<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tokina 12-24 f/4 DX Review &#8211; DPReview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/tokina-12-24-f4-dx-review-dpreview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/tokina-12-24-f4-dx-review-dpreview/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimothy</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/tokina-12-24-f4-dx-review-dpreview/comment-page-1/#comment-7796</link>
		<dc:creator>jimothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1697#comment-7796</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s also a shame they don&#039;t compare it to Canon&#039;s 10-22mm EF-S. I&#039;m very happy with that lens, and have no intention of trade it, but it&#039;d be interested to see how this new Tokina stacks up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s also a shame they don&#8217;t compare it to Canon&#8217;s 10-22mm EF-S. I&#8217;m very happy with that lens, and have no intention of trade it, but it&#8217;d be interested to see how this new Tokina stacks up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/tokina-12-24-f4-dx-review-dpreview/comment-page-1/#comment-7699</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1697#comment-7699</guid>
		<description>As noted below, photozone has a excellent review for both the 11-16/2.8 and the 12-24 /4.  You can compare them there if you wish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As noted below, photozone has a excellent review for both the 11-16/2.8 and the 12-24 /4.  You can compare them there if you wish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philippe</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/tokina-12-24-f4-dx-review-dpreview/comment-page-1/#comment-7690</link>
		<dc:creator>Philippe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 18:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1697#comment-7690</guid>
		<description>Having been an owner of the previous version of this lens, I can absolutely agree to every word of their conclusion. In addition, the lens is also a very solid construction. Highly recommended for anyone looking for an APS-C wide-angle lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having been an owner of the previous version of this lens, I can absolutely agree to every word of their conclusion. In addition, the lens is also a very solid construction. Highly recommended for anyone looking for an APS-C wide-angle lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Musouka</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/tokina-12-24-f4-dx-review-dpreview/comment-page-1/#comment-7689</link>
		<dc:creator>Musouka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1697#comment-7689</guid>
		<description>If you are interested in lens reviews, the following site has some pretty good ones:

http://www.photozone.de</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are interested in lens reviews, the following site has some pretty good ones:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.photozone.de" rel="nofollow">http://www.photozone.de</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perneta</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/tokina-12-24-f4-dx-review-dpreview/comment-page-1/#comment-7672</link>
		<dc:creator>Perneta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1697#comment-7672</guid>
		<description>It is a pity because they didnÃ‚Â´t compare this lens with the excelent Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a pity because they didnÃ‚Â´t compare this lens with the excelent Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/40 queries in 0.009 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 403/404 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 22:51:19 -->
