<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Real Chuck Westfall Speaks &#8211; CNET</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/the-real-chuck-westfall-speaks-cnet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/the-real-chuck-westfall-speaks-cnet/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 13:05:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ÃÂÃÂ¾ÃÂ²ÃÂ° ÃÂ¢ÃÂµÃÂ»ÃÂµÃÂ²ÃÂ¸ÃÂ·ÃÂ¸Ã‘Â</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/the-real-chuck-westfall-speaks-cnet/comment-page-1/#comment-8273</link>
		<dc:creator>ÃÂÃÂ¾ÃÂ²ÃÂ° ÃÂ¢ÃÂµÃÂ»ÃÂµÃÂ²ÃÂ¸ÃÂ·ÃÂ¸Ã‘Â</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1705#comment-8273</guid>
		<description>In video mode autofocus really work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In video mode autofocus really work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/the-real-chuck-westfall-speaks-cnet/comment-page-1/#comment-8186</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1705#comment-8186</guid>
		<description>What Canon needs to do is get there AF in check.  That&#039;s the biggest issue.  It&#039;s not just the 1dmIII it all of the body&#039;s.  I just keep reading how everyone is switching to Nikon(d700,d3,etc) and the reason for Switching is AF.  The forum I&#039;m referring to is at www.digitalweddingforum.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Canon needs to do is get there AF in check.  That&#8217;s the biggest issue.  It&#8217;s not just the 1dmIII it all of the body&#8217;s.  I just keep reading how everyone is switching to Nikon(d700,d3,etc) and the reason for Switching is AF.  The forum I&#8217;m referring to is at <a href="http://www.digitalweddingforum.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.digitalweddingforum.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dorkage</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/the-real-chuck-westfall-speaks-cnet/comment-page-1/#comment-7861</link>
		<dc:creator>dorkage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1705#comment-7861</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s saying he *looks* like a square, not that he is one. But if he looked like a model he wouldn&#039;t have time to sit around informing us :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s saying he *looks* like a square, not that he is one. But if he looked like a model he wouldn&#8217;t have time to sit around informing us :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/the-real-chuck-westfall-speaks-cnet/comment-page-1/#comment-7834</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1705#comment-7834</guid>
		<description>yes, actually, the fake juck westfall makes more sense than the real one :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, actually, the fake juck westfall makes more sense than the real one :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Chardine</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/the-real-chuck-westfall-speaks-cnet/comment-page-1/#comment-7829</link>
		<dc:creator>John Chardine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1705#comment-7829</guid>
		<description>I find the comment from Westfall about megapixels interesting and disappointing. It doesn&#039;t look like Canon is going to stop trying to jam more sensor sites onto their sensors. They should realise that this is not what users necessarily want. The last thing I need in the future is a DSLR that produces images so large I can&#039;t process them or which has sensor sites the size of point and shoot cameras.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find the comment from Westfall about megapixels interesting and disappointing. It doesn&#8217;t look like Canon is going to stop trying to jam more sensor sites onto their sensors. They should realise that this is not what users necessarily want. The last thing I need in the future is a DSLR that produces images so large I can&#8217;t process them or which has sensor sites the size of point and shoot cameras.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/the-real-chuck-westfall-speaks-cnet/comment-page-1/#comment-7813</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 23:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1705#comment-7813</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m on my soap box again, but your observation BigT about xxD cameras and super telephoto lenses is accurate b/c of the 1.6x fov crop. Who can ever get enough reach? (Rhetorical question because it&#039;s true). So, yes. Better autofocus, full weather sealing, 100% viewfinder, better white balance, low-noise, high iso, fast shutter, etc are all needed in a 1.6 or 1.3x camera. And yes, this should be able to be done for under 3K. Just like Omg said: copy everything Nikon is doing and take it further. Why the hell not? When your technology is on par with the other guys, people can focus on what is important--lenses!!! Now about those lenses Canon... http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/5DIIreview.shtml ... B+ isn&#039;t good enough gents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m on my soap box again, but your observation BigT about xxD cameras and super telephoto lenses is accurate b/c of the 1.6x fov crop. Who can ever get enough reach? (Rhetorical question because it&#8217;s true). So, yes. Better autofocus, full weather sealing, 100% viewfinder, better white balance, low-noise, high iso, fast shutter, etc are all needed in a 1.6 or 1.3x camera. And yes, this should be able to be done for under 3K. Just like Omg said: copy everything Nikon is doing and take it further. Why the hell not? When your technology is on par with the other guys, people can focus on what is important&#8211;lenses!!! Now about those lenses Canon&#8230; <a href="http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/5DIIreview.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/5DIIreview.shtml</a> &#8230; B+ isn&#8217;t good enough gents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/the-real-chuck-westfall-speaks-cnet/comment-page-1/#comment-7807</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1705#comment-7807</guid>
		<description>I guess he will be the right person to ask about canon&#039;s reasons for disabling manual controls in 5D II</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess he will be the right person to ask about canon&#8217;s reasons for disabling manual controls in 5D II</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/the-real-chuck-westfall-speaks-cnet/comment-page-1/#comment-7804</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1705#comment-7804</guid>
		<description>Score one for you!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Score one for you!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evohe80</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/the-real-chuck-westfall-speaks-cnet/comment-page-1/#comment-7803</link>
		<dc:creator>evohe80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1705#comment-7803</guid>
		<description>Agreed. Not a single news in the interview. 

Reading FakeChuck response to the interview was much more fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. Not a single news in the interview. </p>
<p>Reading FakeChuck response to the interview was much more fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F Canon</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/the-real-chuck-westfall-speaks-cnet/comment-page-1/#comment-7801</link>
		<dc:creator>F Canon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1705#comment-7801</guid>
		<description>By the way, that OLED stuff looks cool, I wish a 3&quot; OLED Screen mounted on my next canon body :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, that OLED stuff looks cool, I wish a 3&#8243; OLED Screen mounted on my next canon body :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
