<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Timeline [CR1] *UPDATE*</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: du doan bong da</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-51892</link>
		<dc:creator>du doan bong da</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 04:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-51892</guid>
		<description>I doubt it. it’s still less than 3 years old, and they’re’s not a lot to do to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt it. it’s still less than 3 years old, and they’re’s not a lot to do to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: getrapidsahre</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-24565</link>
		<dc:creator>getrapidsahre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 23:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-24565</guid>
		<description>Get Rapidshare Premium Account For Free (expires after 6 month from today)
Tak Your Free Rapidshare Premium Account Now 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hosting-network.net/rapidshare/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Get Free Rapidshare Account&lt;/a&gt;

Hurry ! Wy Have Limited 100 Free Accounts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get Rapidshare Premium Account For Free (expires after 6 month from today)<br />
Tak Your Free Rapidshare Premium Account Now </p>
<p><a href="http://www.hosting-network.net/rapidshare/" rel="nofollow">Get Free Rapidshare Account</a></p>
<p>Hurry ! Wy Have Limited 100 Free Accounts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-10617</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 20:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-10617</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got both the 85 and 50 I mentioned and unfortunately neither has AF that&#039;s up to shooting sports (in my case cycling road races)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got both the 85 and 50 I mentioned and unfortunately neither has AF that&#8217;s up to shooting sports (in my case cycling road races)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-10610</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 16:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-10610</guid>
		<description>they limit the white to lenses longer than 135mm, but a lot of the primes are great, fast aperture and focus, just no IS, maybe the 135mm f/2L USM update will have IS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they limit the white to lenses longer than 135mm, but a lot of the primes are great, fast aperture and focus, just no IS, maybe the 135mm f/2L USM update will have IS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-10609</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 16:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-10609</guid>
		<description>no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-10608</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 15:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-10608</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll cast a vote for a super fast prime in the 35-85mm range. Give the 50mm f1.2 or the 85mm f1.2 the AF and IS of the 200mm f2 and I can die happy.

Basically I want &quot;white&quot; to make an appearance below 100mm. Anyone else think that will ever happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll cast a vote for a super fast prime in the 35-85mm range. Give the 50mm f1.2 or the 85mm f1.2 the AF and IS of the 200mm f2 and I can die happy.</p>
<p>Basically I want &#8220;white&#8221; to make an appearance below 100mm. Anyone else think that will ever happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-10145</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 18:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-10145</guid>
		<description>I doubt it.  it&#039;s still less than 3 years old, and they&#039;re&#039;s not a lot to do to it.

power
200mm zoom
unless canon wants to start jacking some of the nikon flash niceties, included color gels and diffusion dome, etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt it.  it&#8217;s still less than 3 years old, and they&#8217;re&#8217;s not a lot to do to it.</p>
<p>power<br />
200mm zoom<br />
unless canon wants to start jacking some of the nikon flash niceties, included color gels and diffusion dome, etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-10144</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 18:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-10144</guid>
		<description>lol.

yes make it an ultra-wide to normal, and see it has decent performance or low cost.

I don&#039;t think a redone 17-40 is due for some time, but it might come out with/a little after the 35/1.4 II</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol.</p>
<p>yes make it an ultra-wide to normal, and see it has decent performance or low cost.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think a redone 17-40 is due for some time, but it might come out with/a little after the 35/1.4 II</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-10141</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 15:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-10141</guid>
		<description>does anyone know what when the 580EX III is going to come out? Its the oldest speedlite in canon&#039;s arsenal. But the most expensive. Is it by any chance the one that&#039;s going to be released this fall?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does anyone know what when the 580EX III is going to come out? Its the oldest speedlite in canon&#8217;s arsenal. But the most expensive. Is it by any chance the one that&#8217;s going to be released this fall?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-9976</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 12:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-9976</guid>
		<description>Make that a 15-40 or even better a 15-50/f4 and i&#039;ll be happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make that a 15-40 or even better a 15-50/f4 and i&#8217;ll be happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-9975</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 12:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-9975</guid>
		<description>Neither does Nikon!. Look at how long the prosumers need to wait for a AF-S 300/f4 VR or a AF-S 80-400/f4.5-5.6 VR. Nikon has replaced their top of the line 300,400 and 500 several times over a short time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neither does Nikon!. Look at how long the prosumers need to wait for a AF-S 300/f4 VR or a AF-S 80-400/f4.5-5.6 VR. Nikon has replaced their top of the line 300,400 and 500 several times over a short time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: i2</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-9967</link>
		<dc:creator>i2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-9967</guid>
		<description>werent there news about a 17-40II?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>werent there news about a 17-40II?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed II</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-9944</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 11:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-9944</guid>
		<description>+2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigDaddyM</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/a-timeline-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-9921</link>
		<dc:creator>BigDaddyM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 20:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1846#comment-9921</guid>
		<description>I will buy the 24-70 II IS the day it is available, and I will also be getting the 1Ds4 as well.  I was wishing for Fall this year for their releases but it is what it is.  

I have the 1Ds2 and just didn&#039;t think the 1Ds3 had enough upgrades to make me purchase.  Seeing what the 5D2 received, I could guess at what the 1Ds4 would at least have and that is enough for me to consider it a done deal.
M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will buy the 24-70 II IS the day it is available, and I will also be getting the 1Ds4 as well.  I was wishing for Fall this year for their releases but it is what it is.  </p>
<p>I have the 1Ds2 and just didn&#8217;t think the 1Ds3 had enough upgrades to make me purchase.  Seeing what the 5D2 received, I could guess at what the 1Ds4 would at least have and that is enough for me to consider it a done deal.<br />
M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/49 queries in 0.020 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 538/539 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 14:34:02 -->
