<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Lens Talk [CR1]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-lens-talk-cr1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-lens-talk-cr1/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:35:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Canon Rumors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New IS Lenses? [CR1]</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-lens-talk-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-13668</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New IS Lenses? [CR1]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2092#comment-13668</guid>
		<description>[...] #3 Could this confirm the new L macro rumor from a while back? An email and commenter think [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] #3 Could this confirm the new L macro rumor from a while back? An email and commenter think [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-lens-talk-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-13196</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2092#comment-13196</guid>
		<description>EF-S 18-105 IS please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EF-S 18-105 IS please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-lens-talk-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12063</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2092#comment-12063</guid>
		<description>Cannot find the 135L online at the major retailers....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cannot find the 135L online at the major retailers&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-lens-talk-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-11842</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2092#comment-11842</guid>
		<description>&quot;The 135 L is my favorite lens, and possibly the sharpest DSLR lens made.&quot;

Then you haven&#039;t been paying attention to what the Zeiss 135/1.8 for Sony is doing. There _is_ room for improvement. Not that they&#039;re a world apart, but the Zeiss is better (and a bit faster with 1.8).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The 135 L is my favorite lens, and possibly the sharpest DSLR lens made.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then you haven&#8217;t been paying attention to what the Zeiss 135/1.8 for Sony is doing. There _is_ room for improvement. Not that they&#8217;re a world apart, but the Zeiss is better (and a bit faster with 1.8).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Westy</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-lens-talk-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-11640</link>
		<dc:creator>Westy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2092#comment-11640</guid>
		<description>I use macro lenses most of the time.  I agree that a 180mm or 200mm macro with image stabilization would be a revolutionary lens.  Can you imagine how great it would be photograph in the field without having to tote and set up a tripod for every butterfly landing?  I think I would pay just about anything for such a weatherproof macro lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use macro lenses most of the time.  I agree that a 180mm or 200mm macro with image stabilization would be a revolutionary lens.  Can you imagine how great it would be photograph in the field without having to tote and set up a tripod for every butterfly landing?  I think I would pay just about anything for such a weatherproof macro lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-lens-talk-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-11395</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2092#comment-11395</guid>
		<description>The 135L seems to be gone from amazon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 135L seems to be gone from amazon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stark-Arts</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-lens-talk-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-11198</link>
		<dc:creator>Stark-Arts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 02:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2092#comment-11198</guid>
		<description>he said &quot;any kind of optical quality&quot; - the sigma is awful. For a company that can make some really nice primes it amazes me that they never seem to really hit the nail on the head</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he said &#8220;any kind of optical quality&#8221; &#8211; the sigma is awful. For a company that can make some really nice primes it amazes me that they never seem to really hit the nail on the head</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enjott</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-lens-talk-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-11184</link>
		<dc:creator>Enjott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 22:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2092#comment-11184</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d really like to have a fixed focal length lens with IS. I have little use for the variable focal length of a telephoto zoom, and I don&#039;t want to carry such a heavy 70-200/2.8 beast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d really like to have a fixed focal length lens with IS. I have little use for the variable focal length of a telephoto zoom, and I don&#8217;t want to carry such a heavy 70-200/2.8 beast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: regular</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-lens-talk-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-11180</link>
		<dc:creator>regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 21:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2092#comment-11180</guid>
		<description>looking back at Northern Lights&#039; article about Canon&#039;s mid term plans : 
http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/cameras/Canon_60D.html

&quot;Canon do not currently have many plans for the non L series primes, with most consumers in that market going for zooms or aspiring to a L series zoom. Given the need to do so much with the rest of the lens range over the next 3-4 years, don&#039;t hold your breath waiting for a a new 50/1.4 or the like.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looking back at Northern Lights&#8217; article about Canon&#8217;s mid term plans :<br />
<a href="http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/cameras/Canon_60D.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/cameras/Canon_60D.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Canon do not currently have many plans for the non L series primes, with most consumers in that market going for zooms or aspiring to a L series zoom. Given the need to do so much with the rest of the lens range over the next 3-4 years, don&#8217;t hold your breath waiting for a a new 50/1.4 or the like.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gnarf</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-lens-talk-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-11166</link>
		<dc:creator>gnarf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 18:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2092#comment-11166</guid>
		<description>sigma 12-24 is ff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sigma 12-24 is ff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-lens-talk-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-11147</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 13:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2092#comment-11147</guid>
		<description>I would like it if Canon updated there 28-200 and made a 24-200 3.5-4.5L IS. With the current 5D2 it would be an extreamly usfull lens, especially for Wedding Photography.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like it if Canon updated there 28-200 and made a 24-200 3.5-4.5L IS. With the current 5D2 it would be an extreamly usfull lens, especially for Wedding Photography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: niwayo</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-lens-talk-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-11137</link>
		<dc:creator>niwayo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 10:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2092#comment-11137</guid>
		<description>why not trying the Tokina 50-150mm instead of waiting for Canon?? I love it!! With my 17-55 f2.8 I  am complete!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why not trying the Tokina 50-150mm instead of waiting for Canon?? I love it!! With my 17-55 f2.8 I  am complete!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-lens-talk-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-11129</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 07:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2092#comment-11129</guid>
		<description>That 100-400L lens needs an update bigtime, hope they lose the push-pull design and add weather sealing and I would put it back in my collection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That 100-400L lens needs an update bigtime, hope they lose the push-pull design and add weather sealing and I would put it back in my collection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/new-lens-talk-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-11118</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 04:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2092#comment-11118</guid>
		<description>yup, totally agree with you, I don&#039;t see this lens getting any updates for at least a couple of years more, its sharpness will just hurt our eyes, LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yup, totally agree with you, I don&#8217;t see this lens getting any updates for at least a couple of years more, its sharpness will just hurt our eyes, LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
