Comments on: 1D Mark IV http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/1d-mark-iv-2/ You gotta know Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:59:42 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Anonymous http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/1d-mark-iv-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9231 Anonymous Mon, 04 May 2009 20:24:22 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1786#comment-9231 You have to be by far the most arrogant person I've come across in a very long time. Both comments you made on this page clearly demonstrate how out of touch and narrow minded you are. You don't make history, you take pictures of people who make history. So don't get a big head over nothing. Your just a messenger here. You are about a dime a dozen. It's not the camera that makes the photographer but the photographer that takes the pictures that makes the camera. So, enjoy your 1Ds or 1D or whatever camera you have and I'll be sure to enjoy my 400d. You have to be by far the most arrogant person I’ve come across in a very long time. Both comments you made on this page clearly demonstrate how out of touch and narrow minded you are.
You don’t make history, you take pictures of people who make history. So don’t get a big head over nothing. Your just a messenger here. You are about a dime a dozen.
It’s not the camera that makes the photographer but the photographer that takes the pictures that makes the camera.
So, enjoy your 1Ds or 1D or whatever camera you have and I’ll be sure to enjoy my 400d.

]]> By: Rob http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/1d-mark-iv-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9047 Rob Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:59:00 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1786#comment-9047 If it had a Full Frame sensor with a 1.3 crop funtion and maybe a 1.6 crop funtion as well, that would be so handy. Best of both worlds!! If it had a Full Frame sensor with a 1.3 crop funtion and maybe a 1.6 crop funtion as well, that would be so handy. Best of both worlds!!

]]> By: BJNY http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/1d-mark-iv-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9029 BJNY Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:34:39 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1786#comment-9029 I hope sensor is non-bayer / Foveon-like. I hope sensor is non-bayer / Foveon-like.

]]> By: Gusto http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/1d-mark-iv-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9022 Gusto Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:32:24 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1786#comment-9022 According to Paul Pope (the most reliable source in DPReview), it will have a new AF sensor design and imaging sensor. Ok, ok... that's totally expected. According to Paul Pope (the most reliable source in DPReview), it will have a new AF sensor design and imaging sensor. Ok, ok… that’s totally expected.

]]> By: Zac http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/1d-mark-iv-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9007 Zac Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:18:41 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1786#comment-9007 Nicely said David and J-man. regarding specs: I'm hoping for a pellicle mirror AF system to allow increased framerate. I think some of your specs are a little unrealistic, like built in gps and bluetooth, WiFi I could see happenning though. Do you really want a touch screen though? The menu layout is so fast as it is, I just see a touch screen as a hazard. OLED would be nice, but might be next gen instead of this one... Nicely said David and J-man.

regarding specs:

I’m hoping for a pellicle mirror AF system to allow increased framerate.

I think some of your specs are a little unrealistic, like built in gps and bluetooth, WiFi I could see happenning though.

Do you really want a touch screen though? The menu layout is so fast as it is, I just see a touch screen as a hazard. OLED would be nice, but might be next gen instead of this one…

]]> By: David http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/1d-mark-iv-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9005 David Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:08:54 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1786#comment-9005 Dunno. I hope so. But companies have to cut back somewhere if they're posting losses. What I heard was about new Canon prosumer video cameras being delayed, and NAB seems to have confirmed it given they did not annouce them there even though Panasonic and JVC are leaping ahead of them in that department. Dunno. I hope so. But companies have to cut back somewhere if they’re posting losses. What I heard was about new Canon prosumer video cameras being delayed, and NAB seems to have confirmed it given they did not annouce them there even though Panasonic and JVC are leaping ahead of them in that department.

]]> By: J-Man http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/1d-mark-iv-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9002 J-Man Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:59:10 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1786#comment-9002 What about the 2010 Olympics? they'd have to be in pro hands early enough to fix any issues via firmware What about the 2010 Olympics?
they’d have to be in pro hands early enough to fix any issues via firmware

]]> By: David http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/1d-mark-iv-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9001 David Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:57:55 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1786#comment-9001 No, I mean sprout a new lens on the body via firmware or change your f 4.0 into a 2.8 sarcasm re: all the whining about added features that "should" be done via firmware updates No, I mean sprout a new lens on the body via firmware or change your f 4.0 into a 2.8

sarcasm re: all the whining about added features that “should” be done via firmware updates

]]> By: David http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/1d-mark-iv-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9000 David Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:54:02 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1786#comment-9000 Absolutely a pro can nail a shot with an entry level body. The issue is more about toughness. When you're getting paid you can't afford your equipment to break on you during a shoot. Absolutely a pro can nail a shot with an entry level body. The issue is more about toughness. When you’re getting paid you can’t afford your equipment to break on you during a shoot.

]]> By: J-Man http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/1d-mark-iv-2/comment-page-1/#comment-8998 J-Man Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:48:01 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1786#comment-8998 do you mean updating lens firmware through the body like Oly does with their Zuko lens? do you mean updating lens firmware
through the body like Oly does with their Zuko lens?

]]>