<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1D Release 2010 Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-release-2010-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-release-2010-update/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:59:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: White Glass Warrior</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-release-2010-update/comment-page-1/#comment-5985</link>
		<dc:creator>White Glass Warrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1504#comment-5985</guid>
		<description>An iPhone has a touch screen camera. :)

Touch screen? Why do you want a high frame rate camera when you have to take your eye away from the viewfinder? I think the UI is almost good enough now. 

Heck, just make a Canon that has better focus and high ISO work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An iPhone has a touch screen camera. :)</p>
<p>Touch screen? Why do you want a high frame rate camera when you have to take your eye away from the viewfinder? I think the UI is almost good enough now. </p>
<p>Heck, just make a Canon that has better focus and high ISO work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-release-2010-update/comment-page-1/#comment-5983</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1504#comment-5983</guid>
		<description>Yes Please, yes please, yes please.
This would be my dream come true in both ways.

1) As stated in the post, I&#039;ll never get my boss to upgrade equipment in 2009. (Crisis? What crisis?) 2010 is much more likely, especially if the successor really delivers some resolution- and feature-benefit.

2) A merger of D and Ds into the finest frickin quality at insane speeds with ultra resolution and easy handling is ... unlikely. My wet dream but ... unlikely ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Please, yes please, yes please.<br />
This would be my dream come true in both ways.</p>
<p>1) As stated in the post, I&#8217;ll never get my boss to upgrade equipment in 2009. (Crisis? What crisis?) 2010 is much more likely, especially if the successor really delivers some resolution- and feature-benefit.</p>
<p>2) A merger of D and Ds into the finest frickin quality at insane speeds with ultra resolution and easy handling is &#8230; unlikely. My wet dream but &#8230; unlikely ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 70-200 IS II</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-release-2010-update/comment-page-1/#comment-5981</link>
		<dc:creator>70-200 IS II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1504#comment-5981</guid>
		<description>more important is lenses
i will never buy a 1D, what is for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more important is lenses<br />
i will never buy a 1D, what is for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-release-2010-update/comment-page-1/#comment-5980</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1504#comment-5980</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been hanging on hoping that Canon produces a full-frame fast camera, but it looks like it&#039;s not gonna happen anytime soon. Ever since I went digital I&#039;ve been wanting the full-frame, hi-frame rate camera. I still shoot sports (not editorial) for a chunk of my income and as a 15-year Canon user I&#039;m frustrated that it hasn&#039;t happened yet. The D3 has been out for well over a year (approaching a year and a half) and I just spent too many years looking through a full-frame camera to not prefer it. I use the 5d for portrait &amp; much doc work and still have 2 1dmkIIn, it looks like this year I will be making the reluctant switch to Nikon. 
s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been hanging on hoping that Canon produces a full-frame fast camera, but it looks like it&#8217;s not gonna happen anytime soon. Ever since I went digital I&#8217;ve been wanting the full-frame, hi-frame rate camera. I still shoot sports (not editorial) for a chunk of my income and as a 15-year Canon user I&#8217;m frustrated that it hasn&#8217;t happened yet. The D3 has been out for well over a year (approaching a year and a half) and I just spent too many years looking through a full-frame camera to not prefer it. I use the 5d for portrait &amp; much doc work and still have 2 1dmkIIn, it looks like this year I will be making the reluctant switch to Nikon.<br />
s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-release-2010-update/comment-page-1/#comment-5968</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1504#comment-5968</guid>
		<description>I swear I will switch systems if they make it a touchscreen.  that is such a terrible interface type for a camera, especially one where settings need to be changed on the fly, plus the menu layout is good, and fast with buttons dials, and the little joystick (multicontroller) touchscreen simply mucks up the screen and makes screwing up in menus easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I swear I will switch systems if they make it a touchscreen.  that is such a terrible interface type for a camera, especially one where settings need to be changed on the fly, plus the menu layout is good, and fast with buttons dials, and the little joystick (multicontroller) touchscreen simply mucks up the screen and makes screwing up in menus easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H3</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-release-2010-update/comment-page-1/#comment-5967</link>
		<dc:creator>H3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1504#comment-5967</guid>
		<description>To ppdix,

Shut up you fatso.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To ppdix,</p>
<p>Shut up you fatso.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorkage</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-release-2010-update/comment-page-1/#comment-5966</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorkage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1504#comment-5966</guid>
		<description>Ah, so maybe they should keep both cameras?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, so maybe they should keep both cameras?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ppdix</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-release-2010-update/comment-page-1/#comment-5965</link>
		<dc:creator>ppdix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1504#comment-5965</guid>
		<description>I want a huge touch screen... Mamiya has it already!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want a huge touch screen&#8230; Mamiya has it already!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-release-2010-update/comment-page-1/#comment-5957</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1504#comment-5957</guid>
		<description>Canon&#039;s strong point is the wide range of lenses they offer.  

Unfortunately, many of the designs are ageing and need to be refreshed.

I&#039;d rather see the priority be given to lenses rather than adding more MP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon&#8217;s strong point is the wide range of lenses they offer.  </p>
<p>Unfortunately, many of the designs are ageing and need to be refreshed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d rather see the priority be given to lenses rather than adding more MP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/1d-release-2010-update/comment-page-1/#comment-5955</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1504#comment-5955</guid>
		<description>&quot;The D3 has sold well, but hasnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t made a massive inroad into the pro world. ThereÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s been some switchers, but not as many as the internet community thinks. This is at least true in the areas of the planet I shootÃ¢â‚¬Â

In the UK, Reuters have part-exed all their Canon gear and gone Nikon. What does that tell you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The D3 has sold well, but hasnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t made a massive inroad into the pro world. ThereÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s been some switchers, but not as many as the internet community thinks. This is at least true in the areas of the planet I shootÃ¢â‚¬Â</p>
<p>In the UK, Reuters have part-exed all their Canon gear and gone Nikon. What does that tell you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
