<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 50D, 450D &amp; 1000D Firmware Updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/50d-450d-1000d-firmware-updates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/50d-450d-1000d-firmware-updates/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:59:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: user12</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/50d-450d-1000d-firmware-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-9997</link>
		<dc:creator>user12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 08:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1751#comment-9997</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a newbie 1000D user and don&#039;t have experience with Canon DSLRs but is it a common practice to skip firmware versions? My 1000D has 1.0.3, the latest is 1.0.5 but I cannont find 1.0.4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a newbie 1000D user and don&#8217;t have experience with Canon DSLRs but is it a common practice to skip firmware versions? My 1000D has 1.0.3, the latest is 1.0.5 but I cannont find 1.0.4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/50d-450d-1000d-firmware-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-8593</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1751#comment-8593</guid>
		<description>Would be my definition of &quot;good service&quot;... it shouldn&#039;t  be that difficult to copy some source code of the 450D&#039;s firmware to the 400D&#039;s... but... yeah, sure - Canon has to sell new Rebels, I forgot...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would be my definition of &#8220;good service&#8221;&#8230; it shouldn&#8217;t  be that difficult to copy some source code of the 450D&#8217;s firmware to the 400D&#8217;s&#8230; but&#8230; yeah, sure &#8211; Canon has to sell new Rebels, I forgot&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/50d-450d-1000d-firmware-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-8573</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1751#comment-8573</guid>
		<description>Are you sure?  The newest firmware for the 5D Mk II is dated January &#039;09, yet I&#039;ve seen posts (and pics) in the ISO 100-200 range with the latest firmware that still clearly exhibit banding.

I really thought we&#039;d see a 5D Mk II firmware update this week.  Unless, however, Canon is waiting a couple days to let the current firmware releases drift off the front page and then make some real news on the 5D Mk II front with manual video control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure?  The newest firmware for the 5D Mk II is dated January &#8216;09, yet I&#8217;ve seen posts (and pics) in the ISO 100-200 range with the latest firmware that still clearly exhibit banding.</p>
<p>I really thought we&#8217;d see a 5D Mk II firmware update this week.  Unless, however, Canon is waiting a couple days to let the current firmware releases drift off the front page and then make some real news on the 5D Mk II front with manual video control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 40D Owner</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/50d-450d-1000d-firmware-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-8572</link>
		<dc:creator>40D Owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1751#comment-8572</guid>
		<description>What about 40D Canon?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about 40D Canon?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/50d-450d-1000d-firmware-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-8552</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1751#comment-8552</guid>
		<description>For all intents &amp; purposes, the current &quot;Rebel&quot; is the 500D/T1i.  That makes the 400D/XTi a 2-generation old canera.  What&#039;s Canon&#039;s track record in firmware updates for such oldies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all intents &amp; purposes, the current &#8220;Rebel&#8221; is the 500D/T1i.  That makes the 400D/XTi a 2-generation old canera.  What&#8217;s Canon&#8217;s track record in firmware updates for such oldies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/50d-450d-1000d-firmware-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-8549</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1751#comment-8549</guid>
		<description>Your wish will come true, albeit in a different name.

The next firmware update for the 50D will be called &quot;EOS 60D&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your wish will come true, albeit in a different name.</p>
<p>The next firmware update for the 50D will be called &#8220;EOS 60D&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PieR</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/50d-450d-1000d-firmware-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-8535</link>
		<dc:creator>PieR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1751#comment-8535</guid>
		<description>Yep, on 5dmk2 vertical banding problem is already fixed.. I think :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, on 5dmk2 vertical banding problem is already fixed.. I think :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomas</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/50d-450d-1000d-firmware-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-8533</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1751#comment-8533</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, and how about EOS 1000F and 500N?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, and how about EOS 1000F and 500N?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/50d-450d-1000d-firmware-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-8523</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1751#comment-8523</guid>
		<description>What about a 400D update? Is the 400D not supposed to support the assist AF beam feature? :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about a 400D update? Is the 400D not supposed to support the assist AF beam feature? :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/50d-450d-1000d-firmware-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-8515</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1751#comment-8515</guid>
		<description>5D2 update FIXES vertical banding and black dot issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5D2 update FIXES vertical banding and black dot issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
