<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New 1D &amp; 1Ds in 2009? New &#8220;G&#8221; Thinking?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-1d-1ds-in-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-1d-1ds-in-2009/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:57:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-1d-1ds-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-32946</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2057#comment-32946</guid>
		<description>Good job,  lots of useful information. I thought I would leave my first comment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job,  lots of useful information. I thought I would leave my first comment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roy</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-1d-1ds-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-11624</link>
		<dc:creator>roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2057#comment-11624</guid>
		<description>Michael Wardson can easily be a Scandinavian name, then the poor language makes sense? Roy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Wardson can easily be a Scandinavian name, then the poor language makes sense? Roy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: regular</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-1d-1ds-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-10792</link>
		<dc:creator>regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2057#comment-10792</guid>
		<description>found this link on Fake Chuck website :
http://www.pictchallenge-archives.net/TESTNUM/D3_TGVautofocus.html

It is a quite impressive sequence of continuous shots with auto-focus, of the french high-speed train (rougthly 300Km/h), used to compare the performance of the D3 and 1D3 auto-focus functions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>found this link on Fake Chuck website :<br />
<a href="http://www.pictchallenge-archives.net/TESTNUM/D3_TGVautofocus.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pictchallenge-archives.net/TESTNUM/D3_TGVautofocus.html</a></p>
<p>It is a quite impressive sequence of continuous shots with auto-focus, of the french high-speed train (rougthly 300Km/h), used to compare the performance of the D3 and 1D3 auto-focus functions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-1d-1ds-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-10782</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2057#comment-10782</guid>
		<description>I agree with your conclussion.

The Ds typically has just over twice the resolution at half the framerate. So 36 isn&#039;t a bad guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your conclussion.</p>
<p>The Ds typically has just over twice the resolution at half the framerate. So 36 isn&#8217;t a bad guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-1d-1ds-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-10767</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 02:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2057#comment-10767</guid>
		<description>yes thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-1d-1ds-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-10759</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2057#comment-10759</guid>
		<description>That was atrocious. Get your coat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was atrocious. Get your coat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ossme</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-1d-1ds-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-10757</link>
		<dc:creator>ossme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2057#comment-10757</guid>
		<description>oh, thank you for correcting me. I missunderstood the whole phrase....

But, I don&#039;t think that would ever happen. Why? because  that will leave a big gap in EOS line. that means losing customer base because of the many professionals with existing invesment with no upgrade path. 

Therefore, I believe that If canon wants to enter the market of medium Format, then they will do it with a fresh product line other than the current EOS.

I&#039;m sure that the 1ds will be a FF with more pixels than the 1d (36MP?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, thank you for correcting me. I missunderstood the whole phrase&#8230;.</p>
<p>But, I don&#8217;t think that would ever happen. Why? because  that will leave a big gap in EOS line. that means losing customer base because of the many professionals with existing invesment with no upgrade path. </p>
<p>Therefore, I believe that If canon wants to enter the market of medium Format, then they will do it with a fresh product line other than the current EOS.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that the 1ds will be a FF with more pixels than the 1d (36MP?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-1d-1ds-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-10756</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2057#comment-10756</guid>
		<description>I just hope that Canon is focussed...........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just hope that Canon is focussed&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-1d-1ds-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-10748</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2057#comment-10748</guid>
		<description>I think you mean the Ds would have a larger than FF sensor.

I still think that would be a terrible Idea, since the lenses are made for 35mm. there really wouldn&#039;t be any point.  even the new T/S lenses have an image circle smaller than 645, and I&#039;m not in favor of Canon making a peculiar format, or actually going MF at all, their lenses don&#039;t have leaf shutters, and the x-sync on a FP shutter for MF would be terrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you mean the Ds would have a larger than FF sensor.</p>
<p>I still think that would be a terrible Idea, since the lenses are made for 35mm. there really wouldn&#8217;t be any point.  even the new T/S lenses have an image circle smaller than 645, and I&#8217;m not in favor of Canon making a peculiar format, or actually going MF at all, their lenses don&#8217;t have leaf shutters, and the x-sync on a FP shutter for MF would be terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-1d-1ds-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-10745</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2057#comment-10745</guid>
		<description>As said above, 24X36mm is not cropped, it is full frame. Teh implication of which is that the 1DIV would be bigger than full-frame. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As said above, 24X36mm is not cropped, it is full frame. Teh implication of which is that the 1DIV would be bigger than full-frame. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge (aka Furano, aka jfdpl686)</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-1d-1ds-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-10744</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge (aka Furano, aka jfdpl686)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2057#comment-10744</guid>
		<description>I know.. I tried to get the test as direct translated as I could.

And really, if you were an Spanish Speaking person, you would feel embarrassed for the poor language skills. Now, something weird is that the author is Michael Wardson (English name) so I&#039;m guessing it is a bad translation but I couldn&#039;t find anything on this person.

So this one, I don&#039;t believe it at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know.. I tried to get the test as direct translated as I could.</p>
<p>And really, if you were an Spanish Speaking person, you would feel embarrassed for the poor language skills. Now, something weird is that the author is Michael Wardson (English name) so I&#8217;m guessing it is a bad translation but I couldn&#8217;t find anything on this person.</p>
<p>So this one, I don&#8217;t believe it at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ossme</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-1d-1ds-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-10742</link>
		<dc:creator>ossme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2057#comment-10742</guid>
		<description>I will be sad if the 1d mark IV got a cropped sensor. It won&#039;t be good for my profession but I&#039;m sure that lots of sport photographers will be happy..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be sad if the 1d mark IV got a cropped sensor. It won&#8217;t be good for my profession but I&#8217;m sure that lots of sport photographers will be happy..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jouster</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-1d-1ds-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-10738</link>
		<dc:creator>jouster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2057#comment-10738</guid>
		<description>read the article much?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>read the article much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: max2 - Ã§ÂÂµÃ¤ÂºÂºÃ§â€¹Â©Ã¥Â½Â± &#187; Ã¦â€“Â°1DsÃ¥â€™Å’1DÃ¥Â¹Â´Ã¥Âºâ€¢Ã¤Â¸Å Ã¥Â¸â€š?</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-1d-1ds-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-10737</link>
		<dc:creator>max2 - Ã§ÂÂµÃ¤ÂºÂºÃ§â€¹Â©Ã¥Â½Â± &#187; Ã¦â€“Â°1DsÃ¥â€™Å’1DÃ¥Â¹Â´Ã¥Âºâ€¢Ã¤Â¸Å Ã¥Â¸â€š?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2057#comment-10737</guid>
		<description>[...] New 1D &amp; 1Ds in 2009? New &#8220;G&#8221; Ã‚Â Thinking, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New 1D &amp; 1Ds in 2009? New &#8220;G&#8221; Ã‚Â Thinking, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
