<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon Profit Down 64%, Sees Loss Ahead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/nikon-profit-down-64-sees-loss-ahead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/nikon-profit-down-64-sees-loss-ahead/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:20:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Atlanta Debt</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/nikon-profit-down-64-sees-loss-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-32687</link>
		<dc:creator>Atlanta Debt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1855#comment-32687</guid>
		<description>This is such an important topic, I wish more people would write about it, not just spamming other people&#039;s ideas. Researched content is hard to find on the Internet these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such an important topic, I wish more people would write about it, not just spamming other people&#8217;s ideas. Researched content is hard to find on the Internet these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chute vertigineuse des ventes Canon - Page 2 - EOS-Numerique</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/nikon-profit-down-64-sees-loss-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-9996</link>
		<dc:creator>Chute vertigineuse des ventes Canon - Page 2 - EOS-Numerique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 07:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1855#comment-9996</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/nikon-profit-down-64-sees-loss-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-9901</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 12:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1855#comment-9901</guid>
		<description>Is this true also?

https://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/UPDATE-2-Canon-Q1-profit-down-88-pct-raises-outloo-RLAT7?OpenDocument</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this true also?</p>
<p><a href="https://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/UPDATE-2-Canon-Q1-profit-down-88-pct-raises-outloo-RLAT7?OpenDocument" rel="nofollow">https://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/UPDATE-2-Canon-Q1-profit-down-88-pct-raises-outloo-RLAT7?OpenDocument</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ossme</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/nikon-profit-down-64-sees-loss-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-9875</link>
		<dc:creator>ossme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 19:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1855#comment-9875</guid>
		<description>I hope so, the last thing I want is for a great camera maker to go out of busniess..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope so, the last thing I want is for a great camera maker to go out of busniess..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilikemboth</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/nikon-profit-down-64-sees-loss-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-9873</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilikemboth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 17:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1855#comment-9873</guid>
		<description>Actually they didn&#039;t.  They have been leaning out for quite awhile to prepare for this.  Smaller than Canon, yes, but still quite a big company, they will be fine. Check out what the other side has to say: http://www.bythom.com/ .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually they didn&#8217;t.  They have been leaning out for quite awhile to prepare for this.  Smaller than Canon, yes, but still quite a big company, they will be fine. Check out what the other side has to say: <a href="http://www.bythom.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bythom.com/</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ossme</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/nikon-profit-down-64-sees-loss-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-9866</link>
		<dc:creator>ossme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 13:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1855#comment-9866</guid>
		<description>damm, they got their economic future out of focus... although they have 51 focus points...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>damm, they got their economic future out of focus&#8230; although they have 51 focus points&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/nikon-profit-down-64-sees-loss-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-9865</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 13:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1855#comment-9865</guid>
		<description>Let it die already...


joking... :) ~ I like my Canon but I like competition even more. Hopefully, both compagny will not cut too much on R&amp;D :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let it die already&#8230;</p>
<p>joking&#8230; :) ~ I like my Canon but I like competition even more. Hopefully, both compagny will not cut too much on R&amp;D :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/nikon-profit-down-64-sees-loss-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-9853</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 06:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1855#comment-9853</guid>
		<description>HA TOLD YA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HA TOLD YA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mantra</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/nikon-profit-down-64-sees-loss-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-9852</link>
		<dc:creator>mantra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 06:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1855#comment-9852</guid>
		<description>what&#039;s about canon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what&#8217;s about canon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/nikon-profit-down-64-sees-loss-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-9850</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 05:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1855#comment-9850</guid>
		<description>did Ken Rockwell die or something? :&#039;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did Ken Rockwell die or something? :&#8217;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/nikon-profit-down-64-sees-loss-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-9845</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1855#comment-9845</guid>
		<description>Its unfortunate for all Photography fans when a company like Nikon loses money.  

Typically, companies first cut customer service staff, find cheaper subcontractors, and take any shortcuts they can in production.  This inevitably results in poorer quality products.  I&#039;m not talking Nikon specifically here, it applies to all of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its unfortunate for all Photography fans when a company like Nikon loses money.  </p>
<p>Typically, companies first cut customer service staff, find cheaper subcontractors, and take any shortcuts they can in production.  This inevitably results in poorer quality products.  I&#8217;m not talking Nikon specifically here, it applies to all of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/nikon-profit-down-64-sees-loss-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-9840</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 22:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1855#comment-9840</guid>
		<description>It close at $33.16 today. On March 9th it was $21.52.  Where do you think it&#039;s headed?  Buy now or wait?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It close at $33.16 today. On March 9th it was $21.52.  Where do you think it&#8217;s headed?  Buy now or wait?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/nikon-profit-down-64-sees-loss-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-9830</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1855#comment-9830</guid>
		<description>going into the red this year? that ain&#039;t good.  As much as I hate nikon camera&#039;s control structure they do make canon give us better products at better prices, and of course their steppers are absolutely vital to the technology market in general, which is one of the big driving forces in the global economy.

buy 14-24 f/2.8G ED-IF N with F mount to EF converter?...maybe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>going into the red this year? that ain&#8217;t good.  As much as I hate nikon camera&#8217;s control structure they do make canon give us better products at better prices, and of course their steppers are absolutely vital to the technology market in general, which is one of the big driving forces in the global economy.</p>
<p>buy 14-24 f/2.8G ED-IF N with F mount to EF converter?&#8230;maybe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeCam</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/05/nikon-profit-down-64-sees-loss-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-9824</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeCam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 16:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1855#comment-9824</guid>
		<description>It would be interesting to know how the camera division did in the year. I can probably say it wasn&#039;t that bad. The loss is stated as a chip fab machine under performance not a lens or camera problem.

Canon is a much larger company but it will be hit with a wider loss since most of their products suffered from lack of new orders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to know how the camera division did in the year. I can probably say it wasn&#8217;t that bad. The loss is stated as a chip fab machine under performance not a lens or camera problem.</p>
<p>Canon is a much larger company but it will be hit with a wider loss since most of their products suffered from lack of new orders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
