<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Timeline [CR1] *UPDATE*</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:26:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: getrapidsahre</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-24565</link>
		<dc:creator>getrapidsahre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 23:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-24565</guid>
		<description>Get Rapidshare Premium Account For Free (expires after 6 month from today)
Tak Your Free Rapidshare Premium Account Now 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hosting-network.net/rapidshare/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Get Free Rapidshare Account&lt;/a&gt;

Hurry ! Wy Have Limited 100 Free Accounts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get Rapidshare Premium Account For Free (expires after 6 month from today)<br />
Tak Your Free Rapidshare Premium Account Now </p>
<p><a href="http://www.hosting-network.net/rapidshare/" rel="nofollow">Get Free Rapidshare Account</a></p>
<p>Hurry ! Wy Have Limited 100 Free Accounts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-10617</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 20:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-10617</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got both the 85 and 50 I mentioned and unfortunately neither has AF that&#039;s up to shooting sports (in my case cycling road races)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got both the 85 and 50 I mentioned and unfortunately neither has AF that&#8217;s up to shooting sports (in my case cycling road races)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-10610</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 16:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-10610</guid>
		<description>they limit the white to lenses longer than 135mm, but a lot of the primes are great, fast aperture and focus, just no IS, maybe the 135mm f/2L USM update will have IS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they limit the white to lenses longer than 135mm, but a lot of the primes are great, fast aperture and focus, just no IS, maybe the 135mm f/2L USM update will have IS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-10609</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 16:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-10609</guid>
		<description>no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-10608</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 15:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-10608</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll cast a vote for a super fast prime in the 35-85mm range. Give the 50mm f1.2 or the 85mm f1.2 the AF and IS of the 200mm f2 and I can die happy.

Basically I want &quot;white&quot; to make an appearance below 100mm. Anyone else think that will ever happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll cast a vote for a super fast prime in the 35-85mm range. Give the 50mm f1.2 or the 85mm f1.2 the AF and IS of the 200mm f2 and I can die happy.</p>
<p>Basically I want &#8220;white&#8221; to make an appearance below 100mm. Anyone else think that will ever happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-10145</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 18:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-10145</guid>
		<description>I doubt it.  it&#039;s still less than 3 years old, and they&#039;re&#039;s not a lot to do to it.

power
200mm zoom
unless canon wants to start jacking some of the nikon flash niceties, included color gels and diffusion dome, etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt it.  it&#8217;s still less than 3 years old, and they&#8217;re&#8217;s not a lot to do to it.</p>
<p>power<br />
200mm zoom<br />
unless canon wants to start jacking some of the nikon flash niceties, included color gels and diffusion dome, etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-10144</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 18:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-10144</guid>
		<description>lol.

yes make it an ultra-wide to normal, and see it has decent performance or low cost.

I don&#039;t think a redone 17-40 is due for some time, but it might come out with/a little after the 35/1.4 II</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol.</p>
<p>yes make it an ultra-wide to normal, and see it has decent performance or low cost.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think a redone 17-40 is due for some time, but it might come out with/a little after the 35/1.4 II</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-10141</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 15:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-10141</guid>
		<description>does anyone know what when the 580EX III is going to come out? Its the oldest speedlite in canon&#039;s arsenal. But the most expensive. Is it by any chance the one that&#039;s going to be released this fall?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does anyone know what when the 580EX III is going to come out? Its the oldest speedlite in canon&#8217;s arsenal. But the most expensive. Is it by any chance the one that&#8217;s going to be released this fall?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-9976</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 12:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-9976</guid>
		<description>Make that a 15-40 or even better a 15-50/f4 and i&#039;ll be happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make that a 15-40 or even better a 15-50/f4 and i&#8217;ll be happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-9975</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 12:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-9975</guid>
		<description>Neither does Nikon!. Look at how long the prosumers need to wait for a AF-S 300/f4 VR or a AF-S 80-400/f4.5-5.6 VR. Nikon has replaced their top of the line 300,400 and 500 several times over a short time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neither does Nikon!. Look at how long the prosumers need to wait for a AF-S 300/f4 VR or a AF-S 80-400/f4.5-5.6 VR. Nikon has replaced their top of the line 300,400 and 500 several times over a short time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
