<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 60D Autofocus System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/60d-autofocus-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/60d-autofocus-system/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:20:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blackberry 9500 Storm and Htc Touch Hd Come With Exciting Features &#124; HTC Touch Windows Mobile Smartphone</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/60d-autofocus-system/comment-page-1/#comment-24768</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackberry 9500 Storm and Htc Touch Hd Come With Exciting Features &#124; HTC Touch Windows Mobile Smartphone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 01:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1710#comment-24768</guid>
		<description>[...] 60D Autofocus System &#124; Canon Rumors [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 60D Autofocus System | Canon Rumors [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Ritchie</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/60d-autofocus-system/comment-page-1/#comment-9282</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Ritchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 20:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1710#comment-9282</guid>
		<description>Am I missing something, the 40D does have the same auto focus as the 50D does it not?

Cheer&#039;s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I missing something, the 40D does have the same auto focus as the 50D does it not?</p>
<p>Cheer&#8217;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eos 60 D - Page 2 - EOS-Numerique</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/60d-autofocus-system/comment-page-1/#comment-8228</link>
		<dc:creator>Eos 60 D - Page 2 - EOS-Numerique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1710#comment-8228</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geruchten Canon EOS 60D &#124; fetdigitaal.nl</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/60d-autofocus-system/comment-page-1/#comment-8223</link>
		<dc:creator>Geruchten Canon EOS 60D &#124; fetdigitaal.nl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1710#comment-8223</guid>
		<description>[...] canonrumors.com krijgt de EOS 60D het zelfde autofocus systeem mee wat ook wordt gebruikt in de 1D [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] canonrumors.com krijgt de EOS 60D het zelfde autofocus systeem mee wat ook wordt gebruikt in de 1D [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MM1</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/60d-autofocus-system/comment-page-1/#comment-8133</link>
		<dc:creator>MM1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1710#comment-8133</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s simple. Because Canon wants you to buy 1D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s simple. Because Canon wants you to buy 1D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MM1</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/60d-autofocus-system/comment-page-1/#comment-8132</link>
		<dc:creator>MM1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1710#comment-8132</guid>
		<description>To me it makes a sense. As far as I know, you can choose only some of those points, but those points do get some assist from the cluster of the points around them. Imagine multiple small versions of the current 9-point AF to choose from. That&#039;s the key to accuracy! Not just one or two AF baselines guesstimating the focus in the peripheral parts of the AF area. That&#039;s the secret of the many-point AF systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me it makes a sense. As far as I know, you can choose only some of those points, but those points do get some assist from the cluster of the points around them. Imagine multiple small versions of the current 9-point AF to choose from. That&#8217;s the key to accuracy! Not just one or two AF baselines guesstimating the focus in the peripheral parts of the AF area. That&#8217;s the secret of the many-point AF systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MM1</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/60d-autofocus-system/comment-page-1/#comment-8130</link>
		<dc:creator>MM1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1710#comment-8130</guid>
		<description>Do you think Nikon &quot;crammed&quot; D3 AF into D300? I don&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think Nikon &#8220;crammed&#8221; D3 AF into D300? I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert-Ingalls</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/60d-autofocus-system/comment-page-1/#comment-8080</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert-Ingalls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1710#comment-8080</guid>
		<description>What a tard, of course, the 1DS MK III is not build for sports, like the 1D serie.. It&#039;s pretty slow like the 5D markIII and to slow car racing or something. That fool compared 1Ds MKIII and 50D ahah that&#039;s is a joke =&gt; CR0 ^^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a tard, of course, the 1DS MK III is not build for sports, like the 1D serie.. It&#8217;s pretty slow like the 5D markIII and to slow car racing or something. That fool compared 1Ds MKIII and 50D ahah that&#8217;s is a joke =&gt; CR0 ^^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photographer/Videographer</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/60d-autofocus-system/comment-page-1/#comment-7929</link>
		<dc:creator>Photographer/Videographer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1710#comment-7929</guid>
		<description>Any mention to video mode ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any mention to video mode ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stark-Arts</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/60d-autofocus-system/comment-page-1/#comment-7927</link>
		<dc:creator>Stark-Arts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1710#comment-7927</guid>
		<description>having used both cameras in the real world I find the 6400 of both to be ok - nothing special. when you consider that $ difference between the two cameras and where they fall in the respective line ups it becomes pretty clear that Canon still has the advantage. The 1D3 is nearly a year older than the D3 (little more actually) and the ISO is still very close. The new 1D will be in the 20 range and run 2 digic 4&#039;s meaning it can easily move at 8-10 fps in raw at that resolution. 
There is always the possibility of a Digic 5 that will be even faster and cleaner as well...

The main point was that to arbitrarily say that at 21 they lose the ISO is still wrong...The 5D2 is a sub 3000 dollar camera that can shoot usable (certainly for photojournalism needs) 6400&#039;s - the new 1D will be better...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>having used both cameras in the real world I find the 6400 of both to be ok &#8211; nothing special. when you consider that $ difference between the two cameras and where they fall in the respective line ups it becomes pretty clear that Canon still has the advantage. The 1D3 is nearly a year older than the D3 (little more actually) and the ISO is still very close. The new 1D will be in the 20 range and run 2 digic 4&#8217;s meaning it can easily move at 8-10 fps in raw at that resolution.<br />
There is always the possibility of a Digic 5 that will be even faster and cleaner as well&#8230;</p>
<p>The main point was that to arbitrarily say that at 21 they lose the ISO is still wrong&#8230;The 5D2 is a sub 3000 dollar camera that can shoot usable (certainly for photojournalism needs) 6400&#8217;s &#8211; the new 1D will be better&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
