<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon EOS 60D/7D &#8211; APS-H? [CR1]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-60d7d-aps-h-cr1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-60d7d-aps-h-cr1/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boracay Condos</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-60d7d-aps-h-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-47884</link>
		<dc:creator>Boracay Condos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2173#comment-47884</guid>
		<description>Great Post! This might be a little off topic but has anyone ever been to an island Boracay?  Its like that movie The Beach with Leonardo Dicaprio!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Post! This might be a little off topic but has anyone ever been to an island Boracay?  Its like that movie The Beach with Leonardo Dicaprio!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zizie Wimax</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-60d7d-aps-h-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-46096</link>
		<dc:creator>Zizie Wimax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2173#comment-46096</guid>
		<description>This is important!&#124;I try to show similar soulful message</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is important!|I try to show similar soulful message</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quazi Ahmed Hussain</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-60d7d-aps-h-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-44243</link>
		<dc:creator>Quazi Ahmed Hussain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2173#comment-44243</guid>
		<description>May I request to kindly let me know 3 fundamental differences between the APS-C and Full Frame sensors?  I use a 450D at present and contemplating a 5DMII for higher quality results from my L lenses.  Pls advise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I request to kindly let me know 3 fundamental differences between the APS-C and Full Frame sensors?  I use a 450D at present and contemplating a 5DMII for higher quality results from my L lenses.  Pls advise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Swan</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-60d7d-aps-h-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-14568</link>
		<dc:creator>John Swan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2173#comment-14568</guid>
		<description>The D300 killer is here.

Just in, specs as follows:

15.1MP
7.4fps
OLED 3&#039; display, 1.15m pixels
19 (yes, 19) point autofocus
ISO 100-25600
SDHC memory (!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The D300 killer is here.</p>
<p>Just in, specs as follows:</p>
<p>15.1MP<br />
7.4fps<br />
OLED 3&#8242; display, 1.15m pixels<br />
19 (yes, 19) point autofocus<br />
ISO 100-25600<br />
SDHC memory (!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Swan</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-60d7d-aps-h-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-14160</link>
		<dc:creator>John Swan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2173#comment-14160</guid>
		<description>Well said. Hopefully they won&#039;t spend too much time concentrating on trying to outdo competition on the video components and will work on where it matters, being the PQ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. Hopefully they won&#8217;t spend too much time concentrating on trying to outdo competition on the video components and will work on where it matters, being the PQ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-60d7d-aps-h-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-14076</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2173#comment-14076</guid>
		<description>I look forward to an actual upgrade to the 40D. Like others have said, the 50D just plain sucks (I was expecting something better than the 40D). I&#039;m a canon owner myself, and was considering making the jump to a 50D (I&#039;ve owned an XSi now for a little while, and feel I&#039;ve &quot;grown&quot; out of it), but the 50D is honestly just not worth it. I&#039;d be better off with a 40D. I&#039;ve played with a friend&#039;s 40D quite a bit, but don&#039;t feel it&#039;s necessarily worth the upgrade for me. anyway..

A friend has a d300, and I must say, it wipes the floor with the 40D/50D. It ALMOST made me want to sell all my lenses and switch to Nikon. What do I love about it? 2 main things.. PQ is outstanding (hands down beats the 50D), and the autofocus system is awesome for a casual photographer. You aren&#039;t stuck with a small diamond (like on canons), and can frame your shot nicely (I hate it when the AF point is JUST off, and it focuses on the background instead of the subjects in the foreground). I realize it&#039;s not quite as fast/good as the 50D&#039;s AF points, but if you&#039;re mainly shooting portraits/landscapes, speed is not a necessity. 

Either way, canon needs to get their s**t together because they got their clock cleaned by Nikon w/ the d300. It&#039;s by far the best prosumer dslr. Sure the D300 is more than the 50D, but you get SO much more camera for a couple hundred bucks more. In a couple years (when I&#039;ll be itching to upgrade my dslr), hopefully there&#039;ll be a much better alternative to upgrade to, or I just may be switching to Nikon.. Here&#039;s hoping they get it right. Oh ya, like others said, we have enough MP&#039;s these days. They ought to focus on actual image quality vs. cramming more pixels on a sensor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I look forward to an actual upgrade to the 40D. Like others have said, the 50D just plain sucks (I was expecting something better than the 40D). I&#8217;m a canon owner myself, and was considering making the jump to a 50D (I&#8217;ve owned an XSi now for a little while, and feel I&#8217;ve &#8220;grown&#8221; out of it), but the 50D is honestly just not worth it. I&#8217;d be better off with a 40D. I&#8217;ve played with a friend&#8217;s 40D quite a bit, but don&#8217;t feel it&#8217;s necessarily worth the upgrade for me. anyway..</p>
<p>A friend has a d300, and I must say, it wipes the floor with the 40D/50D. It ALMOST made me want to sell all my lenses and switch to Nikon. What do I love about it? 2 main things.. PQ is outstanding (hands down beats the 50D), and the autofocus system is awesome for a casual photographer. You aren&#8217;t stuck with a small diamond (like on canons), and can frame your shot nicely (I hate it when the AF point is JUST off, and it focuses on the background instead of the subjects in the foreground). I realize it&#8217;s not quite as fast/good as the 50D&#8217;s AF points, but if you&#8217;re mainly shooting portraits/landscapes, speed is not a necessity. </p>
<p>Either way, canon needs to get their s**t together because they got their clock cleaned by Nikon w/ the d300. It&#8217;s by far the best prosumer dslr. Sure the D300 is more than the 50D, but you get SO much more camera for a couple hundred bucks more. In a couple years (when I&#8217;ll be itching to upgrade my dslr), hopefully there&#8217;ll be a much better alternative to upgrade to, or I just may be switching to Nikon.. Here&#8217;s hoping they get it right. Oh ya, like others said, we have enough MP&#8217;s these days. They ought to focus on actual image quality vs. cramming more pixels on a sensor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Swan</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-60d7d-aps-h-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-14043</link>
		<dc:creator>John Swan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2173#comment-14043</guid>
		<description>We all want to hear more news on the much anticipated 60D. My understanding that it is going to wipe the floor with the D300. Expect formal announcement week beginning 24th Aug-09, with perhaps some leaks coming before then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all want to hear more news on the much anticipated 60D. My understanding that it is going to wipe the floor with the D300. Expect formal announcement week beginning 24th Aug-09, with perhaps some leaks coming before then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocky</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-60d7d-aps-h-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-14027</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2173#comment-14027</guid>
		<description>http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/article_pages/guest/physical_limits.html

The above web site is a good article to read about limitation of pixel size. foe me 15 mp on a APS_C sensor is not a good thing to do. Have you ever wondering why most of the lens test result showing the lens performance start to deteriate after f 5.6 with a APS-C sensor ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/article_pages/guest/physical_limits.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/article_pages/guest/physical_limits.html</a></p>
<p>The above web site is a good article to read about limitation of pixel size. foe me 15 mp on a APS_C sensor is not a good thing to do. Have you ever wondering why most of the lens test result showing the lens performance start to deteriate after f 5.6 with a APS-C sensor ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-60d7d-aps-h-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-14003</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2173#comment-14003</guid>
		<description>The focal length is the same no matter the crop idiot. It&#039;s FOV that changes. Your post is a bit extreme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The focal length is the same no matter the crop idiot. It&#8217;s FOV that changes. Your post is a bit extreme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocky</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-60d7d-aps-h-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-13986</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2173#comment-13986</guid>
		<description>Sensor technology has come a long way since the 20D, 10 mp days. In order to catch up with the technology, Canon cannot just put the old 10 mp sensor in any new camera. For me a new 12 mp or even 10 mp in the APS-H size sensor with all the new technology ,i.e. smaller space between pixel and no gap between the lens for each pixel plus lower intrinsic noise etc. will be the answer. Then, put ALL the features from 50D into it. This will make a killer camera. I am sure that most photographer will prefer it rather than the 15 mp sensor 50D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sensor technology has come a long way since the 20D, 10 mp days. In order to catch up with the technology, Canon cannot just put the old 10 mp sensor in any new camera. For me a new 12 mp or even 10 mp in the APS-H size sensor with all the new technology ,i.e. smaller space between pixel and no gap between the lens for each pixel plus lower intrinsic noise etc. will be the answer. Then, put ALL the features from 50D into it. This will make a killer camera. I am sure that most photographer will prefer it rather than the 15 mp sensor 50D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-60d7d-aps-h-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-13984</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2173#comment-13984</guid>
		<description>while I agree with the basics of your argument involving pixel density and its inverse relation with photo-site size, I would like to point out if you expect to see these advantages it will have to be on a recently designed chip to reach full potential.  that means R&amp;D, more so the development, but none-the-less, its not exactly practical to design a sensor for such a small number of cameras.

personally I would prefer they just stop at 15MP, having fulfilled most every consumer need and from there work on improving sensor properties including noise, dynamic range, and color fidelity</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>while I agree with the basics of your argument involving pixel density and its inverse relation with photo-site size, I would like to point out if you expect to see these advantages it will have to be on a recently designed chip to reach full potential.  that means R&amp;D, more so the development, but none-the-less, its not exactly practical to design a sensor for such a small number of cameras.</p>
<p>personally I would prefer they just stop at 15MP, having fulfilled most every consumer need and from there work on improving sensor properties including noise, dynamic range, and color fidelity</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-60d7d-aps-h-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-13979</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2173#comment-13979</guid>
		<description>Bring back 10 MP!!!!!! Have your regular 60d with however many gazillion MP, but run a limited edition 60d 10MP . Is that too much to ask ?!?! Basically everything else the same , just make a &quot;few&quot; 10MP sensors , and &quot;stick them in there&quot;. Surely if Nikon was able to do it , and even with much cheaper camera  (D40 and D40x), Canon is a bigger company , so that should be even less of a problem for them!
As a side benefit, they will find out if people care more about image quality , or gazzilion MP (yeah , i want both , but the cake hasn&#039;t arrived yet so i can eat it too :) .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bring back 10 MP!!!!!! Have your regular 60d with however many gazillion MP, but run a limited edition 60d 10MP . Is that too much to ask ?!?! Basically everything else the same , just make a &#8220;few&#8221; 10MP sensors , and &#8220;stick them in there&#8221;. Surely if Nikon was able to do it , and even with much cheaper camera  (D40 and D40x), Canon is a bigger company , so that should be even less of a problem for them!<br />
As a side benefit, they will find out if people care more about image quality , or gazzilion MP (yeah , i want both , but the cake hasn&#8217;t arrived yet so i can eat it too :) .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Any suggestions on a digital camera with a high zoom lens? &#124; Canon Powershot G9 Digital Camera</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-60d7d-aps-h-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-13771</link>
		<dc:creator>Any suggestions on a digital camera with a high zoom lens? &#124; Canon Powershot G9 Digital Camera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2173#comment-13771</guid>
		<description>[...] Canon Rumors Ã‚Â» Blog Archive Ã‚Â» Canon EOS 60D/7D Ã¢â‚¬â€œ APS-H? [CR1] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canon Rumors Ã‚Â» Blog Archive Ã‚Â» Canon EOS 60D/7D Ã¢â‚¬â€œ APS-H? [CR1] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What digital camera would be best for me and my price range this Christmas?</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/canon-eos-60d7d-aps-h-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-13582</link>
		<dc:creator>What digital camera would be best for me and my price range this Christmas?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 01:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2173#comment-13582</guid>
		<description>[...] Canon Rumors Ã‚Â» Blog Archive Ã‚Â» Canon EOS 60&amp;#68/7&amp;#68 Ã¢â‚¬â€œ A&amp;#80S-H? [CR1] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canon Rumors Ã‚Â» Blog Archive Ã‚Â» Canon EOS 60&amp;#68/7&amp;#68 Ã¢â‚¬â€œ A&amp;#80S-H? [CR1] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/49 queries in 0.021 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 538/539 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 19:47:54 -->
