Comments on: It’s Nikon Night! http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/its-nikon-night/ You gotta know Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:12:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Snicker http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/its-nikon-night/comment-page-1/#comment-14860 Snicker Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:58:36 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2236#comment-14860 The lady with the lamp picture is extremely underexposed. Any camera would give noise (even 5D mkII ;)). The lady with the lamp picture is extremely underexposed. Any camera would give noise (even 5D mkII ;)).

]]> By: Gal http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/its-nikon-night/comment-page-1/#comment-14628 Gal Sat, 01 Aug 2009 01:14:37 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2236#comment-14628 I find the Nikon layout of buttons and interface a lot more efficient than Canon's. I think the ergonomics of the Nikon bodies lend themselves better to quick adjustments actually, and things just make more sense. I find the Nikon layout of buttons and interface a lot more efficient than Canon’s. I think the ergonomics of the Nikon bodies lend themselves better to quick adjustments actually, and things just make more sense.

]]> By: Akram http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/its-nikon-night/comment-page-1/#comment-14515 Akram Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:50:26 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2236#comment-14515 That is SOOO stupid! How come u will compare 120% crop to 100%... Are you seriously a photographer? That is SOOO stupid! How come u will compare 120% crop to 100%… Are you seriously a photographer?

]]> By: David http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/its-nikon-night/comment-page-1/#comment-14484 David Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:20:50 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2236#comment-14484 Quote "Canon need only improve on the optical quality of their 18-200 and 17-85. ;)" Hopefully they will do just that. Quote “Canon need only improve on the optical quality of their 18-200 and 17-85. ;)”

Hopefully they will do just that.

]]> By: David http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/its-nikon-night/comment-page-1/#comment-14457 David Fri, 31 Jul 2009 05:29:25 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2236#comment-14457 multiple focus points is for woosies - real men use more direct print buttons! multiple focus points is for woosies – real men use more direct print buttons!

]]> By: David http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/its-nikon-night/comment-page-1/#comment-14454 David Fri, 31 Jul 2009 05:26:03 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2236#comment-14454 yep, it's an interesting strategy. The biggest battle is for new DSLR owners, Rebel/500D/D5000 territory - once they get them then it's what to upgrade to, and Canon plays smart going for the $1200 price point, and giving a fair amount of bang for the buck on the 50D. Where Canon drops the ball though is the leap from $1200 to $2700, a niche for a would-be 7D. yep, it’s an interesting strategy. The biggest battle is for new DSLR owners, Rebel/500D/D5000 territory – once they get them then it’s what to upgrade to, and Canon plays smart going for the $1200 price point, and giving a fair amount of bang for the buck on the 50D. Where Canon drops the ball though is the leap from $1200 to $2700, a niche for a would-be 7D.

]]> By: David http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/its-nikon-night/comment-page-1/#comment-14453 David Fri, 31 Jul 2009 05:13:51 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2236#comment-14453 I agree the D300 is a great camera, and if all there was to choose from was the D300 and 50D I'd probably go with the Nikon. I have a 50D because I like a crop body in addition to FF ones. Whether I upgrade it to a 60D I'll have to see what Canon does. I don't think it'll go head to head with the D300 though but we'll see. It's priced for upgrade from the Rebel line and 2K would be too much a jump from $900. I agree the D300 is a great camera, and if all there was to choose from was the D300 and 50D I’d probably go with the Nikon. I have a 50D because I like a crop body in addition to FF ones. Whether I upgrade it to a 60D I’ll have to see what Canon does. I don’t think it’ll go head to head with the D300 though but we’ll see. It’s priced for upgrade from the Rebel line and 2K would be too much a jump from $900.

]]> By: denz http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/its-nikon-night/comment-page-1/#comment-14399 denz Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:58:39 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2236#comment-14399 maybe they got a better sensor but in wrong implementation. don't compare the specs, compare the real world output. maybe they got a better sensor but in wrong implementation. don’t compare the specs, compare the real world output.

]]> By: denz http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/its-nikon-night/comment-page-1/#comment-14398 denz Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:51:23 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2236#comment-14398 dxomark? it's so easy to tell that this camera is 2 stops better than that one. look at the sample images here and tell me now if how much better the D300s against Canon G10 (only a P&S). http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/digitalcamera/slr/d300s/sample.htm too much grain.... dxomark? it’s so easy to tell that this camera is 2 stops better than that one. look at the sample images here and tell me now if how much better the D300s against Canon G10 (only a P&S). http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/digitalcamera/slr/d300s/sample.htm
too much grain….

]]> By: denz http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/its-nikon-night/comment-page-1/#comment-14397 denz Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:45:11 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2236#comment-14397 features are only important to hobbyist, image quality is for Pro. here's the link: http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/digitalcamera/slr/d300s/sample.htm Go Fitch features are only important to hobbyist, image quality is for Pro. here’s the link:
http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/digitalcamera/slr/d300s/sample.htm
Go Fitch

]]>