<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: *UPDATED* 70-200 f/2.8L IS Discontinuation Confirmed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/70-200-f2-8l-is-discontinuation-confirmed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/70-200-f2-8l-is-discontinuation-confirmed/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:09:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Canon Rumors Ã‚Â» Blog Archive Ã‚Â» *UPDATED* 70-200 f/2.8L IS &#8230; &#124; 7D</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/70-200-f2-8l-is-discontinuation-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-14029</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors Ã‚Â» Blog Archive Ã‚Â» *UPDATED* 70-200 f/2.8L IS &#8230; &#124; 7D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 03:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2193#comment-14029</guid>
		<description>[...] is going to take the IS out of the Lens and finally move it to the body. &#8230;     Read more: Canon Rumors Ã‚Â» Blog Archive Ã‚Â» *UPDATED* 70-200 f/2.8L IS &#8230;               Post a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is going to take the IS out of the Lens and finally move it to the body. &#8230;     Read more: Canon Rumors Ã‚Â» Blog Archive Ã‚Â» *UPDATED* 70-200 f/2.8L IS &#8230;               Post a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Canon Hybrid IS world&#8217;s first image stabilizer to compensate for two types of camera shake &#124; Pompo Multimedia</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/70-200-f2-8l-is-discontinuation-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-13786</link>
		<dc:creator>New Canon Hybrid IS world&#8217;s first image stabilizer to compensate for two types of camera shake &#124; Pompo Multimedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2193#comment-13786</guid>
		<description>[...] Could that be the reason why Adorama doesn&#8217;t have in stock the CanonÃ‚Â 70-200 f/2.8L IS ? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Could that be the reason why Adorama doesn&#8217;t have in stock the CanonÃ‚Â 70-200 f/2.8L IS ? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John.B</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/70-200-f2-8l-is-discontinuation-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-13743</link>
		<dc:creator>John.B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2193#comment-13743</guid>
		<description>As if on cue: http://www.usa.canon.com/templatedata/pressrelease/20090722_hybrid_is.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As if on cue: <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/templatedata/pressrelease/20090722_hybrid_is.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.usa.canon.com/templatedata/pressrelease/20090722_hybrid_is.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zach</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/70-200-f2-8l-is-discontinuation-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-13674</link>
		<dc:creator>zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2193#comment-13674</guid>
		<description>but white lens make you look pro...dont you know white lens + big lens hood= pro photographer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but white lens make you look pro&#8230;dont you know white lens + big lens hood= pro photographer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/70-200-f2-8l-is-discontinuation-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-13670</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2193#comment-13670</guid>
		<description>That make sense Dave.  I didn&#039;t consider the video factor, but yes -- now that you pointed it out -- Canon will no doubt be working on a Panasonic like lens with continuous iris and silent focussing etc.

cheers,
chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That make sense Dave.  I didn&#8217;t consider the video factor, but yes &#8212; now that you pointed it out &#8212; Canon will no doubt be working on a Panasonic like lens with continuous iris and silent focussing etc.</p>
<p>cheers,<br />
chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/70-200-f2-8l-is-discontinuation-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-13644</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2193#comment-13644</guid>
		<description>The new factory is back on :) Hope they are processing lots of Florite there soon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new factory is back on :) Hope they are processing lots of Florite there soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pompo</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/70-200-f2-8l-is-discontinuation-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-13629</link>
		<dc:creator>Pompo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2193#comment-13629</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t understand what is all the fuss about? There are quite a few Canon  lenses not available at Adorama or B&amp;H with no ETA ...the economy is screwed that&#039;s why nobody knows when they will be available...Canon even delayed the building of a new factory &#039;cause the economy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t understand what is all the fuss about? There are quite a few Canon  lenses not available at Adorama or B&amp;H with no ETA &#8230;the economy is screwed that&#8217;s why nobody knows when they will be available&#8230;Canon even delayed the building of a new factory &#8217;cause the economy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John.B</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/70-200-f2-8l-is-discontinuation-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-13626</link>
		<dc:creator>John.B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2193#comment-13626</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know.

A few weeks ago I spoke to a Canon field rep (n.b. a Canon employee) at a Macro class he was teaching.  When I brought up this *exact* topic -- specifically the handhold-ability of my 100mm f/2.8 Macro -- he explained that stabilization is only designed to counteract camera shake around the x and y axises.  He claimed a proper IS design for macro lenses would also require z axis stabilization.

Whether true or not, that was his reasoning why there wasn&#039;t IS on either the 100mm or 180mm L macro lenses.  And he didn&#039;t hold any hope that would change any time soon (regardless that the Nikon 105mm macro lens already has VR).

I&#039;m not saying you are wrong, in fact I hope you are right.  But I *am* saying I didn&#039;t get the impression this would change any time soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>A few weeks ago I spoke to a Canon field rep (n.b. a Canon employee) at a Macro class he was teaching.  When I brought up this *exact* topic &#8212; specifically the handhold-ability of my 100mm f/2.8 Macro &#8212; he explained that stabilization is only designed to counteract camera shake around the x and y axises.  He claimed a proper IS design for macro lenses would also require z axis stabilization.</p>
<p>Whether true or not, that was his reasoning why there wasn&#8217;t IS on either the 100mm or 180mm L macro lenses.  And he didn&#8217;t hold any hope that would change any time soon (regardless that the Nikon 105mm macro lens already has VR).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying you are wrong, in fact I hope you are right.  But I *am* saying I didn&#8217;t get the impression this would change any time soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/70-200-f2-8l-is-discontinuation-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-13625</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2193#comment-13625</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t worry about future upgrades. First off the lenses are so hard to find at first (1st year). Second they are so expensive (50-100% more than their predecessor) that it almost becomes moot. 

To your question: Canon likes the 77mm filter size so you should be safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t worry about future upgrades. First off the lenses are so hard to find at first (1st year). Second they are so expensive (50-100% more than their predecessor) that it almost becomes moot. </p>
<p>To your question: Canon likes the 77mm filter size so you should be safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sleeping Dude</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/70-200-f2-8l-is-discontinuation-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-13623</link>
		<dc:creator>Sleeping Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2193#comment-13623</guid>
		<description>When (if) upgrade to 70-200 or 24-70 comes out, do you think it is safe to assume they will remain 77mm ? I&#039;m just about to spend some cash on filters while waiting for some new lenses announcement...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When (if) upgrade to 70-200 or 24-70 comes out, do you think it is safe to assume they will remain 77mm ? I&#8217;m just about to spend some cash on filters while waiting for some new lenses announcement&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/70-200-f2-8l-is-discontinuation-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-13605</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 08:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2193#comment-13605</guid>
		<description>walloper</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>walloper</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/70-200-f2-8l-is-discontinuation-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-13601</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 06:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2193#comment-13601</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know...sounds pricey to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know&#8230;sounds pricey to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/70-200-f2-8l-is-discontinuation-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-13600</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 06:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2193#comment-13600</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s fairly speculative</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s fairly speculative</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen Oster</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/70-200-f2-8l-is-discontinuation-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-13598</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen Oster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 06:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2193#comment-13598</guid>
		<description>http://www.lensrentals.com/news/2009.04.24/state-of-the-slr-industry-2009</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lensrentals.com/news/2009.04.24/state-of-the-slr-industry-2009" rel="nofollow">http://www.lensrentals.com/news/2009.04.24/state-of-the-slr-industry-2009</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
