<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon PowerShot G10 Defect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/canon-powershot-g10-defect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/canon-powershot-g10-defect/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:59:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Canon Rumors Ã‚Â» Blog Archive Ã‚Â» Canon PowerShot G10 Defect &#124; 1Gadget.net</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/canon-powershot-g10-defect/comment-page-1/#comment-9449</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors Ã‚Â» Blog Archive Ã‚Â» Canon PowerShot G10 Defect &#124; 1Gadget.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 00:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1778#comment-9449</guid>
		<description>[...] more here:Ã‚Â  Canon Rumors Ã‚Â» Blog Archive Ã‚Â» Canon PowerShot G10 Defect      Easy AdSenser by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more here:Ã‚Â  Canon Rumors Ã‚Â» Blog Archive Ã‚Â» Canon PowerShot G10 Defect      Easy AdSenser by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/canon-powershot-g10-defect/comment-page-1/#comment-9424</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 09:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1778#comment-9424</guid>
		<description>whahahaha this one&#039;s funny... nice one...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whahahaha this one&#8217;s funny&#8230; nice one&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/canon-powershot-g10-defect/comment-page-1/#comment-8906</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1778#comment-8906</guid>
		<description>If you hack the G10 it turns into a PSP!!! That&#039;s how.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you hack the G10 it turns into a PSP!!! That&#8217;s how.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/canon-powershot-g10-defect/comment-page-1/#comment-8896</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1778#comment-8896</guid>
		<description>I was born sarcastic. lol

Personally I think given the huge Canon product line and new cameras released each year the problems are relatively few, and they get fixed.

Changing things like the LCD on the G series was probably because at the time bigger LCD&#039;s were the rage and they probably thought they were meeting consumer demand. I think a slightly smaller but higher rez LCD like they can make today could justify bringing the swivel back, but we&#039;ll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was born sarcastic. lol</p>
<p>Personally I think given the huge Canon product line and new cameras released each year the problems are relatively few, and they get fixed.</p>
<p>Changing things like the LCD on the G series was probably because at the time bigger LCD&#8217;s were the rage and they probably thought they were meeting consumer demand. I think a slightly smaller but higher rez LCD like they can make today could justify bringing the swivel back, but we&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/canon-powershot-g10-defect/comment-page-1/#comment-8894</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1778#comment-8894</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t miss your point. I just think it lacks reasonable perspective.

We completely disagree that the Nikon D3, D90, D300, D40 etc. are point and shoot cameras, as they all had problems, all had firmware undates to fix problems, and if you search on google you will find tons of user complaints on Nikon DSLR&#039;s in various photography forums from a google search. Perspective matters. No one comapny makes perfect products. 

I&#039;ve switched pro SLR systems three times in my career, from Contaxt RTS, RTSII&#039;s with Zeis lenses of which all 3 bodies broke on a shoot in Spain, to Nikon F3&#039;s which I had a fleet of because they all broke so often, to EOS which have yet to break on me from EOS 1&#039;s to my two 1Ds3&#039;s including a couple of XXD bodies as well. Nikons are good cameras. I might buy them now if was starting fresh. But to single Canon out for problems the way you do is not a realistic or reasonable perspective. All camera companies have production problems and defects, always have, always will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t miss your point. I just think it lacks reasonable perspective.</p>
<p>We completely disagree that the Nikon D3, D90, D300, D40 etc. are point and shoot cameras, as they all had problems, all had firmware undates to fix problems, and if you search on google you will find tons of user complaints on Nikon DSLR&#8217;s in various photography forums from a google search. Perspective matters. No one comapny makes perfect products. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve switched pro SLR systems three times in my career, from Contaxt RTS, RTSII&#8217;s with Zeis lenses of which all 3 bodies broke on a shoot in Spain, to Nikon F3&#8217;s which I had a fleet of because they all broke so often, to EOS which have yet to break on me from EOS 1&#8217;s to my two 1Ds3&#8217;s including a couple of XXD bodies as well. Nikons are good cameras. I might buy them now if was starting fresh. But to single Canon out for problems the way you do is not a realistic or reasonable perspective. All camera companies have production problems and defects, always have, always will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gusto</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/canon-powershot-g10-defect/comment-page-1/#comment-8891</link>
		<dc:creator>Gusto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1778#comment-8891</guid>
		<description>Because Canon does not make CCD sensors, only CMOS sensors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because Canon does not make CCD sensors, only CMOS sensors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flyb0y</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/canon-powershot-g10-defect/comment-page-1/#comment-8874</link>
		<dc:creator>flyb0y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1778#comment-8874</guid>
		<description>David,you again miss the point. Canon is having an increasing number of QC issues as of late. That&#039;s bad. The relevant point is that the rate of occurrence of these issues is increasing, NOT HOW THEY COMPARE TO THOSE OF OTHER BRANDS. It&#039;s comical because it is obvious that you are exclusively a Canon user, yet you are concerned with issues a couple of Nikon point-and-shoot cameras have. Who cares? Mass production will always lead to some flawed devices. These flaws are expected and marginally acceptable when they occur in lower-end, bargain-priced cameras. What bothers me is when flaws occur in high-end and professional products. The $500 G10 is NOT a bargain camera. The The 1D series are NOT bargain cameras. Yet there have been issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,you again miss the point. Canon is having an increasing number of QC issues as of late. That&#8217;s bad. The relevant point is that the rate of occurrence of these issues is increasing, NOT HOW THEY COMPARE TO THOSE OF OTHER BRANDS. It&#8217;s comical because it is obvious that you are exclusively a Canon user, yet you are concerned with issues a couple of Nikon point-and-shoot cameras have. Who cares? Mass production will always lead to some flawed devices. These flaws are expected and marginally acceptable when they occur in lower-end, bargain-priced cameras. What bothers me is when flaws occur in high-end and professional products. The $500 G10 is NOT a bargain camera. The The 1D series are NOT bargain cameras. Yet there have been issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burt</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/canon-powershot-g10-defect/comment-page-1/#comment-8866</link>
		<dc:creator>burt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1778#comment-8866</guid>
		<description>how do you know canon used a sony chip in the g10?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how do you know canon used a sony chip in the g10?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gusto</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/canon-powershot-g10-defect/comment-page-1/#comment-8859</link>
		<dc:creator>Gusto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1778#comment-8859</guid>
		<description>Wait a minute...

The CCD sensor in the Canon G10 is MADE BY SONY, NOT Canon. So, if there&#039;s a problem with the sensor, blame it on Sony. Remember previous Sony sensor and battery issues? Sony strikes again! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a minute&#8230;</p>
<p>The CCD sensor in the Canon G10 is MADE BY SONY, NOT Canon. So, if there&#8217;s a problem with the sensor, blame it on Sony. Remember previous Sony sensor and battery issues? Sony strikes again! :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/canon-powershot-g10-defect/comment-page-1/#comment-8849</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1778#comment-8849</guid>
		<description>God forbid a car company come out with a recal noticed on a $45,000 product. I mean seriously, even Bentley $250,000 cars have had defects. Welcome to the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God forbid a car company come out with a recal noticed on a $45,000 product. I mean seriously, even Bentley $250,000 cars have had defects. Welcome to the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
