<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: T1/2000D Announcement Next Tuesday? [CR2]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/t1i2000d-announcement-next-tuesday-cr2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/t1i2000d-announcement-next-tuesday-cr2/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:50:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/t1i2000d-announcement-next-tuesday-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-35327</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 11:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2138#comment-35327</guid>
		<description>may I ask? why are you so fond of bathroom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>may I ask? why are you so fond of bathroom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: regular</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/t1i2000d-announcement-next-tuesday-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-12446</link>
		<dc:creator>regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2138#comment-12446</guid>
		<description>It is too late for availability during summer vacations anyway, so maybe Canon decided to delay the announcement to learn more about Nikon D3000 specs and price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is too late for availability during summer vacations anyway, so maybe Canon decided to delay the announcement to learn more about Nikon D3000 specs and price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/t1i2000d-announcement-next-tuesday-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-12405</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2138#comment-12405</guid>
		<description>true, I must give you that, though those people are *slightly* less prevalent on CR than NR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>true, I must give you that, though those people are *slightly* less prevalent on CR than NR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steakhachai</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/t1i2000d-announcement-next-tuesday-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-12401</link>
		<dc:creator>steakhachai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2138#comment-12401</guid>
		<description>So? No announcement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So? No announcement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Gillette</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/t1i2000d-announcement-next-tuesday-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-12270</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Gillette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2138#comment-12270</guid>
		<description>What about the new 35mm 1.8 USM? A possibility for next week?

That&#039;s what I&#039;m talkin&#039; about!!

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the new 35mm 1.8 USM? A possibility for next week?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m talkin&#8217; about!!</p>
<p>:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/t1i2000d-announcement-next-tuesday-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-12267</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2138#comment-12267</guid>
		<description>@ rwpl

I was thinking more refreshes of a few of the older zooms.  a wider zoom.  like nikon 14-24, a 200-400, also a nikon idea, and something similar to the sigma 120-300 f/2.8.  I would also expect to see refreshes of the entire macro line, adding IS to them as well as optical improvements.  I also expect refresh of the 45mm and 90mm TS-E lenses, and the 35mm f/1.4.  I would like a fisheye with USM motor and weather sealing (presumably L-series).  The entire super tele line-up is do for refresh soon.  they&#039;re 10 years old now.  They don&#039;t really need it from an optical standpoint, but they could be made somewhat smaller and lighter with current technolgy, and the IS would be much improved.

Personally I would like to see something similar to the leica tri-elmar lenses, where rather than being a zoom it contains three distinct focal lengths.  This would be ideal if they could practically exceed a 2.8 aperture for them.  think about a 50 f/1.4, a 85mm f/1.8, and a 100 f/2 in a single package.

@ fred.  28mm macro?  why bother with a macro at such a wide focal length, you get no working distance if you&#039;re close enough to have any kind of magnification.  also 28mm prime exists, could use refreshes though.  there are f/2.8 cheap and f/1.8 with USM versions.

also what is the advantage of pancake lenses? legit question, I honestly don&#039;t get how having a tiny lens is good, small I understand, Tiny doesn&#039;t make sense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ rwpl</p>
<p>I was thinking more refreshes of a few of the older zooms.  a wider zoom.  like nikon 14-24, a 200-400, also a nikon idea, and something similar to the sigma 120-300 f/2.8.  I would also expect to see refreshes of the entire macro line, adding IS to them as well as optical improvements.  I also expect refresh of the 45mm and 90mm TS-E lenses, and the 35mm f/1.4.  I would like a fisheye with USM motor and weather sealing (presumably L-series).  The entire super tele line-up is do for refresh soon.  they&#8217;re 10 years old now.  They don&#8217;t really need it from an optical standpoint, but they could be made somewhat smaller and lighter with current technolgy, and the IS would be much improved.</p>
<p>Personally I would like to see something similar to the leica tri-elmar lenses, where rather than being a zoom it contains three distinct focal lengths.  This would be ideal if they could practically exceed a 2.8 aperture for them.  think about a 50 f/1.4, a 85mm f/1.8, and a 100 f/2 in a single package.</p>
<p>@ fred.  28mm macro?  why bother with a macro at such a wide focal length, you get no working distance if you&#8217;re close enough to have any kind of magnification.  also 28mm prime exists, could use refreshes though.  there are f/2.8 cheap and f/1.8 with USM versions.</p>
<p>also what is the advantage of pancake lenses? legit question, I honestly don&#8217;t get how having a tiny lens is good, small I understand, Tiny doesn&#8217;t make sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/t1i2000d-announcement-next-tuesday-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-12258</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2138#comment-12258</guid>
		<description>EF-S Lenses...? could use a 28mm prime, a 28mm macro, and a 24mm pancake!  Zooms annoy me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EF-S Lenses&#8230;? could use a 28mm prime, a 28mm macro, and a 24mm pancake!  Zooms annoy me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/t1i2000d-announcement-next-tuesday-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-12237</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2138#comment-12237</guid>
		<description>so it clearly has not begun then...sorry couldn&#039;t help it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so it clearly has not begun then&#8230;sorry couldn&#8217;t help it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rwpl</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/t1i2000d-announcement-next-tuesday-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-12227</link>
		<dc:creator>rwpl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2138#comment-12227</guid>
		<description>what kind of lenses are you still missing in Canon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what kind of lenses are you still missing in Canon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rwpl</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/t1i2000d-announcement-next-tuesday-cr2/comment-page-1/#comment-12226</link>
		<dc:creator>rwpl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2138#comment-12226</guid>
		<description>heh never heard of N,C giving tips to rumor sites. unless they do it to do some marketing research (which would be a terrible idea IMO).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh never heard of N,C giving tips to rumor sites. unless they do it to do some marketing research (which would be a terrible idea IMO).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
