Comments on: “The Lord of Darkness” [CR1] http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/the-lord-of-darkness-cr1/ You gotta know Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:23:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Natalie http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/the-lord-of-darkness-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-39739 Natalie Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:44:05 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2072#comment-39739 Ich lese deinen Blog jetzt doch schon eine ganze weile aber irgendwie hab ich nie einen Kommentar zu deinen Artikeln geschrieben. Wollte jetzt aber endlich mal ein Lob aussprechen, sind richtig gute Artikel welche du hier jedes mal schreibst. Ich hoffe es kommen noch einige weitere interessante Artikel. Ich lese deinen Blog jetzt doch schon eine ganze weile aber irgendwie hab ich nie einen Kommentar zu deinen Artikeln geschrieben. Wollte jetzt aber endlich mal ein Lob aussprechen, sind richtig gute Artikel welche du hier jedes mal schreibst. Ich hoffe es kommen noch einige weitere interessante Artikel.

]]> By: Lee Pyotr http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/the-lord-of-darkness-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-38894 Lee Pyotr Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:36:40 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2072#comment-38894 Hi - really great website you have created. I enjoyed reading this posting. I did want to write a remark to tell you that the design of this site is very aesthetically delightful. I used to be a graphic designer, now I am a copy editor for a marketing firm. I have always enjoyed working with computers and am attempting to learn code in my free time (which there is never enough of lol). Hi – really great website you have created. I enjoyed reading this posting. I did want to write a remark to tell you that the design of this site is very aesthetically delightful. I used to be a graphic designer, now I am a copy editor for a marketing firm. I have always enjoyed working with computers and am attempting to learn code in my free time (which there is never enough of lol).

]]> By: hans http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/the-lord-of-darkness-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12506 hans Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:10:21 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2072#comment-12506 APS-H has no future in my opinion. pros must have FF, semi-pros wanna have FF (but even 5D2 is on the limit of what they wanna spend), and beginners need something cheap camera - and APS-C fits them I wanna see more FF products. even some simpler models - a 60D FF would be perfect ;-) APS-H has no future in my opinion.
pros must have FF, semi-pros wanna have FF (but even 5D2 is on the limit of what they wanna spend), and beginners need something cheap camera – and APS-C fits them

I wanna see more FF products. even some simpler models – a 60D FF would be perfect ;-)

]]> By: Canon Rumors » Blog Archive » “The Lord of Darkness” [CR1] | 7D http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/the-lord-of-darkness-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12303 Canon Rumors » Blog Archive » “The Lord of Darkness” [CR1] | 7D Sat, 27 Jun 2009 15:56:04 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2072#comment-12303 [...] 1N RS (1D), 3 (5D2), A2 (50D), Elan (Rebel T1i), Rebel (Rebel … View original post here: Canon Rumors » Blog Archive » “The Lord of Darkness” [CR1] Post a [...] [...] 1N RS (1D), 3 (5D2), A2 (50D), Elan (Rebel T1i), Rebel (Rebel … View original post here: Canon Rumors » Blog Archive » “The Lord of Darkness” [CR1] Post a [...]

]]> By: David http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/the-lord-of-darkness-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-11250 David Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:53:38 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2072#comment-11250 Zac, aside from the lack of 14-24 2.8 I think Canon is quite on par with Nikon's wide angle offerings, and besting them with the 17 TSE as Nikon doesn't have one. I think who makes the top lenses varies between the two companies lens per lens, not really wide vs. tele. I'm all for new Canon L glass though so I'd love to see some more wide L's such as a 14-35 2.8L replacing the 16-35. Zac, aside from the lack of 14-24 2.8 I think Canon is quite on par with Nikon’s wide angle offerings, and besting them with the 17 TSE as Nikon doesn’t have one. I think who makes the top lenses varies between the two companies lens per lens, not really wide vs. tele. I’m all for new Canon L glass though so I’d love to see some more wide L’s such as a 14-35 2.8L replacing the 16-35.

]]> By: Zac http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/the-lord-of-darkness-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-11235 Zac Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:22:22 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2072#comment-11235 David, I did not mean that Canon wide-angle lenses are bad, rather that, as a general rule, contemporary nikon wide-angles are a bit better. for example, the 14-24 f/2.8 and the EF 16-35 f/2.8L USM II. TSE is a bit separate from the focal length, and Canon has always spanked Nikon with these. I also love my 24-70mm f/2.8L USM, but, having played with the nikon it is marginally better. Of course it better be, since its so much newer and more expensive than its Canon counterpart. Of course, Canon will eventually release an updated 24-70 or equivalent, and this will beat the nikon lens. I did mean to say the Canon 24-70 is bad. David, I did not mean that Canon wide-angle lenses are bad, rather that, as a general rule, contemporary nikon wide-angles are a bit better. for example, the 14-24 f/2.8 and the EF 16-35 f/2.8L USM II.

TSE is a bit separate from the focal length, and Canon has always spanked Nikon with these.

I also love my 24-70mm f/2.8L USM, but, having played with the nikon it is marginally better. Of course it better be, since its so much newer and more expensive than its Canon counterpart. Of course, Canon will eventually release an updated 24-70 or equivalent, and this will beat the nikon lens. I did mean to say the Canon 24-70 is bad.

]]> By: Zac http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/the-lord-of-darkness-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-11234 Zac Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:18:17 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2072#comment-11234 disregard disregard

]]> By: Zac http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/the-lord-of-darkness-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-11233 Zac Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:10:31 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2072#comment-11233 further clarification. contemporary nikon equivalent will be better is a general rule, there are plenty of exceptions, for example the EF-S 10-22 beat the crap out of the nikon 12-24 f/4, and the nikon was considered to be a pro lens and the canon isn't the examples i have for supporting the "contemporary nikon equivalent will be better" claim are the nikon 14mm prime, which was a bit better than the canon 14mm f/2.8L, series 1, not series 2, which beats the nikon. and the 14-24 f/2.8, which is a stellar lens, and beats the canon 16-35mm f/2.8L USM II, which is still a wonderful lens, (often my lens of choice) further clarification. contemporary nikon equivalent will be better is a general rule, there are plenty of exceptions, for example the EF-S 10-22 beat the crap out of the nikon 12-24 f/4, and the nikon was considered to be a pro lens and the canon isn’t

the examples i have for supporting the “contemporary nikon equivalent will be better” claim are the nikon 14mm prime, which was a bit better than the canon 14mm f/2.8L, series 1, not series 2, which beats the nikon. and the 14-24 f/2.8, which is a stellar lens, and beats the canon 16-35mm f/2.8L USM II, which is still a wonderful lens, (often my lens of choice)

]]> By: David http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/the-lord-of-darkness-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-11188 David Sun, 07 Jun 2009 23:45:01 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2072#comment-11188 Ah. Lots of things could be more logical, doesn't make them reality though. Ah. Lots of things could be more logical, doesn’t make them reality though.

]]> By: Anthony http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/06/the-lord-of-darkness-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-11181 Anthony Sun, 07 Jun 2009 21:44:20 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2072#comment-11181 He knows that. He's saying what he would consider to be logical in the future. He knows that. He’s saying what he would consider to be logical in the future.

]]>