd also like a good instant rebate on top of that and a free extended warranty. The current one is retailing for US$1,400. Why would you "like to pay" more for the new one? (If you are a banker who just got a big performance bonus and you are wondering what to spend it on, I retract my question.) I would like to pay US$1 for it–though I’d also like a good instant rebate on top of that and a free extended warranty.

The current one is retailing for US$1,400. Why would you “like to pay” more for the new one? (If you are a banker who just got a big performance bonus and you are wondering what to spend it on, I retract my question.)

]]> By: foobar http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/whats-coming-at-the-announcments/comment-page-1/#comment-4235 foobar Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:45:44 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1039#comment-4235 I would have nothing against an EF version as long as Canon can keep the price down without sacrificing quality. I would have nothing against an EF version as long as Canon can keep the price down without sacrificing quality.

]]> By: Stark-Arts http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/whats-coming-at-the-announcments/comment-page-1/#comment-4231 Stark-Arts Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:19:22 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1039#comment-4231 it would be my wish that they NEVER build another efs lens. That lens you describe - why not just make it ef? before people say it would have to be so much bigger... 1. compare size of 17-55 2.8 with IS vs. 16-35 2.8 - not that much difference in size. the extra 20 mm would have come at a "damage" of maybe an extra inch...I really believe you could see a lens that would go from 20 - 85 or so in a lens not any bigger than a 24-70 if they wanted... 2. compare the size of the 70-200's with is and without same size. so the IS motors are tiny and don't take up much room... it would be my wish that they NEVER build another efs lens. That lens you describe – why not just make it ef? before people say it would have to be so much bigger…
1. compare size of 17-55 2.8 with IS vs. 16-35 2.8 – not that much difference in size. the extra 20 mm would have come at a “damage” of maybe an extra inch…I really believe you could see a lens that would go from 20 – 85 or so in a lens not any bigger than a 24-70 if they wanted…
2. compare the size of the 70-200′s with is and without
same size. so the IS motors are tiny and don’t take up much room…

]]> By: Bill http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/whats-coming-at-the-announcments/comment-page-1/#comment-4229 Bill Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:30:34 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1039#comment-4229 Optics are cheaper for smaller sensors and it's also easier to max out the tele end. The Pro 1 uses a "L-grade" lens. Optics are cheaper for smaller sensors and it’s also easier to max out the tele end. The Pro 1 uses a “L-grade” lens.

]]> By: 5d mark II http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/whats-coming-at-the-announcments/comment-page-1/#comment-4214 5d mark II Wed, 04 Feb 2009 02:07:50 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1039#comment-4214 50 1.2 IS L please i would like to pay US$1500 for it 50 1.2 IS L please
i would like to pay US$1500 for it

]]> By: denz http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/whats-coming-at-the-announcments/comment-page-1/#comment-4212 denz Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:55:44 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1039#comment-4212 if they want to launch P&S it is better if they use that 2/3" sensor CCD of Pro 1. if they want to launch P&S it is better if they use that 2/3″ sensor CCD of Pro 1.

]]> By: foobar http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/whats-coming-at-the-announcments/comment-page-1/#comment-4203 foobar Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:12:56 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1039#comment-4203 EF-S 17-85 f/4 IS USM? EF 28mm f/1.4 USM? ^^ Just dreaming... EF-S 17-85 f/4 IS USM?
EF 28mm f/1.4 USM?

^^

Just dreaming…

]]> By: Bill http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/whats-coming-at-the-announcments/comment-page-1/#comment-4200 Bill Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:35:57 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1039#comment-4200 well, Panasonic has managed to pull of quite nice 720p video in their mini chip cameras, so as long as the canons don't use cmos jelly sensors it'd probably be a good selling point. well, Panasonic has managed to pull of quite nice 720p video in their mini chip cameras, so as long as the canons don’t use cmos jelly sensors it’d probably be a good selling point.

]]> By: Nigel http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/whats-coming-at-the-announcments/comment-page-1/#comment-4198 Nigel Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:12:22 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1039#comment-4198 And what's the quality of HD from a chip no bigger than a fingernail. All sounds more like 'if it can be done it should be done' rather than 'should it be done?' And what’s the quality of HD from a chip no bigger than a fingernail. All sounds more like ‘if it can be done it should be done’ rather than ‘should it be done?’

]]> By: Joe http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/whats-coming-at-the-announcments/comment-page-1/#comment-4196 Joe Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:37:15 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1039#comment-4196 It looks like there will be no new DSLRs in PMA just like Pansonic and Nikon. However, if there is a new compact camera which can compete with TZ7, it's another step that Canon make -- HD movie in a point and shot. It looks like there will be no new DSLRs in PMA just like Pansonic and Nikon. However, if there is a new compact camera which can compete with TZ7, it’s another step that Canon make — HD movie in a point and shot.

]]> By: Mackenzie http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/whats-coming-at-the-announcments/comment-page-1/#comment-4195 Mackenzie Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:21:55 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1039#comment-4195 A 60D would sure be nice. But I'm betting on a crap-load of worthless compacts. A 60D would sure be nice.
But I’m betting on a crap-load of worthless compacts.

]]> By: Gusto http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/02/whats-coming-at-the-announcments/comment-page-1/#comment-4194 Gusto Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:10:45 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1039#comment-4194 Just look at what Nikon announced recently: a bunch of compact cameras. Just look at what Nikon announced recently: a bunch of compact cameras.

]]>