<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1Ds Mark III &amp; 1D Mark III AF Service &amp; Firmware Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-mark-iii-af-fix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-mark-iii-af-fix/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Okami</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-mark-iii-af-fix/comment-page-1/#comment-5770</link>
		<dc:creator>Okami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1472#comment-5770</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s how competition works (atleast you would hope)

I wish I could have all 4.... 1d/s III, D3/x</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s how competition works (atleast you would hope)</p>
<p>I wish I could have all 4&#8230;. 1d/s III, D3/x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: santa</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-mark-iii-af-fix/comment-page-1/#comment-5762</link>
		<dc:creator>santa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 04:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1472#comment-5762</guid>
		<description>For the sake of all the MKIII owners I&#039;m glad.  I got a MKII the moment it came out. I was in no hurry so I decided to wait on the MKIII and see what was up because I would have needed to sell my MKII. I&#039;m sure many current MKIII owners are glad they bought when they did and many made the right decision but personally I&#039;m glad I did not. I&#039;ll be betting they get the MKIV right the first time and I&#039;ll be ordering it as soon as it&#039;s available. X my fingers....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the sake of all the MKIII owners I&#8217;m glad.  I got a MKII the moment it came out. I was in no hurry so I decided to wait on the MKIII and see what was up because I would have needed to sell my MKII. I&#8217;m sure many current MKIII owners are glad they bought when they did and many made the right decision but personally I&#8217;m glad I did not. I&#8217;ll be betting they get the MKIV right the first time and I&#8217;ll be ordering it as soon as it&#8217;s available. X my fingers&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-mark-iii-af-fix/comment-page-1/#comment-5760</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 01:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1472#comment-5760</guid>
		<description>In the case of the autofocus, it is certain that Canon did not know what the problem was.  They discovered and fixed several things with regard to stationary subjects, but could not reproduce the problem of moving subjects after taking thousands of photos.  They asked for input from photographers as to what conditions were causing the problem.  It turns out that several conditions were needed.  Among them, very high temperatures and very bright sun or bright backlighting with a subject moving towards the camera while it was in AI servo mode.  The lens aperture needed to be wide open, or the problem might be masked by the depth of field.  Since many users were not photographing under these conditions, they were happy and did not see a problem.  The hardware and software involved is extremely complex, so I hope it is fixed now.

I&#039;m like you, I&#039;ve been holding off, and now that I have a 5D II which performs perfectly for me, I may not get a 1D series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the case of the autofocus, it is certain that Canon did not know what the problem was.  They discovered and fixed several things with regard to stationary subjects, but could not reproduce the problem of moving subjects after taking thousands of photos.  They asked for input from photographers as to what conditions were causing the problem.  It turns out that several conditions were needed.  Among them, very high temperatures and very bright sun or bright backlighting with a subject moving towards the camera while it was in AI servo mode.  The lens aperture needed to be wide open, or the problem might be masked by the depth of field.  Since many users were not photographing under these conditions, they were happy and did not see a problem.  The hardware and software involved is extremely complex, so I hope it is fixed now.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m like you, I&#8217;ve been holding off, and now that I have a 5D II which performs perfectly for me, I may not get a 1D series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-mark-iii-af-fix/comment-page-1/#comment-5751</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1472#comment-5751</guid>
		<description>Probably the 300 f4 IS photoshopped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably the 300 f4 IS photoshopped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-mark-iii-af-fix/comment-page-1/#comment-5749</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1472#comment-5749</guid>
		<description>I vote PS. That image shows the min. distace to be 1.5m where the 135L has 0.9m ... I doubt that would change. 

That and it looks fake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote PS. That image shows the min. distace to be 1.5m where the 135L has 0.9m &#8230; I doubt that would change. </p>
<p>That and it looks fake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-mark-iii-af-fix/comment-page-1/#comment-5740</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1472#comment-5740</guid>
		<description>&gt;the people whoÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s saying that canon have to release the new 1D are just waiting for the price drop of MKIII, i 100% bet that they will not buy the MKIV when it came out 

I 100% take that bet ... and will 100% take your money. I for one am waiting for the 1D4 for two reasons (1) the retail chain is depleted and the stock available may be of dubious vintage, and (2) after the time it&#039;s taken for Canon to iron out the issues with the 1D3, we&#039;re so close to the 1D4 as to make a little longer wait almost a no-brainer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;the people whoÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s saying that canon have to release the new 1D are just waiting for the price drop of MKIII, i 100% bet that they will not buy the MKIV when it came out </p>
<p>I 100% take that bet &#8230; and will 100% take your money. I for one am waiting for the 1D4 for two reasons (1) the retail chain is depleted and the stock available may be of dubious vintage, and (2) after the time it&#8217;s taken for Canon to iron out the issues with the 1D3, we&#8217;re so close to the 1D4 as to make a little longer wait almost a no-brainer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-mark-iii-af-fix/comment-page-1/#comment-5739</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1472#comment-5739</guid>
		<description>Niagara Falls was it not?

;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Niagara Falls was it not?</p>
<p>;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 70-200 IS II</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-mark-iii-af-fix/comment-page-1/#comment-5738</link>
		<dc:creator>70-200 IS II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1472#comment-5738</guid>
		<description>a pic is said to be 135L IS, not sure if it is psed
http://att.newsmth.net/att.php?p.179.697055.334.png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a pic is said to be 135L IS, not sure if it is psed<br />
<a href="http://att.newsmth.net/att.php?p.179.697055.334.png" rel="nofollow">http://att.newsmth.net/att.php?p.179.697055.334.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: denz</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-mark-iii-af-fix/comment-page-1/#comment-5723</link>
		<dc:creator>denz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1472#comment-5723</guid>
		<description>in this type of strategy both canon and 1D/s MKIII owners will benefit from it. the people who&#039;s saying that canon have to release the new 1D are just waiting for the price drop of MKIII, i 100% bet that they will not buy the MKIV when it came out and canon knows that. no MKIV until the stock of MKIII runs out, same with other models. some users are treating canon that if they didnt came up with new model they will switch to nikon, when you switch to other brands you have to sell all your gears, youre not reducing canon users then it will not affect the sales of canon. wake-up, canon is wiser than you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in this type of strategy both canon and 1D/s MKIII owners will benefit from it. the people who&#8217;s saying that canon have to release the new 1D are just waiting for the price drop of MKIII, i 100% bet that they will not buy the MKIV when it came out and canon knows that. no MKIV until the stock of MKIII runs out, same with other models. some users are treating canon that if they didnt came up with new model they will switch to nikon, when you switch to other brands you have to sell all your gears, youre not reducing canon users then it will not affect the sales of canon. wake-up, canon is wiser than you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon PowerShot SD970IS 12.1 MP Digital Camera with 5x Optical Zoom and 3.0-inch LCD LCD</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-mark-iii-af-fix/comment-page-1/#comment-5721</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon PowerShot SD970IS 12.1 MP Digital Camera with 5x Optical Zoom and 3.0-inch LCD LCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1472#comment-5721</guid>
		<description>[...] Canon Rumors Ã‚Â» Blog Archive Ã‚Â» 1D Mark III AF Fix [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canon Rumors Ã‚Â» Blog Archive Ã‚Â» 1D Mark III AF Fix [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ziggy</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-mark-iii-af-fix/comment-page-1/#comment-5720</link>
		<dc:creator>Ziggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1472#comment-5720</guid>
		<description>never mind, it works now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>never mind, it works now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ziggy</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-mark-iii-af-fix/comment-page-1/#comment-5718</link>
		<dc:creator>Ziggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 02:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1472#comment-5718</guid>
		<description>Is it just me, but I don&#039;t have any scroll bars on the Get the most out of the Mark III website.  Just seeing anyone else has this problem...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me, but I don&#8217;t have any scroll bars on the Get the most out of the Mark III website.  Just seeing anyone else has this problem&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KAS</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-mark-iii-af-fix/comment-page-1/#comment-5714</link>
		<dc:creator>KAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1472#comment-5714</guid>
		<description>I love new firmware updates....sometimes it&#039;s like getting a new camera!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love new firmware updates&#8230;.sometimes it&#8217;s like getting a new camera!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-mark-iii-af-fix/comment-page-1/#comment-5709</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1472#comment-5709</guid>
		<description>&gt; It seems like they have learned that fixing problems doesnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t bring more attention to the problem it gets people over the problem.

As long as the &#039;fix&#039; is just that, the fix. But to an outside who&#039;s put off buying the 1D3 in part because of the AF issue, it seems that Canon lurch from one fix to another. Almost like they don&#039;t really know what the root cause is. That doesn&#039;t exactly engender faith in prospective buyers.

Hopefully this time they&#039;ve nailed it. I do hope so for the owners of the cam. As for me, I&#039;ve put it off so long that I may as well wait for the 1D4 and not risk getting any old stock still scudding around in the retail chain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; It seems like they have learned that fixing problems doesnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t bring more attention to the problem it gets people over the problem.</p>
<p>As long as the &#8216;fix&#8217; is just that, the fix. But to an outside who&#8217;s put off buying the 1D3 in part because of the AF issue, it seems that Canon lurch from one fix to another. Almost like they don&#8217;t really know what the root cause is. That doesn&#8217;t exactly engender faith in prospective buyers.</p>
<p>Hopefully this time they&#8217;ve nailed it. I do hope so for the owners of the cam. As for me, I&#8217;ve put it off so long that I may as well wait for the 1D4 and not risk getting any old stock still scudding around in the retail chain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/49 queries in 0.038 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 538/539 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 16:29:51 -->
