Comments on: Canon develops Hybrid image stabilization system

By: Can i use a 18-55 lens for portrait photography? what are the negative effects? | Photography Lenses

Fri, 07 Aug 2009 19:49:49 +0000

[...] Canon Rumors Ã‚Â» Blog Archive Ã‚Â» Canon develops Hybrid ikon … [...]

By: I am studding at a photography college and my professor of architecture photograph told me Nikon 20mm lenses ? | Photography Lenses

Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:16:07 +0000

[...] Canon Rumors Ã‚Â» Blog Archive Ã‚Â» Canon develops Hybrid ikon … [...]

By: Canon lanseazÃ„Æ’ Hybrid Image Stabilizer «

Canon lanseazÃ„Æ’ Hybrid Image Stabilizer « — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:50:16 +0000

[...] ÃˆËœtirea AICI [...]

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:49:29 +0000

<>you’re wrong! better put this technology in the lens!!!

By: What lenses should I buy with a Canon EOS 30D for nature photography? | Photography Lenses

Sat, 25 Jul 2009 18:17:56 +0000

[...] Canon Rumors Ã‚Â» Blog Archive Ã‚Â» Canon develops Hybrid ikon … [...]

By: David

David — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 21:23:41 +0000

which? the new IS or the jonas bros?

By: Zac

Zac — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:53:52 +0000

but they make little girl’s ginies tickle!!! (spell check needed on the ginies, but what the hay)

By: Zac

Zac — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:52:47 +0000

In body and in lens IS would probably interfere with each other and the system would most likely use in less IS when available and otherwise use sensor based IS

By: Roberto

Roberto — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:29:50 +0000

@canon:

yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawwwn.

(sry. dont mean to offend anyone here, but an new IS is as unnecessary as the jonas bros)

By: dude

dude — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 04:52:51 +0000

I have always wondered if we might see a day where Canon puts IS in the body AND keeps it in some lenses and has the two talk to each other to give SUPER IS. I know, I am dreaming, but it seems as if you could design them to be complementary and still have the in-body IS beneficial to non-IS lenses.

Now THAT would surely put the others makers back on their heals, BUT I can only imagine how complex it would be. Not likely, I know. Maybe a maker on the fringe, without a conservative base to shock, will do synergistic IS to rock the mainstream makers like Canon and Nikon.

Where is Sony in all of this?

By: Zac

Zac — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 04:47:29 +0000

allows for simpler and sharper optical design while still allowing for IS at wider focal lengths. It’s not an issue in telephoto’s, but it is with wide-angle lenses. Imagine a 14mm with 5 stop IS, that’s handholdable at over a second. that opens a lot of windows

By: Anthony

Anthony — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 02:02:00 +0000

The argument is that having it in body would:

1) Let it work with *any* existing lens
2) Save money because each lens wouldn’t need a separate IS system onboard.

By: HighBreed

HighBreed — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:44:45 +0000

Canon has a unique advantage with the MP-E 65mm.
In the field of plants and insects I find this lens to be unbeatable.
Almost a decade old and still amazing.
Hopefully if they do come out with a new macro lens utilizing this new technology that it will be able to have such a strong magnification like the 65mm.

By: David

David — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:55:57 +0000

I like the 100-400, use it often, but it really needs an update more than any of the other L lenses IMO.