<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon EOS Rebel T1i &#8211; Official</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-official/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-official/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:40:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Digitale Fotowelten &#8211; Die Canon EOS 500D kommt &#171; KC-Blog &#38; More</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-official/comment-page-1/#comment-26032</link>
		<dc:creator>Digitale Fotowelten &#8211; Die Canon EOS 500D kommt &#171; KC-Blog &#38; More</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1605#comment-26032</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-official/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-official/" rel="nofollow">http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-official/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t1ixsi</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-official/comment-page-1/#comment-7966</link>
		<dc:creator>t1ixsi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1605#comment-7966</guid>
		<description>canon t1i is good modify from canon xsi
i like</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>canon t1i is good modify from canon xsi<br />
i like</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-official/comment-page-1/#comment-7079</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1605#comment-7079</guid>
		<description>I greatly enjoy jog wheels as well.

However, as a former rebel user I can tell you that the 4 way pad on the back where the jog wheel should be is used to quickly access some very important camera functions, so I can accept them sticking with this design, especially since they menu has been simplified by putting it on different pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I greatly enjoy jog wheels as well.</p>
<p>However, as a former rebel user I can tell you that the 4 way pad on the back where the jog wheel should be is used to quickly access some very important camera functions, so I can accept them sticking with this design, especially since they menu has been simplified by putting it on different pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ALLAN</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-official/comment-page-1/#comment-7001</link>
		<dc:creator>ALLAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1605#comment-7001</guid>
		<description>IT SHOULD HAVE HAD A JOG WHEEL, HOW STUPID OF CANON TO HAVE LEFT IT OUT,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IT SHOULD HAVE HAD A JOG WHEEL, HOW STUPID OF CANON TO HAVE LEFT IT OUT,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ecco la Canon 500D/Rebel T1i &#124; 50 Millimetri &#124; Fotografia e dintorni</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-official/comment-page-1/#comment-7000</link>
		<dc:creator>Ecco la Canon 500D/Rebel T1i &#124; 50 Millimetri &#124; Fotografia e dintorni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1605#comment-7000</guid>
		<description>[...] news su Dcresource, Letsgodigital, Digital-Photography-School, Photographyblog, Canonrumors, 1001NoisyCameras e Dpreview  Post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] news su Dcresource, Letsgodigital, Digital-Photography-School, Photographyblog, Canonrumors, 1001NoisyCameras e Dpreview  Post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-official/comment-page-1/#comment-6937</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1605#comment-6937</guid>
		<description>In Europe several shops have initially priced it at around 
1000 euro, which is more or less the same as the D90 with a 18-105 or a D50 body, BUT...

the price is 1400 Euro in a kit with the 18-200. Which is around 50eur more expensive than a 50D with 18-200 and a few bucks more expensive than a D90 with 18-200 (which currently is being offered with a free battery grip in some countries). This is also the expected RP of the GH1...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Europe several shops have initially priced it at around<br />
1000 euro, which is more or less the same as the D90 with a 18-105 or a D50 body, BUT&#8230;</p>
<p>the price is 1400 Euro in a kit with the 18-200. Which is around 50eur more expensive than a 50D with 18-200 and a few bucks more expensive than a D90 with 18-200 (which currently is being offered with a free battery grip in some countries). This is also the expected RP of the GH1&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neue Kamera im Anflug &#171; der mac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-official/comment-page-1/#comment-6936</link>
		<dc:creator>Neue Kamera im Anflug &#171; der mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1605#comment-6936</guid>
		<description>[...] dass eine Canon EOS 450D ganz weit oben auf meiner Einkaufsliste steht. Heute hat Canon deren Nachfolger prÃƒÂ¤sentiert, der die ein oder andere Nettigkeit mitbringt. FÃƒÂ¼r mich wÃƒÂ¤ren dabei vor allem der hohe ISO-Wert [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dass eine Canon EOS 450D ganz weit oben auf meiner Einkaufsliste steht. Heute hat Canon deren Nachfolger prÃƒÂ¤sentiert, der die ein oder andere Nettigkeit mitbringt. FÃƒÂ¼r mich wÃƒÂ¤ren dabei vor allem der hohe ISO-Wert [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-official/comment-page-1/#comment-6935</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1605#comment-6935</guid>
		<description>Hey, I wasn&#039;t &quot;whining&quot; about the 500D as an update to the xxxD line, it&#039;s as good as a Rebel&#039;s likely to get. Who says anyone&#039;s expecting a 1D in a Rebel body for 800 bucks? It would be nice to have a 1D4 in a 1D body for however many bucks. Now, that would be &#039;best&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I wasn&#8217;t &#8220;whining&#8221; about the 500D as an update to the xxxD line, it&#8217;s as good as a Rebel&#8217;s likely to get. Who says anyone&#8217;s expecting a 1D in a Rebel body for 800 bucks? It would be nice to have a 1D4 in a 1D body for however many bucks. Now, that would be &#8216;best&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lancamento da DSLR Canon 500D ou Rebel T1i &#124; LoginStyle</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-official/comment-page-1/#comment-6909</link>
		<dc:creator>Lancamento da DSLR Canon 500D ou Rebel T1i &#124; LoginStyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1605#comment-6909</guid>
		<description>[...] quem le em ingles, tem muito mais informacoes sobre a nova Canon 500D aqui nesse Link e tambem aqui.Nao vi tanta diferenca quanto esperava, pelo menos nao exteriormente, ao que consta as melhorias [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] quem le em ingles, tem muito mais informacoes sobre a nova Canon 500D aqui nesse Link e tambem aqui.Nao vi tanta diferenca quanto esperava, pelo menos nao exteriormente, ao que consta as melhorias [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-official/comment-page-1/#comment-6906</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1605#comment-6906</guid>
		<description>I suspect that they are unable to pull data off the sensor fast enough to get 1080p at 30fps.  Don&#039;t expect a firmware update, it is almost certainly a hardware issue.  The 1080p/20 fps is probably useful for capturing images at a extremely fast rate, and then grabbing the lower resolution stills that do look pretty good on a monitor or small print.

Using 720P is the best way to go.  more recording time, easy to edit, and save to DVD.

1080P@30fps is not something that probably should not be there in a consumer level camera.    Most PC&#039;s won&#039;t handle it at all, software is starting to hit the market that will work fairly well with high end pc&#039;s.  

You can use a newer mac much more easily, but they cost more than a high end pc.  They play 1080P, but there are lots of issues in editing and saving back to 1080P, Quicktime compresses the blacks so that darker detail just disappears.  This is OK on a TV screen, but horrible on a monitor and very obvious when compared to a different codec.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that they are unable to pull data off the sensor fast enough to get 1080p at 30fps.  Don&#8217;t expect a firmware update, it is almost certainly a hardware issue.  The 1080p/20 fps is probably useful for capturing images at a extremely fast rate, and then grabbing the lower resolution stills that do look pretty good on a monitor or small print.</p>
<p>Using 720P is the best way to go.  more recording time, easy to edit, and save to DVD.</p>
<p>1080P@30fps is not something that probably should not be there in a consumer level camera.    Most PC&#8217;s won&#8217;t handle it at all, software is starting to hit the market that will work fairly well with high end pc&#8217;s.  </p>
<p>You can use a newer mac much more easily, but they cost more than a high end pc.  They play 1080P, but there are lots of issues in editing and saving back to 1080P, Quicktime compresses the blacks so that darker detail just disappears.  This is OK on a TV screen, but horrible on a monitor and very obvious when compared to a different codec.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
