Comments on: T1/2000D Announcement…. Again [CR1] http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/t12000d-announcement-again-cr1/ You gotta know Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:57:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: David http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/t12000d-announcement-again-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12914 David Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:22:46 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2163#comment-12914 The T1i/500D was announced 14 months after the XSi/450D. I would imagine that the T1/2000D will be the same which would be August The T1i/500D was announced 14 months after the XSi/450D. I would imagine that the T1/2000D will be the same which would be August

]]> By: David http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/t12000d-announcement-again-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12913 David Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:22:25 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2163#comment-12913 The T1i/500D was announced 14 months after the XSi/500D. I would imagine that the T1/2000D will be the same which would be August The T1i/500D was announced 14 months after the XSi/500D. I would imagine that the T1/2000D will be the same which would be August

]]> By: Zac http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/t12000d-announcement-again-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12687 Zac Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:55:27 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2163#comment-12687 having owned with a rebel XT and currently owning a 1D mkIII I agree that the glass makes all the difference, but you need to realize that a lot of people buy entry level DLSR cameras as uber P&S cameras, not because they intend to be photographers, be that artistic professional or whatever else. A lot of people are better off with these cameras than with the alternative, and its simply not worth it to them to pay for a better camera. Obviously people who hawk all day on gear forums, like you and I, do care enough to pay the difference, and have entirely different expectations of performance. remember that camera companies make just as much, if not more, from the entry level sales as they do pro body sales, and that all feeds off the same technology base as all the other DSLR bodies, just at a reduced quality and cost. So the money Canon makes from these cameras goes into paying their workers to make all the cameras, the lenses, the flashes, etc... that we do want, and some of it goes to pay for development of better technology, like sensors, and AF that everyone benefits from. Its obvious that you don't want a 2000D, probably only about 5% of the people who read this blog do, but that's no reason to attack it by calling it 'not a real camera' lots of people have gotten good results from POSH cameras, some with luck and some with skill, just because you personally find it intolerable to use (as do I) does not call for this epic ballad of hate on the least expensive camera in Canon's line-up. having owned with a rebel XT and currently owning a 1D mkIII I agree that the glass makes all the difference, but you need to realize that a lot of people buy entry level DLSR cameras as uber P&S cameras, not because they intend to be photographers, be that artistic professional or whatever else. A lot of people are better off with these cameras than with the alternative, and its simply not worth it to them to pay for a better camera. Obviously people who hawk all day on gear forums, like you and I, do care enough to pay the difference, and have entirely different expectations of performance. remember that camera companies make just as much, if not more, from the entry level sales as they do pro body sales, and that all feeds off the same technology base as all the other DSLR bodies, just at a reduced quality and cost. So the money Canon makes from these cameras goes into paying their workers to make all the cameras, the lenses, the flashes, etc… that we do want, and some of it goes to pay for development of better technology, like sensors, and AF that everyone benefits from. Its obvious that you don’t want a 2000D, probably only about 5% of the people who read this blog do, but that’s no reason to attack it by calling it ‘not a real camera’ lots of people have gotten good results from POSH cameras, some with luck and some with skill, just because you personally find it intolerable to use (as do I) does not call for this epic ballad of hate on the least expensive camera in Canon’s line-up.

]]> By: Canondale http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/t12000d-announcement-again-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12660 Canondale Mon, 06 Jul 2009 08:26:57 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2163#comment-12660 If I buy a DSLR, it has nothing to do with a P&S. I want good quality images, high dyn range, possibly low DOF. Also, I've tried the 18km to my work with my car, the train and the bicycle. The latter always wins at under 30 minutes, although my car has higher pixels, eh, PS. If I buy a DSLR, it has nothing to do with a P&S. I want good quality images, high dyn range, possibly low DOF.

Also, I’ve tried the 18km to my work with my car, the train and the bicycle. The latter always wins at under 30 minutes, although my car has higher pixels, eh, PS.

]]> By: zach http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/t12000d-announcement-again-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12640 zach Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:52:28 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2163#comment-12640 ok lets just hate me becuse i find missing features rediculus i got into photography shoting a rebel i now shoot a 40d and there is no comparison. even with a cheap dslr your going to get crap results without nice glass so regardless it is not a wallet friendly art form ok lets just hate me becuse i find missing features rediculus i got into photography shoting a rebel i now shoot a 40d and there is no comparison.

even with a cheap dslr your going to get crap results without nice glass so regardless it is not a wallet friendly art form

]]> By: ggweci http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/t12000d-announcement-again-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12624 ggweci Sun, 05 Jul 2009 20:30:50 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2163#comment-12624 +1 Either one I would be happy with, but the 16-120 would be sweet. We need some further confirmation on this please. Wonder what they would be price at? Nikon's 18-105 VR goes for about $350 US, so I'm assuming it would be a fair bit more than that due to the larger aperture? +1

Either one I would be happy with, but the 16-120 would be sweet. We need some further confirmation on this please.

Wonder what they would be price at? Nikon’s 18-105 VR goes for about $350 US, so I’m assuming it would be a fair bit more than that due to the larger aperture?

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/t12000d-announcement-again-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12621 Anonymous Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:14:17 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2163#comment-12621 I guess you hate them because they made the world of photography cheap as every one can join thanks to those cheap dslrs I guess you hate them because they made the world of photography cheap as every one can join thanks to those cheap dslrs

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/t12000d-announcement-again-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12620 Anonymous Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:11:49 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2163#comment-12620 I don't think that nikon will stay 12mp for long. I don’t think that nikon will stay 12mp for long.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/t12000d-announcement-again-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12619 Anonymous Sun, 05 Jul 2009 14:12:46 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2163#comment-12619 Dude, what about the EF-S 18-200mm IS? Dude, what about the EF-S 18-200mm IS?

]]> By: Zac http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/t12000d-announcement-again-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12615 Zac Sun, 05 Jul 2009 05:07:56 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2163#comment-12615 wow lets just hate on entry cameras. yeah they're not up to pro standards. duh, but it helps a lot of people make better images for their home life, and canon a lot of $$$ to put into R&D with stuff we do care about. so chill, no one is going to make you buy one, much less shoot an ad campaign with one. wow lets just hate on entry cameras. yeah they’re not up to pro standards. duh, but it helps a lot of people make better images for their home life, and canon a lot of $$$ to put into R&D with stuff we do care about. so chill, no one is going to make you buy one, much less shoot an ad campaign with one.

]]> By: Canon Rumors » Blog Archive » T1/2000D Announcement…. Again [CR1] | 7D http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/t12000d-announcement-again-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12613 Canon Rumors » Blog Archive » T1/2000D Announcement…. Again [CR1] | 7D Sun, 05 Jul 2009 02:23:36 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2163#comment-12613 [...] original here: Canon Rumors » Blog Archive » T1/2000D Announcement…. Again [CR1] Post a [...] [...] original here: Canon Rumors » Blog Archive » T1/2000D Announcement…. Again [CR1] Post a [...]

]]> By: zach http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/t12000d-announcement-again-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12610 zach Sat, 04 Jul 2009 20:58:03 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2163#comment-12610 no i just just dont like toy cameras that dont have pc ports and require toy to look at big ass lcd to check the setting that arnt in the viewfinder stuff like no i just just dont like toy cameras that dont have pc ports and require toy to look at big ass lcd to check the setting that arnt in the viewfinder stuff like

]]> By: dfo http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/t12000d-announcement-again-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12609 dfo Sat, 04 Jul 2009 19:18:53 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2163#comment-12609 + 1 for that! + 1 for that!

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/t12000d-announcement-again-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-12604 Anonymous Sat, 04 Jul 2009 14:54:22 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2163#comment-12604 Such a POSH comment ! Cause of course you guies are professional photographers ... Such a POSH comment !

Cause of course you guies are professional photographers …

]]>