<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EF 35 f/1.4L Discontinued?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/ef-35-f1-4l-discontinued/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/ef-35-f1-4l-discontinued/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can i use a 18-55 lens for portrait photography? what are the negative effects? &#124; Photography Lenses</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/ef-35-f1-4l-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-15274</link>
		<dc:creator>Can i use a 18-55 lens for portrait photography? what are the negative effects? &#124; Photography Lenses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 19:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2227#comment-15274</guid>
		<description>[...] Canon Rumors Ã‚Â» Blog Archive Ã‚Â» EF 35 f/1.4L Discontinued? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canon Rumors Ã‚Â» Blog Archive Ã‚Â» EF 35 f/1.4L Discontinued? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mile</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/ef-35-f1-4l-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-14649</link>
		<dc:creator>Mile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 08:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2227#comment-14649</guid>
		<description>FYI it said discontinued on amazon at least as far back as April 2008, that&#039;s when I was looking to buy one. At that time their website said the 24L was discontinued too, but that was months before it actually got discontinued. I finally purchased the 35L in August 08, and since it had a current date code, I figured it was just amazon.com&#039;s error. I wouldn&#039;t base my beliefs off of what amazon says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI it said discontinued on amazon at least as far back as April 2008, that&#8217;s when I was looking to buy one. At that time their website said the 24L was discontinued too, but that was months before it actually got discontinued. I finally purchased the 35L in August 08, and since it had a current date code, I figured it was just amazon.com&#8217;s error. I wouldn&#8217;t base my beliefs off of what amazon says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/ef-35-f1-4l-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-14059</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2227#comment-14059</guid>
		<description>and the price &quot;lowered&quot;....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and the price &#8220;lowered&#8221;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/ef-35-f1-4l-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-14042</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2227#comment-14042</guid>
		<description>The 50 &amp; 85 1.2&#039;s are huge, but then so is the 24-70 2.8, I&#039;m sure it would be similar in size to the existing 1.2&#039;s, and priced in line with them as well. Like having 4 TS-E lenses, a full line up of 1.2 L&#039;s could help keep Canon&#039;s lens line on top of the rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 50 &amp; 85 1.2&#8242;s are huge, but then so is the 24-70 2.8, I&#8217;m sure it would be similar in size to the existing 1.2&#8242;s, and priced in line with them as well. Like having 4 TS-E lenses, a full line up of 1.2 L&#8217;s could help keep Canon&#8217;s lens line on top of the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mirko</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/ef-35-f1-4l-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-14041</link>
		<dc:creator>mirko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2227#comment-14041</guid>
		<description>allright, still so many people start talking about as if it was a rumor.

i really doubt this F1.2 will become true, the lens would be huge and very very expensive!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>allright, still so many people start talking about as if it was a rumor.</p>
<p>i really doubt this F1.2 will become true, the lens would be huge and very very expensive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/ef-35-f1-4l-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-14040</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2227#comment-14040</guid>
		<description>I brought it up. But I didn&#039;t say it was a rumor. I just said I hoped it would be 1.2 so we&#039;d have a 1.2 in 35, 50 and 85.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I brought it up. But I didn&#8217;t say it was a rumor. I just said I hoped it would be 1.2 so we&#8217;d have a 1.2 in 35, 50 and 85.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mirko</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/ef-35-f1-4l-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-14036</link>
		<dc:creator>mirko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2227#comment-14036</guid>
		<description>if it would be indeed F1.2 (who gave birth to that rumor anyway) the price would be unreasonable high, lets say 2000$

35mm 1.4 II would be perfectly fine with today high iso performance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if it would be indeed F1.2 (who gave birth to that rumor anyway) the price would be unreasonable high, lets say 2000$</p>
<p>35mm 1.4 II would be perfectly fine with today high iso performance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/ef-35-f1-4l-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-14028</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 03:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2227#comment-14028</guid>
		<description>Yep, my local store has lots of backorders from Canon too, including the 5D2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, my local store has lots of backorders from Canon too, including the 5D2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redkamel</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/ef-35-f1-4l-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-14026</link>
		<dc:creator>redkamel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2227#comment-14026</guid>
		<description>perfect, since I JUST bought a 35L...(rolls eyes). I could see updates on the way.

But also in terms of all the &quot;out of stocks&quot; I talked to my local Adorama and they said Canon scaled back production of all their lenses because of the economy. Shipments for them have been unpredictable; they order 5DIIs, lenses etc...and they get partial fills or late shipments. Take it for whats its worth..anyone else heard similiar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perfect, since I JUST bought a 35L&#8230;(rolls eyes). I could see updates on the way.</p>
<p>But also in terms of all the &#8220;out of stocks&#8221; I talked to my local Adorama and they said Canon scaled back production of all their lenses because of the economy. Shipments for them have been unpredictable; they order 5DIIs, lenses etc&#8230;and they get partial fills or late shipments. Take it for whats its worth..anyone else heard similiar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gusto</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/ef-35-f1-4l-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-14024</link>
		<dc:creator>Gusto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2227#comment-14024</guid>
		<description>Then it&#039;ll suffer focus shift due to extreme large aperture. And people will start b***hing again. No, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then it&#8217;ll suffer focus shift due to extreme large aperture. And people will start b***hing again. No, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/ef-35-f1-4l-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-14021</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2227#comment-14021</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been very quiet here since the last 2000D rumor...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been very quiet here since the last 2000D rumor&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DNHJR</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/ef-35-f1-4l-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-14019</link>
		<dc:creator>DNHJR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2227#comment-14019</guid>
		<description>I would wait for word from Canon. What does amazon know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would wait for word from Canon. What does amazon know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/ef-35-f1-4l-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-14018</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2227#comment-14018</guid>
		<description>My guess is just out-of-stock month. Canon&#039;s announcement of the new hybrid IS coming to a lens soon hints strongly at a new macro, but most likely it&#039;ll be an L which wouldn&#039;t be a replacement for the 100 2.8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is just out-of-stock month. Canon&#8217;s announcement of the new hybrid IS coming to a lens soon hints strongly at a new macro, but most likely it&#8217;ll be an L which wouldn&#8217;t be a replacement for the 100 2.8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/ef-35-f1-4l-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-14017</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2227#comment-14017</guid>
		<description>Discontinued doesn&#039;t mean that the distribution pipeline&#039;s cleared; retailers may be able to get more for some time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Discontinued doesn&#8217;t mean that the distribution pipeline&#8217;s cleared; retailers may be able to get more for some time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/49 queries in 0.013 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 538/539 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 18:14:16 -->
