<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speedlite 220EX II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/speedlite-220ex-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/speedlite-220ex-ii/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:25:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/speedlite-220ex-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-6461</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1558#comment-6461</guid>
		<description>you are correct about the D3&#039;s vastly superior sensor technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are correct about the D3&#8217;s vastly superior sensor technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/speedlite-220ex-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-6460</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1558#comment-6460</guid>
		<description>Actually the Nikon D# cameras have a 3 year life span.  the D3 came out in August 07, so the D4 won&#039;t be out until around the middle of 2010</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the Nikon D# cameras have a 3 year life span.  the D3 came out in August 07, so the D4 won&#8217;t be out until around the middle of 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomas</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/speedlite-220ex-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-6458</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1558#comment-6458</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to see as many people switching as possible. I can already see buying all the L lenses of you for a fraction of their cost! I already got 24-70L of one such wise man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see as many people switching as possible. I can already see buying all the L lenses of you for a fraction of their cost! I already got 24-70L of one such wise man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/speedlite-220ex-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-6457</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1558#comment-6457</guid>
		<description>ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s from a technology point of view Johnny boy. D3 is better than a 1D MK3 and 1Ds MK3 period. I&#039;ve been waiting for a 1D MK3 replacement since its been aging. The 5D MK2 is a very good camera but I need an all in one with low noise high ISO and good frame rate. 12 megapixels are good enough for now. Hence, the D3. And the D4 will be out the end of this year. I&#039;ve been shooting canon since the 20D and have been a happy customer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s from a technology point of view Johnny boy. D3 is better than a 1D MK3 and 1Ds MK3 period. I&#8217;ve been waiting for a 1D MK3 replacement since its been aging. The 5D MK2 is a very good camera but I need an all in one with low noise high ISO and good frame rate. 12 megapixels are good enough for now. Hence, the D3. And the D4 will be out the end of this year. I&#8217;ve been shooting canon since the 20D and have been a happy customer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/speedlite-220ex-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-6448</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1558#comment-6448</guid>
		<description>Can we expect the same reliability degradation as with 580EX and 580EX-II?
:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we expect the same reliability degradation as with 580EX and 580EX-II?<br />
:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spam</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/speedlite-220ex-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-6447</link>
		<dc:creator>Spam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1558#comment-6447</guid>
		<description>Interesting reading. 27 replies (so far) about a rumour with so low credibility that it didn&#039;t even get a credibility rating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting reading. 27 replies (so far) about a rumour with so low credibility that it didn&#8217;t even get a credibility rating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnG</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/speedlite-220ex-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-6442</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1558#comment-6442</guid>
		<description>Do it..so we have less whining people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do it..so we have less whining people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomh</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/speedlite-220ex-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-6441</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1558#comment-6441</guid>
		<description>Point - if it can be a wireless slave it might be interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point &#8211; if it can be a wireless slave it might be interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stark-Arts</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/speedlite-220ex-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-6439</link>
		<dc:creator>Stark-Arts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1558#comment-6439</guid>
		<description>you think it took them that long to do it or do you think that the person buying a compact has no idea what a histogram is?

when canon drops doo doo in our laps I&#039;m more than happy to say it and there are several things they&#039;ve done lately that have irritated the crap out of me but the things that are mentioned above wouldn&#039;t make a top 40 hits of what canon has done to bother me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you think it took them that long to do it or do you think that the person buying a compact has no idea what a histogram is?</p>
<p>when canon drops doo doo in our laps I&#8217;m more than happy to say it and there are several things they&#8217;ve done lately that have irritated the crap out of me but the things that are mentioned above wouldn&#8217;t make a top 40 hits of what canon has done to bother me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/speedlite-220ex-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-6438</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1558#comment-6438</guid>
		<description>Do you recommend doing things in that order?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you recommend doing things in that order?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gusto</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/speedlite-220ex-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-6434</link>
		<dc:creator>Gusto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1558#comment-6434</guid>
		<description>Took Canon several years before they knew how to include live histogram in their compact cameras. Pretty pathetic, I must say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Took Canon several years before they knew how to include live histogram in their compact cameras. Pretty pathetic, I must say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gusto</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/speedlite-220ex-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-6433</link>
		<dc:creator>Gusto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1558#comment-6433</guid>
		<description>Agreed. A 220 with a swivelling head is perfect for compact cameras like the G10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. A 220 with a swivelling head is perfect for compact cameras like the G10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/speedlite-220ex-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-6432</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1558#comment-6432</guid>
		<description>Where was your head at? &quot;Investor relations&quot; is the first thing your find on www.canon.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where was your head at? &#8220;Investor relations&#8221; is the first thing your find on <a href="http://www.canon.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.canon.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/speedlite-220ex-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-6429</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1558#comment-6429</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t be switching.... but I won&#039;t be buying a new lens until the 24-70 gets IS on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t be switching&#8230;. but I won&#8217;t be buying a new lens until the 24-70 gets IS on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
