<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EF Lenses for Movies? [CR1]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/ef-lenses-for-movies-cr1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/ef-lenses-for-movies-cr1/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:52:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Canon Rumors » Blog Archive » EF Lenses for Movies? [CR1] &#124; Write What</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/ef-lenses-for-movies-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-16420</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors » Blog Archive » EF Lenses for Movies? [CR1] &#124; Write What</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 10:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1774#comment-16420</guid>
		<description>[...] the original: Canon Rumors » Blog Archive » EF Lenses for Movies? [CR1]     Tagged as: archives, camera, Display, g11, Job, Photography, video No Comments    Comments (0) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original: Canon Rumors » Blog Archive » EF Lenses for Movies? [CR1]     Tagged as: archives, camera, Display, g11, Job, Photography, video No Comments    Comments (0) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/ef-lenses-for-movies-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-9498</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 10:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1774#comment-9498</guid>
		<description>i ll wait one more month and then if the new firmware doesn t come out (25p and manual control) i m going to sell my 5D.
thank you canon!
anyone interested?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i ll wait one more month and then if the new firmware doesn t come out (25p and manual control) i m going to sell my 5D.<br />
thank you canon!<br />
anyone interested?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YpoCaramel</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/ef-lenses-for-movies-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-9277</link>
		<dc:creator>YpoCaramel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 17:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1774#comment-9277</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s called Photo I XD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s called Photo I XD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/ef-lenses-for-movies-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-9063</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 14:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1774#comment-9063</guid>
		<description>Yeah just stop taking pictures too. That&#039;ll learn em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah just stop taking pictures too. That&#8217;ll learn em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darg</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/ef-lenses-for-movies-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-9056</link>
		<dc:creator>Darg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 03:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1774#comment-9056</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m already using FD lenses with an adaptor and getting amazing results.  We should boycott any movie lens until we get a firmware update</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m already using FD lenses with an adaptor and getting amazing results.  We should boycott any movie lens until we get a firmware update</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/ef-lenses-for-movies-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-8898</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1774#comment-8898</guid>
		<description>Who has more dynamic range today might not be the one who does tomorrow. But hey, which is better, jello effect or jerky 20fps? lol I&#039;m sure they will get better on the next round despite the still photo-purists shouting &quot;buy a camacorder and stop messing up out cameras&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who has more dynamic range today might not be the one who does tomorrow. But hey, which is better, jello effect or jerky 20fps? lol I&#8217;m sure they will get better on the next round despite the still photo-purists shouting &#8220;buy a camacorder and stop messing up out cameras&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/ef-lenses-for-movies-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-8886</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1774#comment-8886</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t that faked on a sound stage too? everyone knows only alien technology can actually go into space, so it seems sensible....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t that faked on a sound stage too? everyone knows only alien technology can actually go into space, so it seems sensible&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burt</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/ef-lenses-for-movies-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-8870</link>
		<dc:creator>burt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1774#comment-8870</guid>
		<description>maybe firmware update coming to add electric zoom to existing defective lenses? ha i just want fstop shutter control for video so i wait</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe firmware update coming to add electric zoom to existing defective lenses? ha i just want fstop shutter control for video so i wait</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/ef-lenses-for-movies-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-8864</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1774#comment-8864</guid>
		<description>People with opinion that differ to mine really tick me off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People with opinion that differ to mine really tick me off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/ef-lenses-for-movies-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-8863</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1774#comment-8863</guid>
		<description>video lenses would be cool. I&#039;d just like to get the same image characteristics out of the lenses I already have but for video without spending more money. Being able to frame up a shot and decide to get some video of the same shot and settings would be great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>video lenses would be cool. I&#8217;d just like to get the same image characteristics out of the lenses I already have but for video without spending more money. Being able to frame up a shot and decide to get some video of the same shot and settings would be great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/ef-lenses-for-movies-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-8850</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1774#comment-8850</guid>
		<description>Exactly. There is no such thing as auto. It was all faked by NASA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. There is no such thing as auto. It was all faked by NASA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/ef-lenses-for-movies-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-8839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1774#comment-8839</guid>
		<description>???Nikon&#039;s are Sony&#039;s with a different wrapping? I think you don&#039;t quite understand the importance of the sensor: it isn&#039;t very significant. Most sensors have a somewhat similar design anyway, and the fact that NIkon often uses Sony sensors does not mean that they are bad. The D3x, for example, easily has a two stop noise and dynamic range advantage over the A900, and the D300 has far better noise than the Sony equivalent. The fact that Sony will make a 1080p camera does not mean Nikon will; as Nikon only uses their sensors and nothing else. It is quite easy to make a 1080p camera with any sensor; you just need the right components and a fast enough processor. The sensor is one of the least significant things in camera design; you need the bayer filter, anti-alias filter, an image processor, circuit board and other components, different ergonomics, etc. That a BMW might use a V8 design engine does not mean it will perform like a V8 in a Porsche.

IMO, the largest problem with Nikon is the jello effect, and then the terrible compression. 1080p is not high on my list, but it will probably be the first to be addressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>???Nikon&#8217;s are Sony&#8217;s with a different wrapping? I think you don&#8217;t quite understand the importance of the sensor: it isn&#8217;t very significant. Most sensors have a somewhat similar design anyway, and the fact that NIkon often uses Sony sensors does not mean that they are bad. The D3x, for example, easily has a two stop noise and dynamic range advantage over the A900, and the D300 has far better noise than the Sony equivalent. The fact that Sony will make a 1080p camera does not mean Nikon will; as Nikon only uses their sensors and nothing else. It is quite easy to make a 1080p camera with any sensor; you just need the right components and a fast enough processor. The sensor is one of the least significant things in camera design; you need the bayer filter, anti-alias filter, an image processor, circuit board and other components, different ergonomics, etc. That a BMW might use a V8 design engine does not mean it will perform like a V8 in a Porsche.</p>
<p>IMO, the largest problem with Nikon is the jello effect, and then the terrible compression. 1080p is not high on my list, but it will probably be the first to be addressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/ef-lenses-for-movies-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-8834</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 06:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1774#comment-8834</guid>
		<description>Ok, I&#039;ll shoot all manual, without my nice AF system for sports, or a good exposure meter, don&#039;t need that, my eyes, which process light logarithmically will surely be as useful for estimating exposures on a linear scale as a photo reactive chip with selectable reading areas that samples the light the camera is seeing through the lens.  And Digital! don&#039;t get me started on that rubbish, Provia 100F forever, my clients don&#039;t mind waiting a week and a half for processing.  And you&#039;re completely correct about video, i was never a fan of those &#039;moving pictures&#039; from the beginning, always preferred the motor drive from my speed graflex to that stuff, it was just too close to reality. of course the graflex naturally succumbed to the amazing SLR, the golden child of all visual arts, and those can be wound with the thumb much faster than the graflex could have the film holder reversed.

Yes David, a truly superb idea count me in 100%

:)~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I&#8217;ll shoot all manual, without my nice AF system for sports, or a good exposure meter, don&#8217;t need that, my eyes, which process light logarithmically will surely be as useful for estimating exposures on a linear scale as a photo reactive chip with selectable reading areas that samples the light the camera is seeing through the lens.  And Digital! don&#8217;t get me started on that rubbish, Provia 100F forever, my clients don&#8217;t mind waiting a week and a half for processing.  And you&#8217;re completely correct about video, i was never a fan of those &#8216;moving pictures&#8217; from the beginning, always preferred the motor drive from my speed graflex to that stuff, it was just too close to reality. of course the graflex naturally succumbed to the amazing SLR, the golden child of all visual arts, and those can be wound with the thumb much faster than the graflex could have the film holder reversed.</p>
<p>Yes David, a truly superb idea count me in 100%</p>
<p>:)~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/ef-lenses-for-movies-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-8827</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1774#comment-8827</guid>
		<description>Long live the Manual Camera Society!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long live the Manual Camera Society!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
