<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon EOS 3D [CR1]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-3d-cr1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-3d-cr1/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:25:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Luna</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-43552</link>
		<dc:creator>Luna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2165#comment-43552</guid>
		<description>3D should be an either a full frame with a decent MP or a APS-H sensor. but most likely its an APS-H. for speed like maybe around 7-8 FPS, 7D had hit the jackpot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3D should be an either a full frame with a decent MP or a APS-H sensor. but most likely its an APS-H. for speed like maybe around 7-8 FPS, 7D had hit the jackpot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luna</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-43551</link>
		<dc:creator>Luna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2165#comment-43551</guid>
		<description>and eye controlled AF? that should be very interesting one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and eye controlled AF? that should be very interesting one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luna</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-43543</link>
		<dc:creator>Luna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2165#comment-43543</guid>
		<description>Canon will make that numbering. 1d, 3D, 5D, 7D. but not sure with the 9D anyway. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon will make that numbering. 1d, 3D, 5D, 7D. but not sure with the 9D anyway. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonard</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-30855</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2165#comment-30855</guid>
		<description>you realise this source is exactly spot on...

7D = similar body to 5D2
7D = somewhere in between 1D3 and 50D
7D = announced after D300s

ok he called it a 3D but the camera&#039;s concept was correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you realise this source is exactly spot on&#8230;</p>
<p>7D = similar body to 5D2<br />
7D = somewhere in between 1D3 and 50D<br />
7D = announced after D300s</p>
<p>ok he called it a 3D but the camera&#8217;s concept was correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-16177</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2165#comment-16177</guid>
		<description>I hope that canon read this. 
A 3D will be all what I need. It ist &quot;the missing link&quot; between 5D an 1D!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope that canon read this.<br />
A 3D will be all what I need. It ist &#8220;the missing link&#8221; between 5D an 1D!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-14077</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2165#comment-14077</guid>
		<description>Ya.. a good friend has the D300, and it just wipes the floor with the 40D/50D. If canon doesn&#039;t shape up, I will be looking to jump ship. For those who haven&#039;t tried out a d300, I strongly suggest you do so. The AF system is such a huge step up from the canon a/f system on the aps-c cameras. I was blown away how &quot;mickey mouse&quot; the 9(?) a/f points are on the d50.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya.. a good friend has the D300, and it just wipes the floor with the 40D/50D. If canon doesn&#8217;t shape up, I will be looking to jump ship. For those who haven&#8217;t tried out a d300, I strongly suggest you do so. The AF system is such a huge step up from the canon a/f system on the aps-c cameras. I was blown away how &#8220;mickey mouse&#8221; the 9(?) a/f points are on the d50.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12992</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2165#comment-12992</guid>
		<description>eye control!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eye control!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Click with the most perfect style &#124; Festival Tickets</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12986</link>
		<dc:creator>Click with the most perfect style &#124; Festival Tickets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2165#comment-12986</guid>
		<description>[...] Canon EOS 3D [CR1] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canon EOS 3D [CR1] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shoot your paramount moments at quality traits &#124; Festival Tickets</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12977</link>
		<dc:creator>Shoot your paramount moments at quality traits &#124; Festival Tickets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 11:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2165#comment-12977</guid>
		<description>[...] Canon EOS 3D [CR1] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canon EOS 3D [CR1] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jono</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12940</link>
		<dc:creator>jono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2165#comment-12940</guid>
		<description>A 1.3 cam with decent specs and good IQ is precisely what Canon needs to bring out sap !!  to counter the huge gap that Nikon fills all too much with 300D etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 1.3 cam with decent specs and good IQ is precisely what Canon needs to bring out sap !!  to counter the huge gap that Nikon fills all too much with 300D etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redkamel</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12849</link>
		<dc:creator>redkamel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2165#comment-12849</guid>
		<description>I just bought a 5d mkII, so I&#039;m a little bummed about a 3d rumour (or 7d, whatever). Alas, I&#039;ll have to live with a ton of megapixels and a good enough AF (I dont shoot too much action anyways). Oh well...;-)

here are my specs for what I WAS looking for, and what the 3D could/should be, in a realistic manner

-15-16mp, with &gt;5dmkII noise performance
-New AF system, lies between the 1 series and 5 series, trickle down to xxD
-7-8 fps
-5d type weather seal
-no movies
-no built in grip
-1.3/1.6 crop
-$3.5-3.7K

of course the 1d would have to become...
20 mp
upgraded AF
11 fps
sealed
movies
built in grip

3d does make sense as a name; the only thing it has &quot;less&quot; than a 5d is the megapixels. Everything else is almost pro level...one would basically be paying above 5dmkII for better noise performance, FPS, and AF at the cost of 7 megapixels. 

Canon would thus have the following pro lineup: 1D for top of the line everything, 3D for birders and sports, 5D for landscapes and studios.

The only reason not to make/release it would be the cannibalization of 1d sales from crazy amateurs or budget conscious photogs. Of course, the 3d I described is also the 5d everyone wanted...so a 3d could also steal from the 5d mkII (IMO)...but at a higher price point, to Canons advantage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought a 5d mkII, so I&#8217;m a little bummed about a 3d rumour (or 7d, whatever). Alas, I&#8217;ll have to live with a ton of megapixels and a good enough AF (I dont shoot too much action anyways). Oh well&#8230;;-)</p>
<p>here are my specs for what I WAS looking for, and what the 3D could/should be, in a realistic manner</p>
<p>-15-16mp, with &gt;5dmkII noise performance<br />
-New AF system, lies between the 1 series and 5 series, trickle down to xxD<br />
-7-8 fps<br />
-5d type weather seal<br />
-no movies<br />
-no built in grip<br />
-1.3/1.6 crop<br />
-$3.5-3.7K</p>
<p>of course the 1d would have to become&#8230;<br />
20 mp<br />
upgraded AF<br />
11 fps<br />
sealed<br />
movies<br />
built in grip</p>
<p>3d does make sense as a name; the only thing it has &#8220;less&#8221; than a 5d is the megapixels. Everything else is almost pro level&#8230;one would basically be paying above 5dmkII for better noise performance, FPS, and AF at the cost of 7 megapixels. </p>
<p>Canon would thus have the following pro lineup: 1D for top of the line everything, 3D for birders and sports, 5D for landscapes and studios.</p>
<p>The only reason not to make/release it would be the cannibalization of 1d sales from crazy amateurs or budget conscious photogs. Of course, the 3d I described is also the 5d everyone wanted&#8230;so a 3d could also steal from the 5d mkII (IMO)&#8230;but at a higher price point, to Canons advantage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12827</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2165#comment-12827</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not ready to switch over it, but I agree that it is ridiculous that Canon haven&#039;t gotten this worked out yet, it was such a basic function on a film camera, and now its impossible with Canon digital? stupid...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not ready to switch over it, but I agree that it is ridiculous that Canon haven&#8217;t gotten this worked out yet, it was such a basic function on a film camera, and now its impossible with Canon digital? stupid&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12815</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 07:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2165#comment-12815</guid>
		<description>Will Canon ever put in a Multiple Exposure or Image Overlay like the Nikon D300 and above? I have been a failthful Canon user from film to digital for over 30 years. But, I am considering changing because of the Multiple Exposure feature in the Nikons. You cannot do the same thing in post processing with a 10 image multiple. And even if you could, it would take much too long and I would not bother. It is also helpful to see how much to defocus for  a 2 image multiple for the glowing effect like Tony Sweet and others use. If you can&#039;t see it in the camera and you&#039;ve defocused teh second image too much, you cannot fix that in the post processing and you&#039;ve lost the shot.

Canon are you listening, I know there are many of us that want multiple exposure features &quot;in camera&quot; not in post processing. I hope to be able to get it in a Canon rather than switching all my major glass over to Nikon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will Canon ever put in a Multiple Exposure or Image Overlay like the Nikon D300 and above? I have been a failthful Canon user from film to digital for over 30 years. But, I am considering changing because of the Multiple Exposure feature in the Nikons. You cannot do the same thing in post processing with a 10 image multiple. And even if you could, it would take much too long and I would not bother. It is also helpful to see how much to defocus for  a 2 image multiple for the glowing effect like Tony Sweet and others use. If you can&#8217;t see it in the camera and you&#8217;ve defocused teh second image too much, you cannot fix that in the post processing and you&#8217;ve lost the shot.</p>
<p>Canon are you listening, I know there are many of us that want multiple exposure features &#8220;in camera&#8221; not in post processing. I hope to be able to get it in a Canon rather than switching all my major glass over to Nikon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon Rumors Ã‚Â» Blog Archive Ã‚Â» Canon EOS 3D [CR1] &#124; 7D</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12783</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors Ã‚Â» Blog Archive Ã‚Â» Canon EOS 3D [CR1] &#124; 7D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2165#comment-12783</guid>
		<description>[...] the case. I would believe this rumor more if it was called Ã¢â‚¬Å“ 7D Ã¢â‚¬Â. &#8230;    Continue here: Canon Rumors Ã‚Â» Blog Archive Ã‚Â» Canon EOS 3D [CR1]               Post a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the case. I would believe this rumor more if it was called Ã¢â‚¬Å“ 7D Ã¢â‚¬Â. &#8230;    Continue here: Canon Rumors Ã‚Â» Blog Archive Ã‚Â» Canon EOS 3D [CR1]               Post a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
