<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Kit Lens? [CR2]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/new-kit-lens-cr2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/new-kit-lens-cr2/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 01:30:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/new-kit-lens-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-13273</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1576#comment-13273</guid>
		<description>The 18-55 IS is good enough as a kit lens.  Make the 18-120 or what ever this new lens will be an upgraded EF-S lens for people who want a quality walk around for a crop body, it could even replace the 17-85 but retain ring usm and metal mount and non-rotating front of that lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 18-55 IS is good enough as a kit lens.  Make the 18-120 or what ever this new lens will be an upgraded EF-S lens for people who want a quality walk around for a crop body, it could even replace the 17-85 but retain ring usm and metal mount and non-rotating front of that lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/new-kit-lens-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-13272</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1576#comment-13272</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t make it a kit lens the 18-55 IS is a good enough kit lens, made this and upgrade EF-S lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t make it a kit lens the 18-55 IS is a good enough kit lens, made this and upgrade EF-S lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/new-kit-lens-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-13270</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1576#comment-13270</guid>
		<description>Come on Canon new EF-S lens but stop using micro motors with the 18-200.  Nikon put USM in it&#039;s DX lens so you can put it in EF-S, The 18-200 EF-S would have been so much better if it had USM.

I though Canon said a few years back that it was committed to putting usm in all it&#039;s lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on Canon new EF-S lens but stop using micro motors with the 18-200.  Nikon put USM in it&#8217;s DX lens so you can put it in EF-S, The 18-200 EF-S would have been so much better if it had USM.</p>
<p>I though Canon said a few years back that it was committed to putting usm in all it&#8217;s lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/new-kit-lens-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-13269</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1576#comment-13269</guid>
		<description>It has to have ring USM and non rotating front.  Nikon do it with all there DX kit lens why can&#039;t Canon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has to have ring USM and non rotating front.  Nikon do it with all there DX kit lens why can&#8217;t Canon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/new-kit-lens-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-6626</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1576#comment-6626</guid>
		<description>lol well, consider me pwned then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol well, consider me pwned then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/new-kit-lens-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-6597</link>
		<dc:creator>gwac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1576#comment-6597</guid>
		<description>Both Pentax and Olympus sell kit lenses that are similarly priced without rotating front elements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both Pentax and Olympus sell kit lenses that are similarly priced without rotating front elements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: don</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/new-kit-lens-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-6592</link>
		<dc:creator>don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1576#comment-6592</guid>
		<description>It will be an EFS18-85 USM with full metal mounts 17-55 discontinued, same price point</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be an EFS18-85 USM with full metal mounts 17-55 discontinued, same price point</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michal</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/new-kit-lens-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-6581</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1576#comment-6581</guid>
		<description>I would not mind in-body stabilization despite the fact that I have spent a lot of money on 70-200 2.8 IS and will soon buy another IS zoom, I also have a few primes that I like (including my favourite 85mm 1.8) and IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢d love to have some kind of IS for them, even 1-, 2-stop one.  Face it, with 3-stop IS for 70-200 I can shoot 80mm at 1/25s easily, on the other hand with my 85mm prime I have to shoot at 1/100 or so (maybe a tad slower) to be sure of a sharp picture and a lot of aperture advantage that 85mm 1.8 had over 70-200 2.8 gets lost in the process.

2-stop IS system in the new 500D or whatever will come next (60D or whatever) would make me upgrade my Ã¢â‚¬Å“ancientÃ¢â‚¬Â 400D, I could not care less about a movie mode or some fancy articulated screens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not mind in-body stabilization despite the fact that I have spent a lot of money on 70-200 2.8 IS and will soon buy another IS zoom, I also have a few primes that I like (including my favourite 85mm 1.8) and IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢d love to have some kind of IS for them, even 1-, 2-stop one.  Face it, with 3-stop IS for 70-200 I can shoot 80mm at 1/25s easily, on the other hand with my 85mm prime I have to shoot at 1/100 or so (maybe a tad slower) to be sure of a sharp picture and a lot of aperture advantage that 85mm 1.8 had over 70-200 2.8 gets lost in the process.</p>
<p>2-stop IS system in the new 500D or whatever will come next (60D or whatever) would make me upgrade my Ã¢â‚¬Å“ancientÃ¢â‚¬Â 400D, I could not care less about a movie mode or some fancy articulated screens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/new-kit-lens-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-6572</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1576#comment-6572</guid>
		<description>You are proving my point. 


Your $150 kit lens will no longer cost $150 if you add a non rotating front element. I would expect it to double the cost at least.  The lens will no longer be a nice &quot;budget lens&quot; for your 1000d. If you want specific features... they cost money.


Turns out the 17-85 IS has a non rotating FE.  It is about 450 if memory serves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are proving my point. </p>
<p>Your $150 kit lens will no longer cost $150 if you add a non rotating front element. I would expect it to double the cost at least.  The lens will no longer be a nice &#8220;budget lens&#8221; for your 1000d. If you want specific features&#8230; they cost money.</p>
<p>Turns out the 17-85 IS has a non rotating FE.  It is about 450 if memory serves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brilliant!</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/new-kit-lens-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-6571</link>
		<dc:creator>Brilliant!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1576#comment-6571</guid>
		<description>Brilliant Suggestion!  
If only others had thought of that sooner!  
Recommend a $1030 replacement lens for a $100 kit lens!  You&#039;re right, that&#039;s definitely the way to go for someone on a budget with a Rebel 1000D!  
Are you Turbo Tax Tim by any chance???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant Suggestion!<br />
If only others had thought of that sooner!<br />
Recommend a $1030 replacement lens for a $100 kit lens!  You&#8217;re right, that&#8217;s definitely the way to go for someone on a budget with a Rebel 1000D!<br />
Are you Turbo Tax Tim by any chance???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/new-kit-lens-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-6570</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1576#comment-6570</guid>
		<description>because that adds engineering complexity and build cost.  the 18-55 is a budget lens. Adding a non rotating front element would raise the cost and thus defeat the purpose of &quot;budget&quot;.

If you want an 18-55 ef-s in non-rotating front element, they make the 17-55 2.8 IS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>because that adds engineering complexity and build cost.  the 18-55 is a budget lens. Adding a non rotating front element would raise the cost and thus defeat the purpose of &#8220;budget&#8221;.</p>
<p>If you want an 18-55 ef-s in non-rotating front element, they make the 17-55 2.8 IS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barrosinc</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/new-kit-lens-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-6567</link>
		<dc:creator>barrosinc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1576#comment-6567</guid>
		<description>&quot;IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢D LOVE to see a 24-85 2.8 or a 20-75 2.8 or a 24-70 2.0 - something to add usability and letting me carry less lensesÃ¢â‚¬Â¦&quot;


I am waiting on whater canon will come up with next... i need them to be a bit wider as i am not using them on a full frame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢D LOVE to see a 24-85 2.8 or a 20-75 2.8 or a 24-70 2.0 &#8211; something to add usability and letting me carry less lensesÃ¢â‚¬Â¦&#8221;</p>
<p>I am waiting on whater canon will come up with next&#8230; i need them to be a bit wider as i am not using them on a full frame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jouster</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/new-kit-lens-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-6565</link>
		<dc:creator>jouster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1576#comment-6565</guid>
		<description>so don&#039;t read &#039;em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so don&#8217;t read &#8216;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/new-kit-lens-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-6564</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1576#comment-6564</guid>
		<description>Right!
I think there only will be a few new canon printers!
Last year Canon announced the imagePRESS C6000 in  Germany on 25th of March 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right!<br />
I think there only will be a few new canon printers!<br />
Last year Canon announced the imagePRESS C6000 in  Germany on 25th of March 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
