<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2000D/T1 Spec Update [CR1]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000dt1-spec-update-cr1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000dt1-spec-update-cr1/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:05:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000dt1-spec-update-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-38884</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1770#comment-38884</guid>
		<description>Hey I just wanted to let you know, I actually like the composition on your web site. But I am using Chromium on a machine running version 9.10 of Xubuntu and the design aren&#039;t quite satisfying. Not a serious deal, I can still essentially read the articles and look for for information, but just wanted to inform you about that. The navigation bar is kind of difficult to use with the config I&#039;m running. Keep up the superb work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I just wanted to let you know, I actually like the composition on your web site. But I am using Chromium on a machine running version 9.10 of Xubuntu and the design aren&#8217;t quite satisfying. Not a serious deal, I can still essentially read the articles and look for for information, but just wanted to inform you about that. The navigation bar is kind of difficult to use with the config I&#8217;m running. Keep up the superb work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yamane</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000dt1-spec-update-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-37277</link>
		<dc:creator>Yamane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1770#comment-37277</guid>
		<description>Found your site through google search. I have enjoyed reading your posts. Looking forward to more. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found your site through google search. I have enjoyed reading your posts. Looking forward to more. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy acai berry</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000dt1-spec-update-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-10110</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy acai berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 17:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1770#comment-10110</guid>
		<description>Your blog is very interresting for me, i will come back here..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your blog is very interresting for me, i will come back here..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy creatine</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000dt1-spec-update-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-9987</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy creatine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 22:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1770#comment-9987</guid>
		<description>Interesting article, i will come back to your blog soon, best regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article, i will come back to your blog soon, best regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony M</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000dt1-spec-update-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-9968</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 23:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1770#comment-9968</guid>
		<description>Bah when is there going to be more info on the 2000D? Either it shows up soon or I&#039;m pulling the trigger on the T1i.

Something like 12-15mp and 720p only @ $799 would be amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah when is there going to be more info on the 2000D? Either it shows up soon or I&#8217;m pulling the trigger on the T1i.</p>
<p>Something like 12-15mp and 720p only @ $799 would be amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SG</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000dt1-spec-update-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-9209</link>
		<dc:creator>SG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 08:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1770#comment-9209</guid>
		<description>Remember, they don&#039;t need to outsell their other models, they need to outsell their competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember, they don&#8217;t need to outsell their other models, they need to outsell their competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Kenny</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000dt1-spec-update-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-8992</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1770#comment-8992</guid>
		<description>I really hope they keep the megapixels at 12. 12 seems like the best compromise for detail/high ISO. 720P video would be fine for me (still better than what my point &amp; shoot can do), I just want video there as an additional &quot;in case I want it&quot; feature, not as a dedicated hardcore feature, especially considering sound is going to suck with just a built in mono mic (like the 500D) and no audio input if it IS going to be present. If not, I&#039;ll be waiting another camera generation. I don&#039;t know if I&#039;m going to want to upgrade if they&#039;re gonna up the 500D replacement to 17mp though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope they keep the megapixels at 12. 12 seems like the best compromise for detail/high ISO. 720P video would be fine for me (still better than what my point &amp; shoot can do), I just want video there as an additional &#8220;in case I want it&#8221; feature, not as a dedicated hardcore feature, especially considering sound is going to suck with just a built in mono mic (like the 500D) and no audio input if it IS going to be present. If not, I&#8217;ll be waiting another camera generation. I don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;m going to want to upgrade if they&#8217;re gonna up the 500D replacement to 17mp though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000dt1-spec-update-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-8807</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1770#comment-8807</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a different thought. I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve seen this rumor here. What if the T1i is the new entry model and the rumored T1 is actually a T5 or T2 or something to that effect. In this way Canon could throw in all the specs of the T1i, maybe improve the burst a bit and provide the articulating screen that they should have known about a year ago coming out of the Nikon camp? Hell they could even do 1080p at 24fps and top Nikon!

Do it. Do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a different thought. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve seen this rumor here. What if the T1i is the new entry model and the rumored T1 is actually a T5 or T2 or something to that effect. In this way Canon could throw in all the specs of the T1i, maybe improve the burst a bit and provide the articulating screen that they should have known about a year ago coming out of the Nikon camp? Hell they could even do 1080p at 24fps and top Nikon!</p>
<p>Do it. Do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flyb0y</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000dt1-spec-update-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-8755</link>
		<dc:creator>flyb0y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1770#comment-8755</guid>
		<description>Justin&#039;s right. No way this will have an articulating screen if it&#039;s coming out soon, otherwise it would have been included on the T1i.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin&#8217;s right. No way this will have an articulating screen if it&#8217;s coming out soon, otherwise it would have been included on the T1i.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000dt1-spec-update-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-8728</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 17:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1770#comment-8728</guid>
		<description>This is just dumb, they should keep the xxxxD line barebone low cost DSLR.  They should add spot metering, increase the burst rate, maybe 3 inch screen, up the megapixel to 12 (I don&#039;t care but it is a marketing thing).  That is all it needs.  I do no want to pay more for video in a bare bone DSLR.

The most suspicious spec is the 15.1mp sensor.  I doubt they would use the same resolution sensor in the xxxxD as the xxxD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just dumb, they should keep the xxxxD line barebone low cost DSLR.  They should add spot metering, increase the burst rate, maybe 3 inch screen, up the megapixel to 12 (I don&#8217;t care but it is a marketing thing).  That is all it needs.  I do no want to pay more for video in a bare bone DSLR.</p>
<p>The most suspicious spec is the 15.1mp sensor.  I doubt they would use the same resolution sensor in the xxxxD as the xxxD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnG</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000dt1-spec-update-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-8726</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 17:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1770#comment-8726</guid>
		<description>Useless ?.. Do you have one ?.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Useless ?.. Do you have one ?.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michal</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000dt1-spec-update-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-8714</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1770#comment-8714</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t care about its specs, I just hope they will lose the &quot;Rebel&quot;/&quot;Kiss&quot; badge and go with one, uniform naming convention around the world.  Actually, they should call it 5000D so we would have 5D, 50D, 500D and 5000D at available at the same time, something that would not confuse your average clueless newbie.  To much to ask, Canon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t care about its specs, I just hope they will lose the &#8220;Rebel&#8221;/&#8221;Kiss&#8221; badge and go with one, uniform naming convention around the world.  Actually, they should call it 5000D so we would have 5D, 50D, 500D and 5000D at available at the same time, something that would not confuse your average clueless newbie.  To much to ask, Canon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Musouka</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000dt1-spec-update-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-8709</link>
		<dc:creator>Musouka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 07:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1770#comment-8709</guid>
		<description>Well, Canon have mostly become a wait-and-see-what-the-competition-is-doing-then-imitate-them/improve-on-their-ideas sort of company lately.

Decidedly, they (and all other companies) have many prototypes of the same camera and they end up releasing a given model based on what the competitors are doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Canon have mostly become a wait-and-see-what-the-competition-is-doing-then-imitate-them/improve-on-their-ideas sort of company lately.</p>
<p>Decidedly, they (and all other companies) have many prototypes of the same camera and they end up releasing a given model based on what the competitors are doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/2000dt1-spec-update-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-8699</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 05:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1770#comment-8699</guid>
		<description>*its</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*its</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
