<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Olympus E-P1?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/olympus-e-p1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/olympus-e-p1/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:35:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Suzuko</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/olympus-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-34149</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzuko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2096#comment-34149</guid>
		<description>She&#039;s so beautiful, anyone know her??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s so beautiful, anyone know her??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/olympus-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-11716</link>
		<dc:creator>Q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2096#comment-11716</guid>
		<description>Perhaps a bit gratuitous to add this here, but it is now official.

http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/product.asp?product=1461

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0906/09061601olympusep1.asp

Personally I like it with that 17 mm 2.8 pancake as a starter kit.  Sweet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps a bit gratuitous to add this here, but it is now official.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/product.asp?product=1461" rel="nofollow">http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/product.asp?product=1461</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0906/09061601olympusep1.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/news/0906/09061601olympusep1.asp</a></p>
<p>Personally I like it with that 17 mm 2.8 pancake as a starter kit.  Sweet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomas</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/olympus-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-11375</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2096#comment-11375</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting camera. Apparently it can take canon FD lenses with an adapter (no glass elements), already available on ebay. Now those f/1.2 could come back to life again. Also it can take Leica M lenses. The Panasonic one is already out and does all of that. Samsung is developing an APS-C version of this.

I also hope this camera means the extinction of the cr**** PS cameras. 1/2.5&quot; sensor is a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting camera. Apparently it can take canon FD lenses with an adapter (no glass elements), already available on ebay. Now those f/1.2 could come back to life again. Also it can take Leica M lenses. The Panasonic one is already out and does all of that. Samsung is developing an APS-C version of this.</p>
<p>I also hope this camera means the extinction of the cr**** PS cameras. 1/2.5&#8243; sensor is a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/olympus-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-11254</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 05:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2096#comment-11254</guid>
		<description>No, it looks like a digital version of the Olympus Pen F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it looks like a digital version of the Olympus Pen F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike V</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/olympus-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-11253</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2096#comment-11253</guid>
		<description>I know what you mean.

Back in the day, I had this tiny Canon point and shoot with a 24mm prime lens that I won at a trade show.

The lens was very sharp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what you mean.</p>
<p>Back in the day, I had this tiny Canon point and shoot with a 24mm prime lens that I won at a trade show.</p>
<p>The lens was very sharp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finch</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/olympus-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-11231</link>
		<dc:creator>Finch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2096#comment-11231</guid>
		<description>Thats pretty cool, but I was hoping it would look like this. I&#039;m sure this one is entirely a concept model as there are no markings on the top, but I really liked the design.

http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/oima_slr_microfourthirds.asp?intCmp=oima_mftsignup_smchip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats pretty cool, but I was hoping it would look like this. I&#8217;m sure this one is entirely a concept model as there are no markings on the top, but I really liked the design.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/oima_slr_microfourthirds.asp?intCmp=oima_mftsignup_smchip" rel="nofollow">http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/oima_slr_microfourthirds.asp?intCmp=oima_mftsignup_smchip</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/olympus-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-11192</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2096#comment-11192</guid>
		<description>cause Oly is pushing at the four-thirds standard :eek:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cause Oly is pushing at the four-thirds standard :eek:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: regular</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/olympus-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-11179</link>
		<dc:creator>regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 21:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2096#comment-11179</guid>
		<description>So I guess M-mount lenses can be used via the previously announced Panasonic adaptors, right?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0905/09052101panasonicadaptors.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I guess M-mount lenses can be used via the previously announced Panasonic adaptors, right?<br />
<a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0905/09052101panasonicadaptors.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/news/0905/09052101panasonicadaptors.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/olympus-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-11177</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 20:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2096#comment-11177</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s quite ugly (compared to the Leica, although less compared to the Panny equivalent), but I guess it&#039;s the quality that comes out that&#039;s most important. That will be interesting. Does it support RAW?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s quite ugly (compared to the Leica, although less compared to the Panny equivalent), but I guess it&#8217;s the quality that comes out that&#8217;s most important. That will be interesting. Does it support RAW?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOOF</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/olympus-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-11152</link>
		<dc:creator>DOOF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2096#comment-11152</guid>
		<description>True... looking through my OM10 viewfinder, I keep wondering how back in the day Olympus &amp; others made 35mm film _SLRs_ that were pocketable-size, complete with optics that that would today be called &quot;micro&quot;... that was normal size back then!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True&#8230; looking through my OM10 viewfinder, I keep wondering how back in the day Olympus &amp; others made 35mm film _SLRs_ that were pocketable-size, complete with optics that that would today be called &#8220;micro&#8221;&#8230; that was normal size back then!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike V</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/olympus-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-11145</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 12:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2096#comment-11145</guid>
		<description>The sensor is still pretty small though.

2x crop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sensor is still pretty small though.</p>
<p>2x crop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ossme</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/olympus-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-11140</link>
		<dc:creator>ossme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 11:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2096#comment-11140</guid>
		<description>lol, Sorry mate. But don&#039;t look at me when you see a huge poster of cute chick with lepstick and full makeup holding this camera near to up her face!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, Sorry mate. But don&#8217;t look at me when you see a huge poster of cute chick with lepstick and full makeup holding this camera near to up her face!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Multi Pass</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/olympus-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-11134</link>
		<dc:creator>Multi Pass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 08:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2096#comment-11134</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m using Oly Zuiko&#039;s on the 5Dmk II.. GREAT lenses.
I also used the OM4 which is still the best 35mm body ever imo!
Its TLL is fabulous and its something I miss on DSLR&#039;s :)

I&#039;m not into the Oly DSLR&#039;s but this one looks nice. :)
If it excepts the old Zuiko&#039;s with an adapter it would be heaven. A 21mm F2 on that sucka :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using Oly Zuiko&#8217;s on the 5Dmk II.. GREAT lenses.<br />
I also used the OM4 which is still the best 35mm body ever imo!<br />
Its TLL is fabulous and its something I miss on DSLR&#8217;s :)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not into the Oly DSLR&#8217;s but this one looks nice. :)<br />
If it excepts the old Zuiko&#8217;s with an adapter it would be heaven. A 21mm F2 on that sucka :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/olympus-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-11132</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 08:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2096#comment-11132</guid>
		<description>dammit! you&#039;ve just ruined the camera for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dammit! you&#8217;ve just ruined the camera for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
