<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sigma Announces 3 New Lenses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/sigma-announces-lenses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/sigma-announces-lenses/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:40:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Canonflex</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/sigma-announces-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-5988</link>
		<dc:creator>Canonflex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1460#comment-5988</guid>
		<description>I really DON&#039;T get it.

The focusing rings are all going in the Canon direction, but...

The zoom rings all go the wrong way compared to Canon OEM lenses. Would it really be that much more expensive to make them both work the &quot;right&quot; way for each mount?

The same for Tamron, Tokina, Cosina and all the rest...  :-(((((</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really DON&#8217;T get it.</p>
<p>The focusing rings are all going in the Canon direction, but&#8230;</p>
<p>The zoom rings all go the wrong way compared to Canon OEM lenses. Would it really be that much more expensive to make them both work the &#8220;right&#8221; way for each mount?</p>
<p>The same for Tamron, Tokina, Cosina and all the rest&#8230;  :-(((((</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/sigma-announces-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-5752</link>
		<dc:creator>David Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1460#comment-5752</guid>
		<description>Sigma 18-50mm OS? Depending on price, this could turn out to be a viable alternative to the kit lens. Although with it being f2.8 to 4.5 (as compared to f3.5 - 5.6 on most kit lenses) I doubt it&#039;ll be less than three times the price...

A real shame for us budget-conscious consumers who also like to use circular polarizing filters :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigma 18-50mm OS? Depending on price, this could turn out to be a viable alternative to the kit lens. Although with it being f2.8 to 4.5 (as compared to f3.5 &#8211; 5.6 on most kit lenses) I doubt it&#8217;ll be less than three times the price&#8230;</p>
<p>A real shame for us budget-conscious consumers who also like to use circular polarizing filters :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stark-Arts</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/sigma-announces-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-5724</link>
		<dc:creator>Stark-Arts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1460#comment-5724</guid>
		<description>i think this is silly unless it is very inexpensive - 200 or less. 
They would have been better to have updated the 17 - 70 2.8-4.5 with HSM and OS and tried to get it in around 300.

if it was going to be something new - a 15 - 60 2.8 would have been cool for the crop sensor folks...

As for the 24-70 i&#039;m hearing some good buzz but it is too expensive to get canon folks to switch and the nikon is just one of the great zooms ever...they needed to do something like make it either wider or longer or add IS to really make it stand out...

Someone above asked for a 200-500 5.6 - they make a 150-500 already...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think this is silly unless it is very inexpensive &#8211; 200 or less.<br />
They would have been better to have updated the 17 &#8211; 70 2.8-4.5 with HSM and OS and tried to get it in around 300.</p>
<p>if it was going to be something new &#8211; a 15 &#8211; 60 2.8 would have been cool for the crop sensor folks&#8230;</p>
<p>As for the 24-70 i&#8217;m hearing some good buzz but it is too expensive to get canon folks to switch and the nikon is just one of the great zooms ever&#8230;they needed to do something like make it either wider or longer or add IS to really make it stand out&#8230;</p>
<p>Someone above asked for a 200-500 5.6 &#8211; they make a 150-500 already&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikkorian</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/sigma-announces-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-5694</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikkorian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1460#comment-5694</guid>
		<description>Same here!! Though I believe it does have HSM already? At least for Nikon. But yes, OS would be nice, plus maybe having it start at 16 :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same here!! Though I believe it does have HSM already? At least for Nikon. But yes, OS would be nice, plus maybe having it start at 16 :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/sigma-announces-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-5681</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1460#comment-5681</guid>
		<description>yeah, but 15-84 would be a sweet range...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, but 15-84 would be a sweet range&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gusto</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/sigma-announces-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-5678</link>
		<dc:creator>Gusto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1460#comment-5678</guid>
		<description>I find all the whining very ironical. Just couple of years ago, when Canon was in the only dude in town with multiple IS lenses, many folks were mocking the need for IS. Now, there is a sudden explosion of cries for more stabilized lenses, even on those relatively wide angled ones. Ha, ha...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find all the whining very ironical. Just couple of years ago, when Canon was in the only dude in town with multiple IS lenses, many folks were mocking the need for IS. Now, there is a sudden explosion of cries for more stabilized lenses, even on those relatively wide angled ones. Ha, ha&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/sigma-announces-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-5672</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1460#comment-5672</guid>
		<description>Yet again nothing for people with full frame Cameras, all we get is endless DC, DC, DC. Why did Sigma not include OS in there new 24-70 2.8?????? Why did they even bother replacing it at all???????????? Oh yeah its now twice the price and what xtra do you get fot that???? HSM,  Waow!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet again nothing for people with full frame Cameras, all we get is endless DC, DC, DC. Why did Sigma not include OS in there new 24-70 2.8?????? Why did they even bother replacing it at all???????????? Oh yeah its now twice the price and what xtra do you get fot that???? HSM,  Waow!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: afrank99</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/sigma-announces-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-5666</link>
		<dc:creator>afrank99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 08:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1460#comment-5666</guid>
		<description>@peter: The 10-20 will obviously work on APS-C bodies. As does the 12-24.
And then there&#039;s the 17-70.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@peter: The 10-20 will obviously work on APS-C bodies. As does the 12-24.<br />
And then there&#8217;s the 17-70.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: afrank99</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/sigma-announces-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-5665</link>
		<dc:creator>afrank99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 08:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1460#comment-5665</guid>
		<description>Sigma 18-50 f/2.8-4.5 DC OS HSM? WTF?

Sigma should have updated the 18-50 f/2.8 EX with OS and HSM - that would be a really nice lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigma 18-50 f/2.8-4.5 DC OS HSM? WTF?</p>
<p>Sigma should have updated the 18-50 f/2.8 EX with OS and HSM &#8211; that would be a really nice lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ludovic</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/sigma-announces-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-5662</link>
		<dc:creator>ludovic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 07:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1460#comment-5662</guid>
		<description>when?
price?
more
thx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when?<br />
price?<br />
more<br />
thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/sigma-announces-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-5658</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 05:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1460#comment-5658</guid>
		<description>I hoped Sigma would release something starting at 15mm for APS-C :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hoped Sigma would release something starting at 15mm for APS-C :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxs</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/sigma-announces-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-5652</link>
		<dc:creator>maxs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 05:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1460#comment-5652</guid>
		<description>yawn... when is someone going to produce a 600/5.6 IS or a 200-500/5.6 IS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yawn&#8230; when is someone going to produce a 600/5.6 IS or a 200-500/5.6 IS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The new kid on the block - Sigma 10-20 f/3.5 EX DC HSM &#171; Viewing the World through Glass</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/sigma-announces-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-5650</link>
		<dc:creator>The new kid on the block - Sigma 10-20 f/3.5 EX DC HSM &#171; Viewing the World through Glass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1460#comment-5650</guid>
		<description>[...] 3, 2009 in Uncategorized    Interesting news! Sigma has just announced three new lenses which it will be adding to its product line-up which will cover 3 common ranges often used by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 3, 2009 in Uncategorized    Interesting news! Sigma has just announced three new lenses which it will be adding to its product line-up which will cover 3 common ranges often used by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrÃƒÂ©s</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/sigma-announces-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-5649</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrÃƒÂ©s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1460#comment-5649</guid>
		<description>Prices?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prices?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
