<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon Pro9000 Mark II &amp; Pro9500 Mark II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/canon-pro9000-mark-ii-pro9500-mark-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/canon-pro9000-mark-ii-pro9500-mark-ii/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:39:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Canon Rumors</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/canon-pro9000-mark-ii-pro9500-mark-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-10239</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 23:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2031#comment-10239</guid>
		<description>Hey Dan

I have the Pro9500 (non mark version). They&#039;re the same print engine.

To give an idea about ink usage, I printed 15 B&amp;W 12x18 images and burned one gray tank. Black and Photo black were down.

I don&#039;t find that it eats a lot of ink.

I don&#039;t recommend the Canon fine art papers, their profiles require a 35mm border. So you can&#039;t actually print a 12x18 using their paper.

That said, Hahnemuhles profiles don&#039;t have that issue and I find their paper is the best anyway. I&#039;m sure Ilford&#039;s is grand too.

Hahnemuhle makes some if not all of Canon&#039;s fine art papers, so some Hahnemuhle profiles might work.

I chose Canon over Epson for a few reasons.

1) I&#039;m never going to print with rolls.

2) Epson&#039;s famous &quot;this product has reached the end of its serviceable life&quot; funtimes. I&#039;ve seen this on cheap printers as well as 2200&#039;s and 2400&#039;s. Just die... don&#039;t tell me you&#039;ve died... seems fishy.

3) Because I run this site and it would be wrong for me to buy an Epson!

Both will produce stunning prints in the right hands.

I&#039;ll give a +1 to Epson for their media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dan</p>
<p>I have the Pro9500 (non mark version). They&#8217;re the same print engine.</p>
<p>To give an idea about ink usage, I printed 15 B&#038;W 12&#215;18 images and burned one gray tank. Black and Photo black were down.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t find that it eats a lot of ink.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t recommend the Canon fine art papers, their profiles require a 35mm border. So you can&#8217;t actually print a 12&#215;18 using their paper.</p>
<p>That said, Hahnemuhles profiles don&#8217;t have that issue and I find their paper is the best anyway. I&#8217;m sure Ilford&#8217;s is grand too.</p>
<p>Hahnemuhle makes some if not all of Canon&#8217;s fine art papers, so some Hahnemuhle profiles might work.</p>
<p>I chose Canon over Epson for a few reasons.</p>
<p>1) I&#8217;m never going to print with rolls.</p>
<p>2) Epson&#8217;s famous &#8220;this product has reached the end of its serviceable life&#8221; funtimes. I&#8217;ve seen this on cheap printers as well as 2200&#8217;s and 2400&#8217;s. Just die&#8230; don&#8217;t tell me you&#8217;ve died&#8230; seems fishy.</p>
<p>3) Because I run this site and it would be wrong for me to buy an Epson!</p>
<p>Both will produce stunning prints in the right hands.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll give a +1 to Epson for their media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan OK</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/canon-pro9000-mark-ii-pro9500-mark-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-10232</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan OK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 22:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2031#comment-10232</guid>
		<description>I do not have a photo printer and have used online printers for my photos.  But this post has spiked my interested in a printer.  The choice is difficult.  The 9500 Mark II image quality looks great, but how long do the cartridges really last? 

I am also considering the Epson R1900 printer because it is less expensive and it can create landscapes up to 13&quot; x 44&quot;.  But...I read the ink cartridges are small get sucked dry.  

Does anyone have any practical experience with either printer?

Can someone recommend purchasing a photo printer vs using the online photo services?

Thx
Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not have a photo printer and have used online printers for my photos.  But this post has spiked my interested in a printer.  The choice is difficult.  The 9500 Mark II image quality looks great, but how long do the cartridges really last? </p>
<p>I am also considering the Epson R1900 printer because it is less expensive and it can create landscapes up to 13&#8243; x 44&#8243;.  But&#8230;I read the ink cartridges are small get sucked dry.  </p>
<p>Does anyone have any practical experience with either printer?</p>
<p>Can someone recommend purchasing a photo printer vs using the online photo services?</p>
<p>Thx<br />
Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/canon-pro9000-mark-ii-pro9500-mark-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-10230</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 21:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2031#comment-10230</guid>
		<description>It integrates flawlessly with the print button.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It integrates flawlessly with the print button.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twinkle</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/canon-pro9000-mark-ii-pro9500-mark-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-10219</link>
		<dc:creator>twinkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2031#comment-10219</guid>
		<description>How does the 9500 MK 2 compare to the 5D MK 2?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does the 9500 MK 2 compare to the 5D MK 2?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heavybarrel</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/canon-pro9000-mark-ii-pro9500-mark-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-10211</link>
		<dc:creator>Heavybarrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2031#comment-10211</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know how these compare to the Epson R1900?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know how these compare to the Epson R1900?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/canon-pro9000-mark-ii-pro9500-mark-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-10208</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 16:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2031#comment-10208</guid>
		<description>Yes, I&#039;ve was looking at them over the weekend.  There is a $200 rebate on the 9500 MK II almost everywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;ve was looking at them over the weekend.  There is a $200 rebate on the 9500 MK II almost everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
