<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Cheap Primes? [CR1]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/new-cheap-primes-cr1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/new-cheap-primes-cr1/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:40:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Caitlin</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/new-cheap-primes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-30490</link>
		<dc:creator>Caitlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2008#comment-30490</guid>
		<description>I am so much interested in photography but not a proffesional though...but my dream was to click real good pics..so after a long time research I decided to buy an slr which is really easy to use and worth the money and just right I found can rebel Xsi and I really feel it was worth every penny I spent and I love it....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so much interested in photography but not a proffesional though&#8230;but my dream was to click real good pics..so after a long time research I decided to buy an slr which is really easy to use and worth the money and just right I found can rebel Xsi and I really feel it was worth every penny I spent and I love it&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/new-cheap-primes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-11723</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2008#comment-11723</guid>
		<description>What is the obsession with normal lenses?  I almost never use a normal range focal length.  Always something wide or tele</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the obsession with normal lenses?  I almost never use a normal range focal length.  Always something wide or tele</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheng</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/new-cheap-primes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-11712</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2008#comment-11712</guid>
		<description>I love my 50 1.8 II, but on my cropped sensor, it can&#039;t be an everyday lens. I&#039;m really leaning toward a normal prime for the 1.6x cameras. If it was plastic.. that might even be better, it&#039;ll be lighter =) i&#039;ll hold out as long as i can for the 35/f2 replacement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love my 50 1.8 II, but on my cropped sensor, it can&#8217;t be an everyday lens. I&#8217;m really leaning toward a normal prime for the 1.6x cameras. If it was plastic.. that might even be better, it&#8217;ll be lighter =) i&#8217;ll hold out as long as i can for the 35/f2 replacement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/new-cheap-primes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-11691</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2008#comment-11691</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a silly question but since I am fairly new to this...Don&#039;t be too unkind!!! If you have a ef 50mm f1.2 and ef 50mm f1.4. If you set them both at f2.8 for instance would they both give the same exposure or would the 1.2 being a larger diameter lense allow more light through in the same amount of time? Secondly given the same aperture setting of f2.8 would you expect a noticable difference in the resulting image and has anyone actually tested this out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a silly question but since I am fairly new to this&#8230;Don&#8217;t be too unkind!!! If you have a ef 50mm f1.2 and ef 50mm f1.4. If you set them both at f2.8 for instance would they both give the same exposure or would the 1.2 being a larger diameter lense allow more light through in the same amount of time? Secondly given the same aperture setting of f2.8 would you expect a noticable difference in the resulting image and has anyone actually tested this out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn DeArmond</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/new-cheap-primes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-10227</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn DeArmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 21:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2008#comment-10227</guid>
		<description>How do I test it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do I test it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/new-cheap-primes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-10105</link>
		<dc:creator>gwac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2008#comment-10105</guid>
		<description>These are old and outdated lenses. The 35mm f/2 is optically OK but has an ancient AF motor with 5-bladed diaphragm, while the 28mm f/1.8 is pretty soft wide open with soft edges throughout. Both are overpriced for what they offer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are old and outdated lenses. The 35mm f/2 is optically OK but has an ancient AF motor with 5-bladed diaphragm, while the 28mm f/1.8 is pretty soft wide open with soft edges throughout. Both are overpriced for what they offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomas</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/new-cheap-primes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-10085</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2008#comment-10085</guid>
		<description>If it is good then definitely keep it. But if it front / back - focuses then return it (you know how to test it, right?). I tried a couple in a shop and they didn&#039;t work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it is good then definitely keep it. But if it front / back &#8211; focuses then return it (you know how to test it, right?). I tried a couple in a shop and they didn&#8217;t work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/new-cheap-primes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-10080</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2008#comment-10080</guid>
		<description>lol yea.  Just boughta used 1.4 off FM forums</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol yea.  Just boughta used 1.4 off FM forums</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn DeArmond</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/new-cheap-primes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-10079</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn DeArmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2008#comment-10079</guid>
		<description>Doh!  I JUST bought the Sigma 50mm 1.4 yesterday!  Hmmm... B&amp;H does have a 15-day return policy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doh!  I JUST bought the Sigma 50mm 1.4 yesterday!  Hmmm&#8230; B&amp;H does have a 15-day return policy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/new-cheap-primes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-10076</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2008#comment-10076</guid>
		<description>Agree. I would buy the 50 1.2L if I didn&#039;t hear so much about the design issues and the review sites held it in higher esteem. They don&#039;t however, and you bet I am not into $1700 of glass for lukewarm reviews. No one is going to buy unless they absolutely demand the sharpest pictures from f1.2-2.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree. I would buy the 50 1.2L if I didn&#8217;t hear so much about the design issues and the review sites held it in higher esteem. They don&#8217;t however, and you bet I am not into $1700 of glass for lukewarm reviews. No one is going to buy unless they absolutely demand the sharpest pictures from f1.2-2.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
