<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5D Mark II Firmware 1.1.0 Available</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/5d-mark-ii-firmware-110-available/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/5d-mark-ii-firmware-110-available/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:40:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Peret</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/5d-mark-ii-firmware-110-available/comment-page-1/#comment-12357</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Peret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 05:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2062#comment-12357</guid>
		<description>Awesome! Works great! Well done CanonÃ¢â‚¬Â¦ I Love work with my 5D Mark II!!! Updated : everything is ok, thanks Canon and Canon Rumors !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome! Works great! Well done CanonÃ¢â‚¬Â¦ I Love work with my 5D Mark II!!! Updated : everything is ok, thanks Canon and Canon Rumors !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/5d-mark-ii-firmware-110-available/comment-page-1/#comment-12067</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2062#comment-12067</guid>
		<description>forgive me but I don&#039;t see how that is a problem with Canon and their products, it is a problem that video cameras have with flickering light sources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>forgive me but I don&#8217;t see how that is a problem with Canon and their products, it is a problem that video cameras have with flickering light sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fade</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/5d-mark-ii-firmware-110-available/comment-page-1/#comment-12065</link>
		<dc:creator>fade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2062#comment-12065</guid>
		<description>and how about that you can only use shutter speed of 1/50 if you shoot anywhere else than under natural light (sun)? Would you be fine if there were only 1/60 shutter speed in the camera?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and how about that you can only use shutter speed of 1/50 if you shoot anywhere else than under natural light (sun)? Would you be fine if there were only 1/60 shutter speed in the camera?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fade</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/5d-mark-ii-firmware-110-available/comment-page-1/#comment-12064</link>
		<dc:creator>fade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2062#comment-12064</guid>
		<description>Yes you can do it in post, but the quality after that is something you are not going to use in professional production.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes you can do it in post, but the quality after that is something you are not going to use in professional production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/5d-mark-ii-firmware-110-available/comment-page-1/#comment-12062</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2062#comment-12062</guid>
		<description>Nikon fanboi much?

you can convert from NTSC to PAL in post, I&#039;m not saying that Canon shouldn&#039;t have it, but its not the catastrophy you&#039;re making it out to be</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikon fanboi much?</p>
<p>you can convert from NTSC to PAL in post, I&#8217;m not saying that Canon shouldn&#8217;t have it, but its not the catastrophy you&#8217;re making it out to be</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fade</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/5d-mark-ii-firmware-110-available/comment-page-1/#comment-12059</link>
		<dc:creator>fade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2062#comment-12059</guid>
		<description>Canon updates 5D manual controls but it&#039;s still ntsc-only camera. There&#039;s new Nikon coming that will have 25p mode too. Wait for that one, don&#039;t buy Canon. 30p is useless in PAL countries (= most of the world).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon updates 5D manual controls but it&#8217;s still ntsc-only camera. There&#8217;s new Nikon coming that will have 25p mode too. Wait for that one, don&#8217;t buy Canon. 30p is useless in PAL countries (= most of the world).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ^_^</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/5d-mark-ii-firmware-110-available/comment-page-1/#comment-11043</link>
		<dc:creator>^_^</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 08:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2062#comment-11043</guid>
		<description>In Malaysia, there is only one shutter 1/50 for indoor shooting, because we are running in PAL 50Hz electricity, 

So nevertheless the 30P mode give us the freedom to choose this speed. Cheers Canon, but it will be better if you enable 24/25 fps Video, if not, i think it&#039;s ok to stick on 1/50 Shutter running at 30fps.... cheers man</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Malaysia, there is only one shutter 1/50 for indoor shooting, because we are running in PAL 50Hz electricity, </p>
<p>So nevertheless the 30P mode give us the freedom to choose this speed. Cheers Canon, but it will be better if you enable 24/25 fps Video, if not, i think it&#8217;s ok to stick on 1/50 Shutter running at 30fps&#8230;. cheers man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ^_^</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/5d-mark-ii-firmware-110-available/comment-page-1/#comment-11042</link>
		<dc:creator>^_^</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 07:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2062#comment-11042</guid>
		<description>Use the Sigma 50mm f1.4 on 5Dm2 taking video using ISO 3200 in dim light !! COOL MAN !!! Full Manual Video !!! COOL AWESOME!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use the Sigma 50mm f1.4 on 5Dm2 taking video using ISO 3200 in dim light !! COOL MAN !!! Full Manual Video !!! COOL AWESOME!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onno Nugteren</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/5d-mark-ii-firmware-110-available/comment-page-1/#comment-10962</link>
		<dc:creator>Onno Nugteren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2062#comment-10962</guid>
		<description>NOW CANON:
 CAN WE HAVE exposure compensation TOO?

WHY ARE YOU TEASING US, STAYING ARROGANT???
AM I SO NEGATIVE OR JUST REALISTIC?

SHOUTING LOUDLY:

SO BESIDES 24/25, SOUND, ALSO EXPOSURE COMPENSATION!!!!!!

SO BESIDES 24/25 SOUND ALSO EXPOSURE COMPENSATION!!!!!!
SO BESIDES 24/25 SOUND ALSO EXPOSURE COMPENSATION!!!!!!

WHO WANTS TO SHOUT WITH ME?
ONLY THEN WE CAN BE PLEASED WITCH SHOULD BE NORMAL.
 
With manual exposure mode selected and ISO set to Auto, there is one key automatic exposure feature missing, however: exposure compensation. This means you can&#039;t, for instance, dial in -1/3 to -2/3 of exposure compensation when working in bright frontlit sun, and this is often mandatory to keep 5D Mark II video from being too light and highlights being blown out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOW CANON:<br />
 CAN WE HAVE exposure compensation TOO?</p>
<p>WHY ARE YOU TEASING US, STAYING ARROGANT???<br />
AM I SO NEGATIVE OR JUST REALISTIC?</p>
<p>SHOUTING LOUDLY:</p>
<p>SO BESIDES 24/25, SOUND, ALSO EXPOSURE COMPENSATION!!!!!!</p>
<p>SO BESIDES 24/25 SOUND ALSO EXPOSURE COMPENSATION!!!!!!<br />
SO BESIDES 24/25 SOUND ALSO EXPOSURE COMPENSATION!!!!!!</p>
<p>WHO WANTS TO SHOUT WITH ME?<br />
ONLY THEN WE CAN BE PLEASED WITCH SHOULD BE NORMAL.</p>
<p>With manual exposure mode selected and ISO set to Auto, there is one key automatic exposure feature missing, however: exposure compensation. This means you can&#8217;t, for instance, dial in -1/3 to -2/3 of exposure compensation when working in bright frontlit sun, and this is often mandatory to keep 5D Mark II video from being too light and highlights being blown out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onno Nugteren</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/5d-mark-ii-firmware-110-available/comment-page-1/#comment-10886</link>
		<dc:creator>Onno Nugteren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 23:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2062#comment-10886</guid>
		<description>Yes Of course I mend 24/25 fps.
But what about what I stated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Of course I mend 24/25 fps.<br />
But what about what I stated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
