<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2000D in May?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000d-in-may/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000d-in-may/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:49:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000d-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-7427</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 04:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1664#comment-7427</guid>
		<description>I completely agree, the 9 point AF sensor on the 450D has some serious issues.  That is the main reason I went with the 1000D and have no issues what so ever with the AF, I love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree, the 9 point AF sensor on the 450D has some serious issues.  That is the main reason I went with the 1000D and have no issues what so ever with the AF, I love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000d-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-7426</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 04:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1664#comment-7426</guid>
		<description>I love my 1000D (rebel XS) but I wish it had spot metering and a higher resolution LCD.  Other then that it is perfect for me.

Things that could change but does not really affect me much are better viewfinder and AF (though the AF on the 450D is very messed up, the tried and true 7-point AF seems to work better on the 1000D).

I do not need video on a DSLR and do not want to pay more for it so unless they add it as a freebe feature I think they should keep the xxxxD series video free and stick to the basics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love my 1000D (rebel XS) but I wish it had spot metering and a higher resolution LCD.  Other then that it is perfect for me.</p>
<p>Things that could change but does not really affect me much are better viewfinder and AF (though the AF on the 450D is very messed up, the tried and true 7-point AF seems to work better on the 1000D).</p>
<p>I do not need video on a DSLR and do not want to pay more for it so unless they add it as a freebe feature I think they should keep the xxxxD series video free and stick to the basics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000d-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-7423</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 02:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1664#comment-7423</guid>
		<description>So sleepy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So sleepy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000d-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-7387</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1664#comment-7387</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually being serious.  I just found the 7 point AF to be more effective at horizontal tracking and the center is just as good, and vertical tracking is really no worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually being serious.  I just found the 7 point AF to be more effective at horizontal tracking and the center is just as good, and vertical tracking is really no worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomh</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000d-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-7381</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1664#comment-7381</guid>
		<description>Errr are you serious or is this an April fool&#039;s joke?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Errr are you serious or is this an April fool&#8217;s joke?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000d-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-7375</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1664#comment-7375</guid>
		<description>am I the only one who honestly prefers the 7 point AF system to the 9 point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>am I the only one who honestly prefers the 7 point AF system to the 9 point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000d-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-7374</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1664#comment-7374</guid>
		<description>Hey, take a look at this: Canon sent a &#039;take down&#039; notice to a blogger who speculated (apparently correctly) about a larger-sensored compact from the company:

http://www.nicephotomag.com/the-latest/canon-issues-gag-order-to-nice-photo-mag</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, take a look at this: Canon sent a &#8216;take down&#8217; notice to a blogger who speculated (apparently correctly) about a larger-sensored compact from the company:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nicephotomag.com/the-latest/canon-issues-gag-order-to-nice-photo-mag" rel="nofollow">http://www.nicephotomag.com/the-latest/canon-issues-gag-order-to-nice-photo-mag</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pawel</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000d-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-7373</link>
		<dc:creator>Pawel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1664#comment-7373</guid>
		<description>If that&#039;s not a 1 april joke: yes: they can improve 1000D: they can give him better AF (for example from 400D) ;) Even if they don&#039;t put video option and 15mp sensor it would sell great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that&#8217;s not a 1 april joke: yes: they can improve 1000D: they can give him better AF (for example from 400D) ;) Even if they don&#8217;t put video option and 15mp sensor it would sell great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000d-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-7369</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1664#comment-7369</guid>
		<description>without adding video...

what else could they possibly do that doesn&#039;t simply turn the camera into a 450D?

A 1000D with their new chip to add face detection?

I&#039;m betting on the 1000D remaining another year. IMO would be much smarter to upgrade the current kit lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>without adding video&#8230;</p>
<p>what else could they possibly do that doesn&#8217;t simply turn the camera into a 450D?</p>
<p>A 1000D with their new chip to add face detection?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m betting on the 1000D remaining another year. IMO would be much smarter to upgrade the current kit lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
